You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean when you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more influence at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course, that shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and democracy."
Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means and why someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your world.
And, John, you'd better do it fast. I think your time on this forum is about up.
On 04/08/2011 09:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
Jonathan: Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have a "following" which would be cesseptable to vote like the celebrities vote. The means celebrities would have more influence at the poles than the man-on-the-street. Of course, that shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and democracy. The 1st Amendment says: "... the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium". Having a pro-democracy press means that no one like Mark is allowed to push socialism nor communism. His threatening me because I correctly peg him as anti-America, would shut down Google, if Google didn't FIRE Mark, post haste! — J. A. A. —
No comments:
Post a Comment