Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Re: Digest for politicalforum@googlegroups.com - 25 Messages in 19 Topics

Modern Dimensions Of Islam

 "It is good thing to have two ways of looking at the subject and to admit that there are two ways of looking at it "James C. Maxwell

Protect women , children , elders , worship places , faiths of all even during the war" Al Quran

No comments on faiths/religions of others " Prophet Muhammad PBUH

"State must have a religion but controlled by the state " Napoleon

Get the facts first then twist them as you like. – Napoleon

History is fable agreed by historian. – Napoleon 

"Consider what is said don't bother who said it" Hazrat Ali PBUH

Islam is protection of human rights of huminity without consider , faith , color , race and area . UNO Charte accepted by 149 nations is last address by prophet PBUH. Quran has addressed all creatures and it is a book including all Divine books based religions doctrine. Non of 66 so called Islamic countries have tried to explain Law of Sharia in practical sense of modern environments thus generation huge mis-conceptions. Let us take judicial notice on Sharia clearing mis conceptions . Discussion with Victor , Do we have Islam any where ? and many other comments are on the record.

Aim of  my comment is based on humanity trying to reduce corruption by kiling and terrorism based on existing laws not mentioning any changes. Social Security in Islam is 2.5 % and Usher or Jizia is 10 %  but no or no usher is implemented. Most of countries have taxes 30 % but Paksistan is charging 60 % . Social security fraud only on Sunni Muslims they also submit certificates to avoid it and baitulmall collection reaching to deserving person is 2% if you are lucky to be part of some party. Being Chairman of  such Security system since a decade , I was paid $ 72 per year for stationary , visits to banks , District offices and even they audited it many times. Being miser of higest order on this money I spent $ 200 out of my pocket . My wife turned up and asked $ 400 for distribution among widows who were getting nothing so share equal one widow supposed to be paid to me was distributed among three , fuuny $ 6 being distributed. Flood victims , poors beggers got these $ 70. I had to keep this money after being audited ,spent on papers distributed $ 1300 out of $ 72. I had not received any money since last 5 years though $ 100 were kept in account to pay cost of cheque books etc out of spent money. Audit objection came you trasfer this all ammount to us. " You had eaten $ 4 billion share of poor , how the hell can you ask such a non sense . A secret charman was nominated to eat away all  the money of 3 years.

What is object on the Shariat Law having nothinng against anyone ? Does any law allowes , 1200 % corruption , eating 1300 out of Rs 100 , does any law allows pay increase of 2100 % for persons parliament , 100 to 700 % for killers , terorist and corrupt officla , 50 % for the nation any minus 30 % for pensiners. Does any law allows using money of civilian for 15 years retirng at age 60 before giving them half commuted pension , Using money of retired forces persons for 35 years calling it age 75 years. Does age has anything to do with use of communted money. Does any law allows drugmafia and landmafia to public for additional money. Income of  Pakistan is $ 8 billions reaching just $ 1 billion , we have outlaws killers 25 % share by Revenue department with corruption of $ 1.9 trillions , hired killer police , courts , lawyers Wapda , gas , Railway, PIA ,customs excise , FBR , banks looting away $ 7 Billions and givng 60 % to politicians , Public looting on Electric , gas , telephone , patrol and other is $ 45 billions coming $  13 billion , same rule giving 80 % commission to politicians . We get % 14 billions , Corruption House gets $ 7 biilion $ 14 billion is other corruption , they kick the ass of courts , they destroy laws , they kill public for additional corruption $ 3 billion. Huge army of ministers , advisors , others 9886 criminals drug mafia land mafia , outlaws , terrorists are given $ 3.5 billion , so called opposition though patner in corruption get $ 3.5 billions , there are others forces getting $ 2.5 billions , public kiler & death sellers Liars /devils and so called courts kicking and fucking anyone not terrorist dealing with useless side issues get $ 2.5 billion , press & media yellow part is vital to  digest corruption , they get $ 1.5 billions Our comment was to reduce terrorism for global peace. Please tell us what is bothering you. Why false statement ?        

Any questions ? Just raise the hand , Sony would pick up your question

 

Another Alexander The Great

"The only son to be born in 8 houses of 8th genration Governor Oadh Baat Khan later Habit Khan owner of 7th treasure has to be another Alexander" , Mid Wife Nadra w/o Ghulam Hassan could not understood message of King Zaman s/oGhulam Hassan when joke of King's highest class 5th was narrated to her.

Alexander born in 356 died in 323 , the teacher taught. " Died so many years before he was born" , Zaman muttered . Prince Aziz ( 6 Aziz with 6 fathers ) s/o King Zaman might answer which of his adopted dead as father has asked such a question : Zaman Lohar husband of Phlian ( Aziz 's mother is also Philan out of 6 adopted)  , Zaman s/o M Hassan adopted in 2006 ( Shah Wali s/o Shabaz) , Zaman Ali s/o M Ali grang father of Aziz , etc

Teacher had been teaching the same since a decade but no one ever dared to ask such a question. He had to reply if student was son of G Hassan.

" My lovable kids , crule kings died before their birth in ancient times" , Teacher satisfied Zaman

" But we have killed / disposed few in 1948 to return the good jesture of my 2 sons enrolled in Army even being ppotters not allowed unless attested by Numberdar. We had been serving the Queen ( Zebun, Mazur & Makhni 3 daughter of King). Nadra declared NA born on 13/4/1951 as a girl and vanished , other mid wife Lalan mother of Riaz later declared that boy was born. Lalian would be killed within a week if Thugs & killer read this blog.

Birth of Shapur King of Iran

G. Muhammad the only English expert was very famous leader of weaver leader is called Sirdar . Grand father of king was Sir Dar , father in law of king's sister Norian was Sir Fraz w/o M Hassan brother of Nur Hassan s/o Sir Fraz and 2rd sister  M Bi w/o Shah Sowar s/o Sir Andaz ,3rd sister Sahib Jee w/o G. Mummad ; all wives of men equal to age of their father had royal touch Shah ( King) Sirdar ( Tribal Chief) , oldmen were not trapped they gifted lands to their sons. Queen: 3Princes were launched were launched in same houses. Manzur Begum , neice Sirdar Begum & Fazlian were daughter in laws of Sahib Jee , MakhiBegm was launched to kick out Nurm Nabi d/o Nur Alam grand daughter of Sir Fraz 1st wife of Ghani s/o Shah Sowar and his son now Shapur . They had also royal name Afsar ( Oficers are called Sahib or Afsar). Afsar was killed in 1951 and his wife Arshadd/o Shah Sowar  and daughter Hamida were with M Bibi. with agricultural land and all income of over 20 year army service of Afsar, akbar also army husband of Fazlan had died in 1937. Any one with money dies like this everything cooming to Thug gang of king and Revenue , police and liars/devils called courts share the booty. Killing record of over 13 is actually 60. Third Princes was launched as daughter in law of Amir s/o M Ali  ( Amir is title for commander of troops) , Walyat ( great place for money foreign service ) husband of Zebun is master mind Thug and killer.

GM weavier had wife Sardar Begum so he must be accepted as Sardar ( chief of weaiver) . He had also got his enrolled in Army  so he accepted the demand of queen to make new kid as Shahpur. King of Iran was throwned 6 months earlier to his birth by putting the Crown on the belly of his mother. New kid N A ( not availble) born on 13/4/1951 was to be registered within 10 days so he was registered on 23/4/1951 to be born 6 month after 13/9/1951 as M N ( Murdered N). Kid was saved in 5 innovative killing method like frowed to death posing as jennies , throwing from heigh on stones. Bloodhound of Prince Aziz specially born after killing Aziz s/o Iman along with 4 in 1948 was prince. He is 5 year elder to neice Zubeda , equal in age of nephew Zar and few years elder to Arbi son of Zebun. 3 were rapping the girls as a teamwhen pregncy charges were paid by my father Sardar Ghani tribal leader and he was killed on 10/2/1987.          

Hunting & Politics:  Equal Supports

"It is good thing to have two ways of looking at the subject and to admit that there are two ways of looking at it "James C. Maxwell

"Peter take over controls , I would have a cup of coffi , bit of love to airhostess and then , I would sleep" Pilot's conversation of heard in the aeroplane ,the sound system was left on by mistake. The airhostess ran from back of the plane to switch of the system and struck against an senior citizen. " Ms , no hurry , he would 1st take a cup of coffee" , Citizen said " Compliments to humourous writer Colonel M. Khan

" Mr. P listen to me" , Nic my friend was calling some one . I kept on walking because I had never been Mr. P

I had been , Dr., Sufi, Nazeer, Professor, Chaudhry, Tony Director my own CIA, General Macarthur Commanding NATO Forces , Mac President TPI Inc. with 8 caps on my head . I might had been Prince as decendent of ex Governor Oadh Malik Bat Khan later Habit Khan 9 generation earlier but no one knew about 7th treasure till that time when my friend was calling some one. " He is calling you" , Sony came to stop me. We had taken oneweek leave to enjoy free flying on helicopter scanning all most all area of Indus Civilization.

"Are you not Mr. P , simple person,  why you were not listening to me." , Nic  said

Sonia VP Crook Dog Crakers Inc voluntered to explain. Excellencies flying in helicopters : VVIP are like hunting dogs and both get a straight bullet in their heads the moment they bark. VIPs Minsters and advisors are just like Bullterors ; the fighting dogs very costly in feed though the run away when left for fighting , the useless lot. Ips are very cunning shroude and clever bureaucrates , officials like German Sheferds trained on specific hunts. Lower staff has multiple usage OSD s like street dogs just Ms/Mr P ."

" I hope being operational engineer for two provinces and getting a chance of areial huntting you had to be told simple and clear that you remain as Mr. P" , Julia thanked Nic on my behalf.

Before going for hunting we have a political support in new fashion for new comers

Updated Solution of All Problems-1

It is criminal to steal a purse, daring to steal a fortune, a mark of greatness to steal a crown. The blame diminishes as the guilt increases.  Friedrich Schiller

The first major problem set serial 1 to 15 is corruption, corruption and corruption. The moderation may be used on criticism but we must start an accountibility at all level and we must try to reduce our non development expences.

Eva : Black and Yellow , stop embracing , shake hands and box

Jena VP M Ali Free Boxing Punches Inc. is join us from Venzevela sponsoring Nura Boxing in South Asia

Black Corner :Killer of BB : $ 25m , Rs 7 T each , Crown stelers ; DBA Double Bad All , DRM Double Ruing All , RPA Regional Priates Associates, 128 mosad & FBI under chief Amy VP A B Ch. Inc ( Ali Baba Chales Chor) Polluted Pirates Pehinda Puhlewan 10 agents total $ 1.63 t & Rs 260 T purchased country at $ 25 m & 7% votes purchased at Rs 5 b out of $ 82 billions IPP corruption , ,

Yellow Corner : Fortune Stealers Paka Mukmuka Nura Lance Corruption over 473 is $ 9  

Well done Yellow , Black is the Winner 

Eva : Welcome Vena Malik invited as Chief guest to award Oscar to Double Bad All for destruction of judicial system. Consitution deestroyers have already been awarded to killers

Zona : Ema VP Hitlers Back Bullets Inc is joing us from Franfurt to sponsor Nura Khusti in South Asia . Killer of 30000 the outlaws and public killers Board of Revenue , NRB , Revenue , hired killer police 8883 NRO Terrorists  Rs 200 Trillion are sponsors

 

Red Corner : Purse stealers Mush & Pirates Money Landers Quails 25 criminal $0.7 trillion,

Gren Corner : Murders Quick Money under chief with 50,000 Raw agents , 15 terorist corruption $ 0.47 trillion , Board of Revenue , NRB , Revenue , hired killer police Corruption Rs 200 Trillion , Quails fortune seekers

Ema , Weldone red , the Green is Winner , Rema would be joining to give Oscar to greens 

 This criticism based on facts and research of 50 years is for protection of humen rights though taken as open war against corruption network giving back over 30 killing attacksthe .Criticism is the greatest tool to achieve many objectives though not liked by many. Avoid this tool for kids , they repeat what they observe. If you want to improve yourself , you must invite criticism from neutral unkhown persons such as persons spending sometime during traveling or other such activities. The criticism by friends might be their concrn for you as your wife might criticise just getting attention may not be meaning anything. Enemies use this affective tool to achieve certain negative objectives. Pakistan has great potential for investments in alternative energy and many other fields .We must join toghter to offer protection of investors interest and protection of global trading routes. Law & Consitution  have to be clealy defined .  Pakistani Working outside Pakistan have made greatest contributions . My highest compliments to them. Our embassies have played zero role as I observed as researcher and journalist.Supreme is one and only one authority law giver the creator and supreme are laws of Sharia , UN Charter same as last Khutba , universal Laws and natural laws having nothing to do with consitution. Country might have a parliament or congress or body to implement Laws and country might have a written consitution or like UK no written consituion. An accountibility of corruption network is vital for ending terrorism with a view to establish global peace.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/nazeerbhatti52/es  

http://www.naymz.com/nazeerchaudhry-6e1c6?networkMessage.uid=yvor

http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=6554105552397855225&postID=6705180416212793612

http://www.linkedin.com/in/nazeerbhatti52 

http://www.facebook.com/people/Nazeer-Chaudhry/100001466267372 http://nazeerchaudhry.blogspot.com/ http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Nazeer_Ahmad_Chaudhry http://twitter.com/nazeeraahmadch http://nazeerchaudhry.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?orderby=updated

Contribution : http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Special:Contributions&target=User:Nazeer%20Ahmad%20Chaudhry&offset=450

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/User:Nazeer_Ahmad_Chaudhry

Ending Terrorism: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/ending-terrorism/

Human Rights: http://soleilmavis.ning.com/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kMD9ONVk38

http://peacepink.ning.com/profile/NazeerAhmadChaudhry101

Manager Asia : WGJG http://www.globalunityharmony.com/apps/auth/login?why=pw&next=apps%2Ffriends%2Findex 

http://www.xing.com/profile/Nazeer_Chaudhry

 

Global Solution of Problems : http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/global-solution-of-problems/

On 14 March 2012 02:09, <politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/topics

    Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> Mar 13 03:27PM -0500  

    **
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    *-------Original Message-------*****
     
    :, <Undisclosed-Recipient:,>****
     
    *Subject:* Fw: The Solar thing just got a little more
    interesting.......REALLY!****
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    ****
    ------------------------------
     
     
    Crony Socialism: Obama Gives $737 Million to Solar Firm Linked to the
    Pelosi C<http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/09/more-crony-socialism-obama-gives-737-million-to-pelosis-brother-in-laws-solar-firm/>
    ****
     
    ****
     
    ** **
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    *The Solar thing just got a little more interesting.......REALLY **!*****
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    . The Tonopah Solar company in Harry Reid's Nevada is getting a $737
    million loan from Obama's DOE .****
     
    . The project will produce a 110 megawatt power system and employ 45
    permanent workers .****
     
    . That's costing us just $16 million per job .****
     
    ****
     
    . One of the investment partners in this endeavor is Pacific Corporate
    Group (PCG).****
     
    . The PCG executive director is Ron Pelosi who is the brother to Nancy 's
    husband .****
     
    ****
     
    *Just move along folks.....nuthin goin on here **.*****
     
    ****
     
    *EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD KNOW HOW THEIR MONEY IS BEING STOLEN SO FORWARD THIS
    TO EVERYBODY*****
     
    ****
     
    *Google **Tonopah Solar company*****
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    ****
     
    ** **
     
    ** **
     
    ****
     
    ** **
     
    ** **

     

    Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> Mar 13 03:26PM -0500  

    ** **
     
    ** **
     
    There are actually two messages here. The
    first is very
    interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.
     
    A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very
    interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International
    Health Organization.
     
    Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years
    after diagnosis:
     
    U.S. 65%
     
    England 46%
     
    Canada 42%
     
     
    Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received
    treatment within six months:
     
    U.S. 93%
     
    England 15%
     
    Canada 43%
     
     
    Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it
    within six months:
     
    U.S. 90%
     
    England 15%
    ;
    Canada 43%
     
     
    Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within
    one month:
     
    U.S. 77%
     
    England 40%
     
    Canada 43%
     
     
    Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million
    people:
     
    U.S. 71
     
    England 14
     
    Canada 18
     
     
    Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are
    in "excellent health":
     
    U.S. 12%
     
    England 2%
     
    Canada 6%
     
     
    And now for the last statistic:
     
     
    National Health Insurance?
     
    U.S . NO
     
    England YES
     
    Canada YES
     
    Check this last set of statistics!!
     
    The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked
    in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
    You know what the private business sector is a real-life business, not a
    government job. Here are the percentages.
     
     
    T. Roosevelt.................... 38%
     
    Taft.................................. 40%
     
    Wilson ........................... 52%
     
    Harding........................... 49%
     
    Coolidge......................... 48%
     
    Hoover............................ 42%
     
    F. Roosevelt................... 50%
     
    Truman........................... 50%
     
    Eisenhower................ .... 57%
     
    Kennedy......................... 30%
     
    Johnson.......................... 47%
     
    Nixon.............................. 53%
     
    Ford................................ 42%
     
    Carter............................. 32%
     
    Reagan........................... 56%
     
    GH Bush......................... 51%
     
    Clinton .......................... 39%
     
    GW Bush........................ 55%
     
    Obama........... .......... 8%
     
     
    This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
    only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
     
    That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the
    last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big
    corporations how to run their business?
     
    How can the president of a major nation and society, the one
    with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk
    about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has
    never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff
    and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia,
    government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers." They
    should have been in an employment line.
     
    Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main
    stream media.****
     
    ****
     
    ** **

     

    Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> Mar 13 03:25PM -0500  

    Because truth hurts?**** **** ** ** ** ** March 12, 2012**** Robert
    Spencer: Why Can't Non-Muslims Criticize Islam?****
     
    [image: Description: Description:
    JWHeaderAS3]<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c60bf53ef016302be9aaf970d-pi>
     
    I am happy to announce a new feature: Robert Spencer's popular column,
    called Jihad Watch like his weblog <http://www.jihadwatch.org/> (which is
    also essential daily reading), has run weekly for nearly ten years
    elsewhere and been widely acclaimed. Now it is exclusively here at Atlas.
    Here's the first, "Why Can't Non-Muslims Criticize Islam?":****
     
    The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has long been embarked upon
    an all-out campaign to compel America and Europe to criminalize criticism
    of Islam, under the guise of criminalizing "defamation of religions."
    Meanwhile, Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups in the United States work
    energetically to demonize and marginalize any and all who speak out
    effectively about the threat of jihad and Islamic supremacism. Given the
    restrictions in Islamic law on non-Muslims saying anything "impermissible"
    about Islam or Muhammad, these campaigns are no surprise; what is
    surprising, however, is the extent to which all too many anti-jihadists
    have capitulated to them and imbibed their premises.****
     
    Islamic groups have insisted since 9/11 that only a tiny minority of
    extremists who misunderstand the peaceful teachings of Islam are
    responsible for the jihad attacks that occur with numbing frequency around
    the world – as of this writing, there have been 18,560 such attacks since
    that terrible day. Yet despite its daily discomfirmations, the claim that
    Islam is a religion of peace and that only "Islamophobes" think otherwise
    has gained remarkable traction. Evidence that core texts and teachings of
    Islam support and justify violence against and the subjugation of
    unbelievers, as illuminating as this fact is of jihadists' motives and
    goals, has been brushed aside even at the highest levels of our government
    and law enforcement agencies. The ideas that Islam is peace and that the
    vast majority of Muslims oppose any violence committed in its name are
    essential requirements for admittance into the mainstream of public
    discourse.****
     
    Yet one inconvenient fact explodes this iron and unquestionable dogma: in
    all the years since 9/11, no Muslim group of any significant size or
    influence has arisen that opposes not just vaguely defined "terrorism," but
    the jihad undertaken by whatever means in order to advance the rule of
    Islamic law and the subjugation of unbelievers. The conspicuous absence of
    such a group has led both the government and the mainstream media to embark
    upon an avid and ongoing search for "moderate Muslims," which has led to
    numerous embarrassing moments (or moments that would have been embarrassing
    if the mainstream media were ever held to any kind of accountability): the *New
    York Times* fulsomely praised Anwar al-Awlaki as a moderate reformer, and
    Janet Napolitano appointed Mohamed Elibiary, a man who once spoke at a
    conference devoted to praise of the Ayatollah Khomeini, and who has now
    been accused of leaking classified documents to the media, to a Homeland
    Security Advisory Panel.****
     
    These are far from being isolated incidents. In fact, Islamic supremacist
    pseudo-moderates so frequently fool non-Muslim officials and reporters (who
    are, after all, desperate to believe their soothing falsehoods) that to
    catalogue all such incidents would produce a tome the size of the
    Encylopedia Britannica. But the ranks of the fooled and foolish don't just
    include dhimmi Leftists; many among the anti-jihad Right also demonstrate
    in numerous ways that they have unwittingly accepted some of the Islamic
    supremacists' core claims.****
     
    Islamic law forbids non-Muslims to criticize Islam, and Islamic
    supremacists routinely accuse Americans who dare to speak out against the
    jihad and Islamic supremacism of "racism." Anti-jihadists deny the label,
    and yet tacitly endorse it when they take pains to feature "anti-Islamist"
    Muslims and even non-Muslim Arabs at rallies and conferences, and to laud
    their work beyond all proportion to its effectiveness in actually bringing
    about change within the Muslim community.****
     
    And so several years ago, an organization called the Free Muslims Against
    Terrorism held a massively publicized rally against terrorism, and drew no
    more than two dozen Muslims. More recently, last week another massively
    publicized rally of Muslims in support of NYPD anti-terror measures drew
    36. The enthusiasm greeting both of these sparsely attended rallies was out
    of all proportion to their actual significance. The unspoken and unexamined
    assumption behind this eagerness to call attention to "moderate Muslims,"
    despite their obviously non-representative character in the Muslim
    community, shows how deeply the "racism" charge has penetrated the
    anti-jihadist mindset: even opponents of jihad and Islamic supremacism
    apparently believe that their efforts are not fully legitimate unless
    Muslims are joining in them.****
     
    But why can't non-Muslims criticize Islam on their own, without Muslims or
    Arabs to validate their efforts? The human rights violations embedded
    within Islamic law are obvious to any objective observer. Any individual
    who cares for human rights has the right and, indeed, the responsibility to
    speak out and oppose them. It is good that there are "anti-Islamist"
    Muslims, insofar as they are sincere, but anti-jihadists who exaggerate
    their importance, influence, and Islamic authenticity not only delude
    themselves and mislead others; they also show that they have unconsciously
    adopted the dhimmi status that Islamic supremacists so devoutly hope to
    impose on them – at least in regard to the legitimacy of their own critique
    of Islam and jihad.****
     
    Non-Muslims standing for human rights against Sharia do not need Muslims to
    stand with them to give their efforts legitimacy. Muslims should be invited
    to join, and exhorted to renounce sincerely the violence, hatred and
    supremacism embedded within Islamic texts and teachings. However, the
    refusal of most to do so should not become the occasion for self-delusion
    about the few who do, or willful blindness about the nature and magnitude
    of the jihad threat.****
     
    *Robert Spencer is the director of **Jihad Watch*<http://www.jihadwatch.org/>
    *, associate director of AFDI/SIOA, and author of the New York Times
    bestsellers **The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the
    Crusades)*<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895260131/ref=ase_robertspencer-20/103-1603172-8127010?v=glance&s=books>
    * **and **The Truth About
    Muhammad*<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1596985283/105-1749781-4552435?ie=UTF8&tag=robertspencer-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=1596985283>
    *.*****
     
    Posted by Pamela Geller <http://profile.typepad.com/atlasshrugs2000> on
    Monday, March 12, 2012 at 09:24 AM |
    Permalink<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/03/robert-spencer-why-cant-non-muslims-criticize-islam.html>
    ****
     
    Reblog (0)<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/03/robert-spencer-why-cant-non-muslims-criticize-islam.html>
    | | Digg This<http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fatlasshrugs2000.typepad.com%2Fatlas_shrugs%2F2012%2F03%2Frobert-spencer-why-cant-non-muslims-criticize-islam.html&phase=2>
    | Save to del.icio.us <http://del.icio.us/post> | | ****
     
    | ****
    TrackBack****
     
    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c60bf53ef016763b34721970b
    ****
     
    ** **

     

    Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> Mar 13 03:01PM -0500  

    Celebs, Members of Congress Sign Bully Petition
    By Jeremy Kinser
     
     
     
    Pop singer Demi Lovato, New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees, and
    20 members of Congress have joined Ellen DeGeneres in signing Katy
    Butler's petition to change the rating of the documentary Bully.
     
    Butler, a Michigan high school student who identifies as lesbian and
    who launched a Change.org petition to change the R rating of the
    antibullying documentary to a more accessible PG-13 rating, personally
    delivered 200,000 signatures to the Motion Picture Association of
    America on March 7.
     
    Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.) has issued a bipartisan letter to the MPAA,
    signed by 20 additional members of Congress, supporting Butler's
    petition.
     
    "We are writing to express our sincere disappointment in the MPAA's
    decision to issue an R rating for the soon-to-be-released documentary
    Bully," the letter reads. "This important project shows the real life
    anguish of many teenagers in this country who are tormented, harassed,
    and bullied by their peers. This truth should be shared with as wide
    an audience as is appropriate and possible. We believe an R-rating
    excludes the very audience for whom this film is desperately
    important."
     
    Last week DeGeneres encouraged viewers of her daytime talk show to
    sign the petition and introduced Butler from the studio audience.
    Singer-actress Lovato also urged her more than five million Twitter
    followers to sign Butler's petition. You can sign the petition here.
     
    Sign Here:
     
    http://www.change.org/petitions/mpaa-don-t-let-the-bullies-win-give-bully-a-pg-13-instead-of-an-r-rating
    --
    Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
    Have a great day,
    Tommy
     
     
     
    --
    Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
    Have a great day,
    Tommy

     

    MJ <michaelj@america.net> Mar 13 04:00PM -0400  

    The First Amendment Needs a Rape Kit
     
    by Wendy McElroy, March 13, 2012
     
    The newest attack of vague language is aimed at your 1st Amendment rights of Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly and Freedom to Petition. It is found in the pending legislation of HR 347.… As currently worded, it might as well have been called the "Federal We're Too Important To Be Annoyed By Your Protest Act of 2011." -- Gene Howington
     
    The Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011 ( PDF) may sound like a landscaping measure, but it is also being called the Trespass Bill, the Anti-Occupy Bill, and the First Amendment Rights Eradication Act. Under this bill, it is a felony to protest at or in the vicinity of a venue or event that is attended by anyone who has Secret Service protection. HR 347 passed the House on February 27th by a vote of 388–3. The Senate version (S. 1794) passed unanimously. With President Obama's signature, the Act became law on March 8.
     
    The bill has caused a furor among advocates of civil liberties. Justin Amash, one of the three "no" votes in the House, dubbed the bill the "First Amendment Rights Eradication Act." Calling it "this administration's latest assault on our civil liberties," he explains on his Facebook page that "criminalizing legitimate First Amendment activity -- even if that activity is annoying to those government officials -- violates our rights."
     
    The left-leaning Daily Kos states, "Protesting will be a felony -- where is the outrage?"
     
    Meanwhile, the bill is being ignored by the mainstream media as uncontroversial. Supporters of the act dismiss its critics as hysterical or ill-informed. Michael Mahassey, the communications director for Rep. Thomas J. Rooney, who sponsored HR 347, called the backlash, "a whole lot of kerfuffle over nothing. This doesn't affect anyone's right to protest anywhere at any time. Ever."
     
    Who is correct? And why is there such a deep schism on HR 347?
     
    A bill by any other name would smell …
     
    The American Civil Liberties Union warns against HR 347. Nevertheless, the ACLU observes, "It's important to note contrary to some reports that HR 347 doesn't create any new crimes, or directly apply to the Occupy protests. The bill slightly rewrites a short trespass law, originally passed in 1971."
     
    Section 1752 of title 18 in the United States Code is entitled "Restricted Building or Grounds." This 1971 bill was intended to prevent assassination, kidnapping, or other attempts to harm the political elite, especially the president. The section of title 18 that immediately precedes it, section 1751, is entitled "Presidential and Presidential Staff Assassination, Kidnapping, and Assault; Penalties." Thus, section 1752 restricts people from entering or blocking access to or from public areas that have been cordoned off by the Secret Service for the protection of a person (or for a "special event of national significance," which could range from the Olympics to a political convention). The penalty for violating section 1752 includes a possible one-year jail term; if a "dangerous weapon" is involved, then the jail term rises to a possible ten years.
     
    In recent years, the 1971 bill has been interpreted beyond its intent in order to crack down on peaceful protesters. Moreover, as the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has amply demonstrated, the definition of a "dangerous weapon" has been expanded at the discretion of law enforcement to include such items as nail clippers.
     
    Thus, the controversy over the current revision, HR 347, revolves around two issues. First, is HR 347 part of a trend toward vagueness in legislative wording, which can be later exploited and expanded by authorities in order to violate civil liberties? Second, how legally "slight" is the change of wording in this revision?
     
    Consider the first question. Gene Howington, a guest blogger at Jonathan Turley's legal-analysis site, writes,
     
    it seems to be a trend that vague or overly broad language could be fairly described as being purposefully adopted allowing "wiggle room" for Federal authorities to potentially abuse civil and human rights under the color of authority. This is a dangerous practice.
     
    Howington refers to a recent example of legislative vagueness the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which gives Obama the power to indefinitely detain citizens without trial if they are accused of terrorism. Some politicians, notably Senator Carl Levin, argued that the NDAA did not allow such arrests and, so, soothed his worried compatriots while dismissing the bill's critics. Nevertheless, even Obama acknowledged his new power after the bill passed, saying, "I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens."
     
    No wonder legal scholars now scrutinize with a skeptical eye every word that appears in potentially menacing legislation.
     
    As to the second question, to determine how "slight" the revisions of HR 347 truly are, it is necessary to review them. One change has or could have deep significance. The original text reads,
     
    (a) It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons
     
    (1) willfully and knowingly to enter or remain in any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting.
     
    ***
     
    Four additional paragraphs, (2) through (5), begin with the words "willfully" and "knowingly."
     
    The revised text of paragraph (a)(1) in HR 347 reads,
     
    (1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so.
     
    The four additional clauses in the original are compressed to three, each of which now begins with the word "knowingly" only.
     
    Why is deleting the word "willfully" so significant? Because it removes the need for a prosecutor to prove that a protester had the intent to violate the statute, for example, through blocking an egress. All that needs to be proven is that the protester knew he was accessing a restricted area. His intent may have been nothing more than to exercise freedom of speech; blocking the exit may have been inadvertent. But under HR 347, his mens rea -- that is, that aspect of his state of mind -- becomes legally insignificant.
     
    In Latin, "mens rea" means "guilty mind" or guilty intention. Within Western law, an act has traditionally required a guilty mind for that act to become criminal behavior. That is why defendants who are found to be mentally incompetent are not placed on trial; they are not deemed capable of mens rea. The Latin legal phrase, actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea "the act does not make a person guilty unless the mind is also guilty" is often invoked in such cases.
     
    Writing in the periodical In These Times, Daniel Hertz encapsulates the impact of removing "willfully" from the statute, "In other words, Congress removed a hurdle in enforcing the law without actually adding any new restrictions to the First Amendment."
     
    They simply changed the rules of enforcement to remove what is often the most difficult element of the crime to prove: namely, intent. Indeed, since both the original text and HR 347 allow the arrest of someone who is merely in "proximity" to a restricted area, proving intent could be close to impossible. How could you prove that person was walking near a politician's hotel with the intent of causing harm or blocking the egress?
     
    As Gene Howington observes, "in addition" to lowering the threshold for mens rea***, HR 347 defines
     
    the term "restricted buildings or grounds" to mean virtually any place in proximity to or place proper [where] a government function or an "event of national interest" is taking place. This would allow for the arrest of protesters just about anywhere. Outside political rallies, near the hotels of visiting foreign dignitaries, outside sporting or other public events like the Super Bowl … you get the idea.
     
    HR 347 may well make the arrest and conviction of peaceful protesters much easier.
     
    Conclusion
     
    It is criminally naive to believe that the police and courts will not eventually use the expanded latitude granted by HR 347. The Occupy movement frightened and angered the authorities it yanked control away from. For years, "free speech zones," in which protesters speak from behind barred walls, as though in cages, contained dissenters and kept them far from government officials. They were allowed to protest only where the elite and the mainstream media would not hear them.
     
    Occupy changed that. And the authorities have struggled to find ways to contain dissent ever since; they never want to lose control again. And, especially in this election season, politicians are eager to avoid a repeat of the public outrage that surrounded the 1968 Democratic convention, when police were filmed brutally beating peaceful demonstrators in the street.
     
    The elites are losing patience with civil rights. This January, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel pushed through two anti-protest ordinances that were widely termed "sit down and shut up" measures. The online periodical and voice of Occupy, the Dissenter, describes two of several repressive new requirements.
     
    Ahead of demonstrations, "organizers would be required to provide the City with a list of all signs, banners, sound equipment or 'attention-getting devices' that require more than one person to carry them," creating "a license for the city to 'ding' organizers with absurd fines."
     
    All downtown protest marches would be required to get $1 million insurance coverage to "indemnify the city against any additional or uncovered third party claims against the city arising out of or caused by the parade." They would have to "agree to reimburse the city for any damage to the public way or city property arising out of or caused by the parade." Clearly, Emanuel is determined that the upcoming NATO/G8 meetings in his city will go smoothly. Emanuel and his ilk would not hesitate to use the free hand provided by HR 347 to prosecute "offenders." And god help them if the protesters are found to be in possession of a pair of nail clippers, small scissors, or any other item that could be construed as a "dangerous weapon." The penalty could then rise to ten years imprisonment for young people still idealistic enough to believe they have free speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to petition officials with their grievances.
     
    http://www.fff.org/comment/com1203l.asp

     

    Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> Mar 13 02:39PM -0500  

    ------------------------------
     
     
     
    *Identity Theft**:** **
    Until I read this**, **I did not realize how serious identity theft wa**s **
    becoming**.*
     
    *Pass this on to your loved ones and friends**.*
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    [image: Description: unknown.jpg]
     
     
     
    [image: Description: unknown_1.jpg]
     
     
     
    [image: Description: unknown_2.jpg]
     
     
     
    [image: Description: unknown_3.jpg]
     
     
     
    [image: Description: unknown_4.jpg]
     
     
     
     
    [image: Description: unknown_5.jpg]
     
     
     
     
    [image: Description: unknown_6.jpg]
    *Blessed are the cracked**,
    **for they let in the light**.*
     
     
    ------------------------------

     

    plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> Mar 13 08:29AM -0700  

    We need to understand that our being in the middle of countries like
    Afghanistan is probably counterproductive.
    ---
    probably?
     
    it's insanity
     

     

    GregfromBoston <greg.vincent@yahoo.com> Mar 13 08:23AM -0700  

    NY Times poll pegs Obambi's approval rating at an all time low,
    41%

     

    plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> Mar 13 08:21AM -0700  

    Why Can't You Smoke Pot?
    ---
    possible answers:
    - because I get too high and paranoid
    - out of money
    - can't find any
    - I get drug tested
     
    best answer: anybody who wants to can regardless of outdated pot laws
     

     

    Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> Mar 13 08:47AM -0500  

    I plan on witing in Judge Andrew Napolitano to see if I can stir up some
    %$#@.
     

     

    Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> Mar 13 09:14AM -0500  

    I actually will vote for Newt. Did you know that Santorum plays Pocket
    Pool with 2 Bibles?
     

     

    Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> Mar 13 10:18AM -0400  

    I know Santorum is a little goofy, but as much crap as he gets from
    Moonbats and the mainstream media, I semi-support him.
     
     
     
     

     

    Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> Mar 13 09:33AM -0500  

    No matter who the GOP nominee is of the three, I will be carrying a barf
    bag to the polls in November just as I have for the past three presidential
    elections.
     

     

    GregfromBoston <greg.vincent@yahoo.com> Mar 13 06:57AM -0700  

    Clinton took us into the Balkans without congress OR the UN
    On Sunday, March 11, 2012 4:26:04 PM UTC-4, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
    > power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the
    > Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and
    > misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
     
     
    On Sunday, March 11, 2012 4:26:04 PM UTC-4, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
    > power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the
    > Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and
    > misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
     
     
    On Sunday, March 11, 2012 4:26:04 PM UTC-4, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:

     

    Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> Mar 13 10:01AM -0400  

    On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:57 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vincent@yahoo.com>wrote:
     
    Clinton took us into the Balkans without congress OR the UN
     
    ==========
     
    All in an attempt to distract media attention from cum stains on an
    intern's dress, and to justify Madge "I Just Found Out I'm A Jew"
    Albright's appointment......

     

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group politicalforum.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
at

No comments:

Post a Comment