I would agree that our foreign policy of, "Nation Building" was misguided and not in the best interests of the United States. I would also call "Nation Building" a form of "Intervention".
There is a distinction however, between "Intervention" and "Isolation". Dr. Paul espouses the latter, and that is just as misplaced as Nation Building. In fact, It's far more dangerous. For Dr. Paul to advocate Iran's nuclear capabilities is just flat out scary. A clear indication that Paul denies the reality of the world today. Dr. Paul is a brilliant guy, he is just flat out misplaced on what constitutes a danger to our Nation.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:22 AM, raymorphic <raymorphic@yahoo.com> wrote:
"It didn't make Dr. Paul any more correct with regard to history, orI'm not sure about the history part; what I refer to as sensible was
his
foreign policy."
the foreign policy solution.
America do not like interventionists foreign policies.
We couldn't run our country well, let alone running other people's
countries.
In addition, we're in no financial position to intervene.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment