Good Afternoon John,
Like Jonathan, Michael, and Mark, I too would like to see your New Constitution that you ave talked about for at least several years.
Yes, I realize that you have posted various parts and pieces of this document, but why not post the damn thing, for us to read and try to understand?
Why the hesitation? Are you concerned about some sort of copyright infringement? If that is the case, then I can understand.....To a degree, and you need only state that this is the cause of your hesitation.
Although I disagree with Michael (MJ) on a number of occasions, I will say that he is a well thought, well meaning and logical gentleman and not one who is apt to hurl insult or personal attacks on the board.
Just a thought, but obviously we'd love to see your work!
KeithInTampa (Today)
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:30 PM, NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Folks: The following was prompted by a direct email to me. (See
below.) I'd like to share it with you. — John A. Armistead —
Patriot
02/19/11
Dear Robert (Prezioso):
My first essay 'title-set" on Political Forum was: "Start the
Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!" Apparently,
even the concept of there being a revolution tired most people out.
They want others to fight their battles for them—even while this
country is going-down-the-tubes.
The absolute shortest way to correct our broke government and corrupt
institutions is by ratifying my STRONG New Constitution. It's true
that IF our elected officials had sincerely adhered to the ideals of
the Founding Fathers, that are expressed in the original Constitution,
we wouldn't have many of today's problems. Unfortunately, Congress
and the White House pay lip-service to the Constitution while ignoring
most of it, most of the time. They are our elected dictators, not our
elected representatives.
Our bad government is mostly just a huge personnel problem. The bad
personnel began making big promises to the lazy minorities in society
in order to get enough votes to keep getting elected. It's easy to
fault the "fat cats" when the lazy outnumber the former a hundred to
one.
Please understand that I have my own agendas which prevent me from
being an active supporter of your "Save the Country" effort. If
enough people, like you, will start talking about straightening out
government, the powers-that-be will come tumbling down. I'll capsule
your long reply so that others can read it, too.
Sincerely, — John A. Armistead — Patriot
__________
----- Original Message -----
From: robert prezioso
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 1:23 AM
Subject: I agree there is no answer for that Constitution.
You seem to realize that our government has over-stepped its rights
over the people of this country. As I look at it, the way this
happened is we are too worried about who is getting what from the
government. On the one hand—the government hand—it keeps us separated
so we may not be able to protect ourselves from the attacks on us
every day by the political machines. Do Not Get Me Wrong! I Love
This Great Country, and I did service the military. But I feel that
the government has been taken away from the people and is now only for
themselves. Just look at what they get paid for doing nothing. They
don't even work all year, and the expenses are all on us. Every rep.
and sen. gets paid from $150,000 to almost $200,000 a year for doing
things that we would be put in jail for.
If you get a chance, go to my free site. Hey, everybody has to rant
and vent when it comes to the government. I want to start a new
political party to take the government back for the people and restore
the original constitution of the United States which truly gave us the
power, and where the words: "We The People" mean something. The link,
below, is the site. Please email any comments that could help me
improve the content of my site. You seem to be one of the more down-
to-reality people that I have encountered so far in this forum.
Please check this out at: http://nownationalorgazationofthewolf.weebly.com/
Thanks for reading, even if you do not go to the site.
Bob Prezioso
>
On Feb 13, 11:26 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Love thy neighbor, or love thy criminals.
>
> Polls taken throughout Barack Obama's tenure as our elected dictator
> show that a consistent 40% to 45% think he is doing OK as… President.
> That contrasts with as few as 16% of Americans who approve of Obama's
> handling of the US economy. Why isn't there a parallel between those
> two polling questions? Can one's rating as President not take into
> account both overall performance and specific performance?
>
> In 2004 I had heard glowing reports of an attractive Black man from
> Chicago who, supposedly, was delivering rousing speeches. So, I made
> it a point to listen when Obama addressed the Democratic Convention
> that year. My reaction wasn't favorable. The words of the speech
> were OK, but Obama was stony-faced and emotionless. He talked in a
> modified monotone—dropping his voice at the end of sentences as though
> his energy had drained out. The most noticeable aspect of his
> bearing, as a speaker, was the regularity with which he turned his
> head from side to side while reading teleprompters. Though he was
> articulate sounding, Obama didn't seem to be enjoying the message he
> was delivering. Where there is real passion, usually there are
> changes in speaking tone, changes in body language, and apt
> gesturing. Obama showed none of those. Whoever that 'attractive
> Black man from Chicago' was, he was keeping the true identity of the
> speaker hidden from public view. That fact made me feel very uneasy,
> mostly, because other people, apparently, were only seeing the
> slender, suave and handsome man, and not seeing the likely psychosis
> lurking below that man's surface.
>
> Bill Kristol of the 'Weekly Standard', a supposed conservative
> magazine, is a regular 'guest contributor' on Fox News. On Chris
> Wallace's show, Sunday, Kristol was his usual smiley self while he
> defended not firing policemen and librarians as part of needed budget
> cuts. Though I've never read a page of that magazine, I could
> immediately tell that Kristol is a liberal. His cast-in-stone smile
> also shows him to be a phony of the worst kind. When I was a kid, my
> father, who was a professional portrait photographer, told me that men
> don't smile 'naturally', without being coaxed. I've observed that men
> who are not trustworthy will smile excessively to created the opposite
> illusion.
>
> Bill O'Reilly smiles and chuckles his way though most of his shows.
> After interviewing Obama the night of the Super Bowl, O'Reilly said
> that Obama—who was all toothy-smiles the entire interview—is a
> friendly and likable man (gag… gag…). O'Reilly is this liberal
> Harvard luck-out with a moron's IQ telling his like-minded viewers
> that THE most divisive and hurtful man to the country in US history
> is… likable. Regularly doing that on national TV, as O'Reilly does,
> is, I believe, aiding and abetting treason. For that reason, Bill
> O'Reilly should hang for treason right along side his idol, Obama, as
> part of the cleansing to rid corrupt socialist conspirators from our
> midst.
>
> This week, Ron Paul got the highest number of straw votes for
> President at the CPAC convention. Three years ago Paul could have
> become President simply by saying these words: "The USA is broke
> financially. And the Federal Government is broke morally. No one in
> Washington considers the costs and the negative effects of the
> legislation being passed. With every new law, our civil liberties go
> down, and our share of the national debt goes… up. A logical solution
> to our failed government is to ratify a stronger New Constitution.
> The object of such should be to, once again, put the People in charge
> of government, rather than allowing government to keep thinking it is
> in charge of the People. To further that objective, I hereby RESIGN
> my House Seat in order to work for a better America by way of a New
> Constitution of the United States of America. I urge all patriots who
> agree with me to rally to that cause!"
>
> But Ron Paul shrank back into obscurity amid the empty ritual of the
> Capital after saying, "Elections are for the short term. A Revolution
> will take longer." Ron Paul doesn't have… the (New) Constitution to
> lead a Revolution. But I do!
>
> Two other prominent political or media figures who are clear PHONIES
> are former Governor Mike Huckabee and Former Governor Mitt Romney.
> Both of those are smile-aholics. "One glance at Huckabee's smile
> could give dentists tooth decay!" No man who fakes playing a guitar
> on each of his sweet, sweet shows has the honesty and integrity to be
> a janitor at any church, let alone President of the USA.
>
> Romney showed his true colors after the McCain-Palin ticket was
> finalized. Instead of smiles, I detected POISON in Romney's bearing
> and in his remarks. In my opinion, the 'dual personality' of that man
> disqualifies him to ever be President. This country can't 'take' two
> phony Presidents in a row! Though I never approved of George Bush
> invading Iraq, he was one of our more what-you-see-is what-you-get
> presidents. We should look for that kind of honesty in future
> presidents!
>
> Of the 'possibles' for President, Newt Gingrich has many plusses. The
> man is smart and well-informed. There is a pleasantness and a
> seriousness in his bearing and delivery of message. He has a stable,
> reassuring quality, and an honest candor that makes the listener feel
> they are getting the truth, never a run-around.
>
> The Donald has the smarts and the "Presidential Bearing" to be
> President. However, for leading a bankrupt nation, I'd shy away from
> anyone who has made borrowing money to get out of business binds an…
> art form. The USA cannot… borrow (or print) any more money! Only
> massive cutbacks (75%) will save us from our debt. Having "nice"
> police and "nice" librarians lose their jobs shouldn't be a
> catastrophe if the removal of burdensome restrictions on businesses in
> this country creates another post war (WW II) boom. By working and
> saving during a booming economy, most people can provide for their own
> "security" for the future. Private insurance, shopped across state
> lines, should replace Medicare and Medicaid—which were so bankrupting
> this country, even before Obama came on the screen.
>
> 45% of those polled think Obama is doing OK as President. Those same
> people, probably without exception, voted for the tyrant. In two
> year's time, none of them have had the vision to see that Obama is the
> height of HYPOCRISY, insincerity, deceit, dishonesty, duplicity and
> self-love. He stabs America in the back while showing his toothy
> smile and wearing his tailored suits and ties. In short, he is a
> traitor!
>
> The core of the 45% are the 90% of Black block voters who gladly do
> whatever the typical anti-America church that they go to tells them is
> fine. They willingly turn their backs on the 55% of Americans who for
> too long have been financing the corrupted programs of government.
> Blacks don't "love thy neighbor" like the Bible says, but love
> themselves while waiting to GET the (stolen) taxed-away assets of
> others. So, Blacks love the criminals, like most of them are willing
> to be.
>
> Glenn Beck supposes that mod violence like happened in Egypt could
> happen here. I used to suppose that there are "core" survivalists out
> there who hate government so much that they would have begun the
> cleansing processes already. In the past, some have proposed that our
> Government will start toeing-the-line, if Americans will simply STOP
> paying the excessive taxes. Those who do pay the increasing taxes
> must truly love their neighbors, the 45% who hope to do little or no
> work in the future because of the… charity of the 55%.
>
> Folks, think about how "American" taxpayers are to so willingly accept
> being overtaxed for the benefit of the lazy 45% of our neighbors.
> Perhaps I dream to consider how wonderful it would be if everyone who
> is able would not be a burden to anyone else. Are there any Blacks
> out there who can heed that call? The decision to "love thy neighbor"
> is for each of the 45% to make.
>
> My recently published book explains how having a prosperous free
> enterprise system can benefit the vast majority of Americans. The
> title is: "The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity." I hope
> many of you, including racial minorities, will get a copy from Amazon
> or B. & N.
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 11:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Folks: Understanding the fix the USA is in will be easier if more of
> > you can read my highly expert analysis of Barack Obama's and Ronald
> > Reagan's handwriting. Please talk about what I'm saying. For too
> > long, people in this country have been letting the media crooks do
> > most of the talking.
>
> > 8/05/08
>
> > Dear Tom: No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan
> > and Barack Obama! If you haven't read, I am a lifelong graphologist—
> > one of, if not the best analyzers of handwriting in the entire World!
> > Ronald Reagan's handwriting shows someone with a nervous temperament.
> > But that's not a "losing it" nervous temperament like John McCain
> > has. Reagan was a conventional thinking man; i.e., his value system
> > was like that of most good people. His personality showed that he was
> > responding to pressures from various fronts, but he could bend rather
> > than break. What that means is: Reagan never compromised his
> > principles! Those who show a legible, normal-sized and formed
> > writing, that also have a nervous but controlled temperament, are salt-
> > of-the-Earth people!
> > Reagan's letter forms were legible, but not fussily exact. That
> > means that he was practical-minded and not overly concerned with
>> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment