On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashleyii@lavabit.com> wrote:
John,
So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that differs from yours. How fascist of you!
On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM. The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how great Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama. What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about a candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or their network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a game with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a candidate say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the people! — J. A. A. —On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:John, You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do. That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean when you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more influence at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course, that shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and democracy." Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means and why someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your world. And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum is about up. On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:Jonathan: Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities vote. The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles than the man-on-the-street. Of course, that shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and democracy. The 1st Amendment says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium". Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark is allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because I correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if Google didn't FIRE Mark, post haste! � J. A. A. �-- Freedom Is Always Illegal. Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft <http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment