>
On Feb 13, 11:26 pm, NoEinstein <
noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Love thy neighbor, or love thy criminals.
>
> Polls taken throughout Barack Obama's tenure as our elected dictator
> show that a consistent 40% to 45% think he is doing OK as… President.
> That contrasts with as few as 16% of Americans who approve of Obama's
> handling of the US economy. Why isn't there a parallel between those
> two polling questions? Can one's rating as President not take into
> account both overall performance and specific performance?
>
> In 2004 I had heard glowing reports of an attractive Black man from
> Chicago who, supposedly, was delivering rousing speeches. So, I made
> it a point to listen when Obama addressed the Democratic Convention
> that year. My reaction wasn't favorable. The words of the speech
> were OK, but Obama was stony-faced and emotionless. He talked in a
> modified monotone—dropping his voice at the end of sentences as though
> his energy had drained out. The most noticeable aspect of his
> bearing, as a speaker, was the regularity with which he turned his
> head from side to side while reading teleprompters. Though he was
> articulate sounding, Obama didn't seem to be enjoying the message he
> was delivering. Where there is real passion, usually there are
> changes in speaking tone, changes in body language, and apt
> gesturing. Obama showed none of those. Whoever that 'attractive
> Black man from Chicago' was, he was keeping the true identity of the
> speaker hidden from public view. That fact made me feel very uneasy,
> mostly, because other people, apparently, were only seeing the
> slender, suave and handsome man, and not seeing the likely psychosis
> lurking below that man's surface.
>
> Bill Kristol of the 'Weekly Standard', a supposed conservative
> magazine, is a regular 'guest contributor' on Fox News. On Chris
> Wallace's show, Sunday, Kristol was his usual smiley self while he
> defended not firing policemen and librarians as part of needed budget
> cuts. Though I've never read a page of that magazine, I could
> immediately tell that Kristol is a liberal. His cast-in-stone smile
> also shows him to be a phony of the worst kind. When I was a kid, my
> father, who was a professional portrait photographer, told me that men
> don't smile 'naturally', without being coaxed. I've observed that men
> who are not trustworthy will smile excessively to created the opposite
> illusion.
>
> Bill O'Reilly smiles and chuckles his way though most of his shows.
> After interviewing Obama the night of the Super Bowl, O'Reilly said
> that Obama—who was all toothy-smiles the entire interview—is a
> friendly and likable man (gag… gag…). O'Reilly is this liberal
> Harvard luck-out with a moron's IQ telling his like-minded viewers
> that THE most divisive and hurtful man to the country in US history
> is… likable. Regularly doing that on national TV, as O'Reilly does,
> is, I believe, aiding and abetting treason. For that reason, Bill
> O'Reilly should hang for treason right along side his idol, Obama, as
> part of the cleansing to rid corrupt socialist conspirators from our
> midst.
>
> This week, Ron Paul got the highest number of straw votes for
> President at the CPAC convention. Three years ago Paul could have
> become President simply by saying these words: "The USA is broke
> financially. And the Federal Government is broke morally. No one in
> Washington considers the costs and the negative effects of the
> legislation being passed. With every new law, our civil liberties go
> down, and our share of the national debt goes… up. A logical solution
> to our failed government is to ratify a stronger New Constitution.
> The object of such should be to, once again, put the People in charge
> of government, rather than allowing government to keep thinking it is
> in charge of the People. To further that objective, I hereby RESIGN
> my House Seat in order to work for a better America by way of a New
> Constitution of the United States of America. I urge all patriots who
> agree with me to rally to that cause!"
>
> But Ron Paul shrank back into obscurity amid the empty ritual of the
> Capital after saying, "Elections are for the short term. A Revolution
> will take longer." Ron Paul doesn't have… the (New) Constitution to
> lead a Revolution. But I do!
>
> Two other prominent political or media figures who are clear PHONIES
> are former Governor Mike Huckabee and Former Governor Mitt Romney.
> Both of those are smile-aholics. "One glance at Huckabee's smile
> could give dentists tooth decay!" No man who fakes playing a guitar
> on each of his sweet, sweet shows has the honesty and integrity to be
> a janitor at any church, let alone President of the USA.
>
> Romney showed his true colors after the McCain-Palin ticket was
> finalized. Instead of smiles, I detected POISON in Romney's bearing
> and in his remarks. In my opinion, the 'dual personality' of that man
> disqualifies him to ever be President. This country can't 'take' two
> phony Presidents in a row! Though I never approved of George Bush
> invading Iraq, he was one of our more what-you-see-is what-you-get
> presidents. We should look for that kind of honesty in future
> presidents!
>
> Of the 'possibles' for President, Newt Gingrich has many plusses. The
> man is smart and well-informed. There is a pleasantness and a
> seriousness in his bearing and delivery of message. He has a stable,
> reassuring quality, and an honest candor that makes the listener feel
> they are getting the truth, never a run-around.
>
> The Donald has the smarts and the "Presidential Bearing" to be
> President. However, for leading a bankrupt nation, I'd shy away from
> anyone who has made borrowing money to get out of business binds an…
> art form. The USA cannot… borrow (or print) any more money! Only
> massive cutbacks (75%) will save us from our debt. Having "nice"
> police and "nice" librarians lose their jobs shouldn't be a
> catastrophe if the removal of burdensome restrictions on businesses in
> this country creates another post war (WW II) boom. By working and
> saving during a booming economy, most people can provide for their own
> "security" for the future. Private insurance, shopped across state
> lines, should replace Medicare and Medicaid—which were so bankrupting
> this country, even before Obama came on the screen.
>
> 45% of those polled think Obama is doing OK as President. Those same
> people, probably without exception, voted for the tyrant. In two
> year's time, none of them have had the vision to see that Obama is the
> height of HYPOCRISY, insincerity, deceit, dishonesty, duplicity and
> self-love. He stabs America in the back while showing his toothy
> smile and wearing his tailored suits and ties. In short, he is a
> traitor!
>
> The core of the 45% are the 90% of Black block voters who gladly do
> whatever the typical anti-America church that they go to tells them is
> fine. They willingly turn their backs on the 55% of Americans who for
> too long have been financing the corrupted programs of government.
> Blacks don't "love thy neighbor" like the Bible says, but love
> themselves while waiting to GET the (stolen) taxed-away assets of
> others. So, Blacks love the criminals, like most of them are willing
> to be.
>
> Glenn Beck supposes that mod violence like happened in Egypt could
> happen here. I used to suppose that there are "core" survivalists out
> there who hate government so much that they would have begun the
> cleansing processes already. In the past, some have proposed that our
> Government will start toeing-the-line, if Americans will simply STOP
> paying the excessive taxes. Those who do pay the increasing taxes
> must truly love their neighbors, the 45% who hope to do little or no
> work in the future because of the… charity of the 55%.
>
> Folks, think about how "American" taxpayers are to so willingly accept
> being overtaxed for the benefit of the lazy 45% of our neighbors.
> Perhaps I dream to consider how wonderful it would be if everyone who
> is able would not be a burden to anyone else. Are there any Blacks
> out there who can heed that call? The decision to "love thy neighbor"
> is for each of the 45% to make.
>
> My recently published book explains how having a prosperous free
> enterprise system can benefit the vast majority of Americans. The
> title is: "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity." I hope
> many of you, including racial minorities, will get a copy from Amazon
> or B. & N.
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 11:38 pm, NoEinstein <
noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Folks: Understanding the fix the USA is in will be easier if more of
> > you can read my highly expert analysis of Barack Obama's and Ronald
> > Reagan's handwriting. Please talk about what I'm saying. For too
> > long, people in this country have been letting the media crooks do
> > most of the talking.
>
> > 8/05/08
>
> > Dear Tom: No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan
> > and Barack Obama! If you haven't read, I am a lifelong graphologist—
> > one of, if not the best analyzers of handwriting in the entire World!
> > Ronald Reagan's handwriting shows someone with a nervous temperament.
> > But that's not a "losing it" nervous temperament like John McCain
> > has. Reagan was a conventional thinking man; i.e., his value system
> > was like that of most good people. His personality showed that he was
> > responding to pressures from various fronts, but he could bend rather
> > than break. What that means is: Reagan never compromised his
> > principles! Those who show a legible, normal-sized and formed
> > writing, that also have a nervous but controlled temperament, are salt-
> > of-the-Earth people!
> > Reagan's letter forms were legible, but not fussily exact. That
> > means that he was practical-minded and not overly concerned with
>
