as... "strange" that someone with a Doctor of Law Degree would wind up
moderating a lowly Political Forum. The 'climate' in this country
must be right for making STRUCTURAL changes to our government, before
anything will get considered. Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh like to
talk about the problems, but, so far, no one in the media has been
willing to state that Barack Obama has violated our existing
Constitution so badly that he's guilty of treason. I'm pretty sure
that the birth certificate someone on CNN claims to have seen was a
forgery. I want to have Obama's footprint, now, compared to that
(somebody) baby's footprint. There won't be a match. Also, the names
of the physician who delivered the baby would be shown. Someone in
that delivery room is still alive and should be telling the world that
they helped deliver a... President! But there are no such people to
be found. Obama's grandfather, purportedly, was the person who picked
up, and retained the certificate. If so, his fingerprints should be
on it. But don't bet on it. That certificate is no more than three
years old, though the paper may... "carbon date" as older. I'm with
the Donald on this one. When the footprint doesn't match, Obama
should be hanged for TREASON within 30 days. Finding a noose small
enough to fit his neck will be a problem! — J. A. Armistead —
>
On Mar 29, 3:56 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> <Grin>!
>
> Guten Abend John!
>
> Uhm....I will admit that on occasion, I might take some literary license
> here and there, on message boards such as Political Forum as well as in
> e-mails, but in general, I will match my command of the Queen's
> English with yours...As well as my knowledge of history, ideological
> thought, prespective and understanding. Most especially, I will match my
> knowledge and understanding of substantive and common law with yours...Any
> day of the week, any hour of the day!
>
> Mark "The Annointed One" Kahle? Mark is a closet conservative, who
> sometimes gets confused! <Grin Again>! MJ & Jonathan? Both conservative
> libertarians who border on anarchy. All of which are thoughtful,
> intelligent folks, and who basically have called you on the carpet. That
> is one of the great things about this once large, but dwindling group. You
> cannot talk a good game in here, you must actually back up and support your
> rhetoric! You Sir, were confronted several times with legitimate questions,
> of which you could not answer, by the likes of Jonathan, MJ and Mark.
>
> I enjoy ya John! I think you bring up some rather interesting points and
> propositions, but the three guys who you continue to talk smack to, and all
> who have asked you in general, one question that you seem to dodge and don't
> want to address; (and I am paraphrasing here) : "How Do You Expect To Get
> Your New Constitution Ratified, If No One Is Allowed To Read It And Discuss
> Its Merits?"
>
> For two months now, and after over three hundred messages, in at least five
> or six different threads, all captioned similarly,,,Something to do
> with "*Wringing
> The Necks Of Empty Rituals*"; we've watched you dance and dodge legitimate
> questions while simultaneously poking and prodding your questioners; all the
> while, Jonathan's and Michael's "Signature Quotes" continued to get larger,
> bigger, and longer!
>
> It's been fun, but let's move on!
>
> Humbly,
>
> KeithInKöln
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:49 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Keith: In the USA we have the right to self defense. If, in
> > defending myself, I must use the same bullets to dispatch those bent
> > on doing me, or others in this country harm, no one can declare
> > otherwise. I know that Mark is a God-damned liberal. And you could
> > well be a wolf in sheep's clothing. I sincerely doubt that a person
> > with a Doctor of Law Degree would be content to co-moderate anything
> > with the likes of Mark. Also, your use of the English language falls
> > below that of most lawyers. Google is largely controlled by
> > liberals. When my New Constitution starts being so viciously attacked
> > by liberals, that is proof that my document is accomplishing its
> > intended purpose: "Returning control of government to the People; and
> > removing all controlling influences by biased groups." If my
> > accomplishing those ends upsets you, that is your problem, not mine.
> > I wasn't put on this Earth for recreational bantering with mental
> > lightweights on any subject. Learn or leave, that is the readers'
> > option on MY original posts! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > On Mar 28, 12:02 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Guten Abend from Köln, John,
>
> > > You are incorrect in your assessment. Yes, PoliticalForum is moderated.
> > As
> > > a matter of fact, you have been warned by Mark "The Annointed One"
> > > Kahle, who co-moderates PoliticalForum with me, that your continuous
> > > "Spam", (and if you don't know the definition of "Spam"; I suggest that
> > > you look at PoliticalForum's Rules & Guidelines, which can be found here:
> >http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/web/political-forum-dec...
> > > ) should cease. By that, I mean that today, you have submitted three
> > > messages within seven minutes, and countless other messages for the past
> > > month that are identical....Something to the effect of: "MJ, The Party
> > > Crasher", YadaYadaYada..."
>
> > > We get it. We got it three weeks ago. You don't want to post your "New
> > > Constitution"; you don't want to address those individuals who have
> > posed
> > > legitimate questions regarding the content of your New Constitution, and
> > > you consider any criticism to your proposed "New Constitution" spurious.
>
> > > There is a gamut of issues, events, scenarios, assholes, theologies,
> > > considerations, and baseball that could be discussed, and that we would
> > > love to hear your opinion on. Shit can the canned responses.
>
> > > By the same token, all of ya'll who have these lovely, quippy
> > signatures,
> > > that are usually longer than whatever it is that you are posting, are
> > also
> > > getting a bit stale. Just as important, wiping the previous embedded
> > text
> > > in the message that you are writing, saves a lot of time when scrolling
> > and
> > > trying to find the newest post in the thread.
>
> > > Thanks for all of your consideration!
>
> > > KeithInKöln
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment