Re: Why in the world would the NYT print this story - why not just point a finger at the CIA agents and tell the Libyans there they are

On Apr 1, 2:37 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Not any more.  Question is should it have been in the first place.  Next
> question is who leaked it to the NYT and why and who told them to, who
> is behind the leak at the ultimate end.  I just find it strange that the
> NYT feels entitled to release anything like this with what was said
> about it to begin with.  If it was secret, if it was clandestine, if it
> was authorized for the CIA to act, then it should not be up to the NYT
> to decide to print the info.
>
> On 04/01/2011 11:20 AM, GregfromBoston wrote:
>
>
>
> > Note that the president has issued a secret finding - authorize the
> > CIA - clandestine effort.  What part of that tells us that the
> > president
> > wants this broadcast to the world.  Note the word secret, CIA,
> > clandestine.  Which of those words do you not understand.
> > -------------------------------------
>
> > If you're reading about it in the New York Times, its neither
> > clandestine nor secret.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.