> Like I said, contorted and tortured logic. Can you name me ONE
> insurance YOU pay into where you KNOW you CAN'T ever make a claim or
> receive a benefit from?
I never said they couldn't collect on a claim... they first have to
meet the requirements of proof they need it.
> You don't buy car insurance if you don't drive.
> You don't buy homeowner insurance if you don't own a home.
You don't pay into SS if you don't work either.
> You buy insurance to ensure that, should a certain condition occur, you
> can receive compensation for it.
Exactly.
Thanks for making my point, and glad your seeing it my way.
> Under your system the conditions
> under which one would receive compensation from this 'insurance' can
> not exist if that individual is wealthy.
Because they have no basis to make a claim.
> What it is, once you take off
> the blue glasses, is redistribution of wealth poorly disguised as
> 'insurance'.
It has nothing to do with redistribution, that's the nature of
insurance whether private or otherwise.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment