little string-pulling by government. Read the half page or so of
restrictions in my New Constitution on what kind of laws can be
passed. Government will start getting SMALLER, not bigger! — J. A.
A. —
On Apr 22, 4:39 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> Most everything people do is done on a voluntary basis - no government
> required.
>
> On 04/22/2011 01:33 PM, Mark wrote:
>
> > And it still functions without the lawmakers.... Go figure.
>
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Ashley
> > <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> > wrote:
>
> > John,
>
> > "In terms of comparative social spending on welfare-related
> > programs as a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP),
> > Denmark ranks first, spending more than 29 percent of GDP on its
> > welfare-related programs. Next is Sweden (nearly 29 percent),
> > followed by France, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, and
> > Finland. The United Kingdom ranks in the middle of the pack in
> > 13th place (nearly 22 percent of GDP). The United States ranks
> > near the bottom, in 26th place (out of 29), spending less than 15
> > percent of its GDP on social welfare programs. The United States
> > ranks just ahead of Ireland, Mexico, and South Korea."
>
> > http://pagerankstudio.com/Blog/2011/03/what-is-welfare-state/
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > On 04/22/2011 08:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >> On average, yes they are! Few in Belgium look to government for
> >> handouts. In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout.
> >> Anything over 5% is excessive. But that's why I've written my New
> >> Constitution�to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings
> >> business! � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >> On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those in
> >>> the United States?
>
> >>>> J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> >>>> in civil war... � J. A. A. �
> >>>> On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> John,
> >>>>> It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> >>>>> government. Belgium has been without a national government for more than
> >>>>> 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make much
> >>>>> of a difference in their daily lives."
> >>>>> On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>> Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> >>>>>> conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> >>>>>> because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> >>>>>> deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> >>>>>> opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
> >>>>>> than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> >>>>>> within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
> >>>>>> no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> >>>>>> having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>> On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> >>>>>>> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> >>>>>>> questions posed to you.)
> >>>>>>> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> >>>>>>>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> >>>>>>>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> >>>>>>>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
> >>>>>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> >>>>>>>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government should
> >>>>>>>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask
> >>>>>>>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> >>>>>>>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are
> >>>>>>>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites based
> >>>>>>>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> >>>>>>>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression means.
> >>>>>>>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
> >>>>>>>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> >>>>>>>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off this
> >>>>>>>>>>> tremendous task?
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> >>>>>>>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> >>>>>>>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> >>>>>>>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>>>>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>>>>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>>>>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> >>>>>>>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>>>>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> >>>>>>>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> <mailto:markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> <mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com> <mailto:keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey John!
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment