he has always had to 'see' solutions to the problems the Dem's always
harp about. But the man has to be major pro capitalist, because those
are the tenants in his buildings and the ones willing to lend him
hundreds of millions of dollars based on just his quality reputation,
dependable character, and the heavy collateral of his real estate
holdings. That man knows and understands the capitalist system better
than 99% of the public officials in Washington. When the people are
MAD at government, they will favor the honest man who has the balls to
look angry and talk about our... fucking oil problem. When the soft-
skinned Dem's heard V. Pres. Biden "whisper" "f...... big" to Obama,
the first word got bleeped out. When it comes to saving the USA
economy, I'll favor the man with the vision and experience to "fix the
damned ice skating rink." Left, right and independents shouldn't
mind if it takes a few... "f........" to get the job done! — John A.
Armistead — Patriot
On May 3, 10:54 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Bob Dole was a brilliant guy, yet unelectable too.
>
> Hey look. I'm 50, and have seen exactly 2 (TWO!) incumbant presidents
> lose. Thems some freakin' odds man. The senate is a GOP gift (2.3
> time more dem seats up for grabs).
>
> Trump is a dem kiss!
>
> On May 3, 12:10 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Greg: The ones who should "die off" (not be killed off) are the
> > members of Congress who are content with letting unconstitutional
> > political parties pull the strings; who accept unconstitutional,
> > spaced-put primaries; and who think it is OK to have the media, with
> > its weekly polls and 24/7 commentary, have more influence on the
> > outcome of elections than the brainwashed voters suppose that they
> > have. Our government is screwed-up, Greg! Only an angry outsider to
> > the political establishment, like Donald Trump now is, can fire-up the
> > voters. That makes sense, if the voters really want fucking results!
> > — J. A. Armistead —
>
> > On May 2, 11:09 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Let the dems kill off Trump like they did Palin.
>
> > > Its a good thing
>
> > > On May 2, 10:08 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Last week at the White House Correspondents Dinner in Washington,
> > > > 'humorist' Seth Meyers delivered a stream of put-downs of those
> > > > unfortunate enough to be a subject of the liberal media. The people
> > > > doing the most laughing were the most liberal ones in the large group—
> > > > that included self-appointed… 'celebrities' who were somehow 'lucky
> > > > enough' to get a ticket.
>
> > > > The person doing the least laughing at that bash was a possible
> > > > candidate for President, Donald Trump. I immediately wondered why
> > > > Trump would go to such a "roast", when it was so obvious that Barack
> > > > Obama would likely orchestrate the event so as to make issues like his
> > > > bogus birth certificate seem to be light, enjoyable humor in the look-
> > > > the-other-way-to-crime culture of the corrupt Washington
> > > > establishment.
>
> > > > If Donald Trump didn't already know that our two-party political
> > > > system is off-its-kilter, he should surely realize, now, the
> > > > inexcusable leverage the media has in determining who our elected
> > > > officials can be. I've characterized this country's problems as being
> > > > the approximate equal responsibility of: the media, government, and
> > > > our screwed-up public education system from start to finish. Of those
> > > > three, correcting our media will be the most difficult. It will
> > > > likely involve closing down 90% of all media outlets once they violate
> > > > even one on the provisions in my New Constitution:
>
> > > > "Representatives shall not intentionally communicate with any news
> > > > medium whose coverage area is predominately outside of their home
> > > > district. Nor shall they, or any government official, cultivate a
> > > > media personae, or make petty public speeches, introductions or
> > > > comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any civil or private
> > > > projects or those responsible. Comments to media by representatives
> > > > or government employees shall be germane to pending legislation, or to
> > > > the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not solicit public
> > > > officials' opinions over those of the People."
>
> > > > "Other than the President or his agents, no person, news medium,
> > > > organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within government or
> > > > without, shall be allowed to contact representatives while such are in
> > > > Washington."
>
> > > > "Representatives shall not be polled concerning issues up for a vote,
> > > > nor shall Citizens be polled prior to any election on their support
> > > > for any candidate, amendment, or referendum item. It shall be a
> > > > felony to take, or to disseminate, the results of any such poll."
>
> > > > "No release of projected election or referenda results shall be made
> > > > until all polls have been closed one hour."
>
> > > > "It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or media
> > > > idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf of any
> > > > candidate for public office or job."
>
> > > > "English, that is grammatically written and correctly spoken, is the
> > > > official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium
> > > > and every public discourse."
>
> > > > "No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the freedom of
> > > > speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium;
> > > > the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any
> > > > Citizen or group to petition government or any of its branches or
> > > > departments for redress of grievances."
>
> > > > "Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be
> > > > reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth,
> > > > or deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction
> > > > or satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news
> > > > medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is
> > > > prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly
> > > > occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or
> > > > ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as
> > > > being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in
> > > > any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments
> > > > occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would
> > > > come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > > pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside
> > > > of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the
> > > > candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
> > > > provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided
> > > > the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all
> > > > of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
> > > > others, but if a person is harmed by the medium's content, they shall
> > > > be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
> > > > respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
> > > > medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall
> > > > not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
> > > > government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
> > > > being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
> > > > thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
> > > > truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
> > > > commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
> > > > candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
> > > > campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
> > > > felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
> > > > interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
> > > > public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > display active public records without the free consent of the apt
> > > > parties."
>
> > > > Any "serious" candidate for President should be smart enough to
> > > > realize that the elitist media has no constitutional right to have an
> > > > influence on the outcome of an election that is greater than the per
> > > > capita votes of those employed in the media. In short, ALL political
> > > > commentary regarding pending elections or referenda shall be stopped!
> > > > Never more shall any candidate, or possible candidate, for public
> > > > office be the subject of inconsiderate humor or innuendo. And when a
> > > > cad like Britt Hume expresses his personal opinion that… 'Donald Trump
> > > > has no chance of becoming President', Hume would be immediately fired,
> > > > or Fox News would be permanently closed down for not being in the best
> > > > interest of the people.
>
> > > > When Donald Trump looks with disfavor on what is going on in our…
> > > > fucking government, there might be a GLIMMER of hope that the "Empty
> > > > Ritual" in politics, and elsewhere in the world, will finally be
> > > > experiencing the "Wring-the-neck" that has been so long overdue.
>
> > > > Respectfully submitted,
>
> > > > — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > AKA NoEinstein on Google's sci.physics news group.
>
> > > > Those who are interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest
> > > > Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity" available at Amazon, and Barnes
> > > > and Noble.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment