The Gullible, Naive Right Wing

September26th
The Gullible, Naive Right Wing
Tom Woods

Well, at least the phony neoconservative variety.  In his book Washington Rules, Andrew Bacevich, with me a contributing editor of The American Conservative, puts his finger on Americans' (though especially neocons') eagerness to embrace fantasy and propaganda when it comes to foreign affairs:

As a boy growing up in the Midwest during the early years of the Cold War, I developed a clear understanding of what differentiated Americans from their communist adversaries.  Simply put, we were pragmatists and they were ideologues. On our side flexibility and common sense prevailed; whatever worked, we were for it. In contrast, the people on the other side were rigid and dogmatic; bombast and posturing mattered more than results. The newsreels of the time told the tale: Communist leaders barked ridiculous demands; the docile masses chanted prescribed slogans. It was impossible to imagine Americans tolerating such nonsense.

However belatedly, learning has overturned these youthful impressions. "Whatever works" no longer seems to guide everyday American behavior, if it ever did.  Americans view it as their birthright that reality should satisfy desire. Forget e pluribus unum. "Whatever I want" has become the operative national motto.  In the meantime, when it comes to politics, Americans do put up with nonsense.  Week in and week out, members of a jaded governing class, purporting to speak for "the American people," mouth tired cliches that would have caused members of the Soviet Politburo to blush with embarrassment….

The world -- we are incessantly told -- is becoming ever smaller, more complex, and more dangerous. Therefore, it becomes necessary for the nation to intensify the efforts undertaken to "keep America safe," while also, of course, advancing the cause of world peace. Achieving these aims -- it is said -- requires the United States to funnel ever greater sums of money to the Pentagon to develop new means of projecting power, and to hold itself in readiness for new expeditions deemed essential to pacify (or liberate) some dark and troubled quarter of the globe….

At a deeper level [than merely monetary costs], the costs of adhering to the Washington consensus defy measurement: families shattered by loss; veterans bearing the physical or psychological scars of combat, the perpetuation of ponderous bureaucracies subsisting in a climate of secrecy, dissembling, and outright deception; the distortion of national priorities as the military-industrial complex siphons off scarce resources; environmental devastation produced as a by-product of war and the preparation for war; the evisceration of civic culture that results when a small praetorian guard shoulders the burden of waging perpetual war, while the great majority of citizens purport to revere its members, even as they ignore or profit from their service.

There's much more, but that's about all I can quote.

http://www.tomwoods.com/blog/the-gullible-naive-right-wing/