New Constitution and how such would be apt to events in the news would
fill several "War and Peace"-size novels. Not a single WORD of what I
have written supports socialism nor communism! I am in favor of
having a super-efficient, minimum-size government that has close to
zero interaction with individual citizens. 'My' government will no
longer keep records on the law-abiding citizens, because taxes will be
value-added, only. And I have nixed having the government maintain
records of criminal investigations of anyone found to be innocent.
Those on-file records tend to prejudice law enforcement to "convict"
the person they failed to convict the last time. My corrections of
corrupt law enforcement practices, alone, should be justification
enough to ratify my New Constitution! Presently, the USA is a police
state—with the strings being pulled by corrupt public figures. And
the courts have done whatever the political leaders dictate. I've put
them in their place, big time!
You, MJ, are little more than a party-crasher. I do not appreciate in
the least having you post your elementary version of "A" constitution
of some kind. Post your God-damned junk constitution under your name,
not mine. I am not playing games, here. If you would like to get
back into anyone's good graces, explain your political philosophy in
two paragraphs or less. Unless I see the words: "I pro-capitalist
and anti-socialist"… included, then I will know for sure that you are
just some HACKER who is back-dooring your socialist-communist ideals.
Anyone who says anything at all negative about my ideals can only be
the latter. — J. A. A. —
>
On Feb 23, 9:40 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> In case anyone missed it ... anyone who ASKS to
> see this 'Constitution' ... is labelled as a socialist-communist.
> My guess is that this Constitution upholds,
> endorses and hails ... socialism. THAT is the
> true reason Armistead does not want to post it OR let anyone 'see it'.
> Pity.
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> "We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the
> consequences of evading reality" -- Alyssa Rosenbaum
>
> At 09:33 PM 2/23/2011, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Dear Jonathan: Get this and get this good: Your "pushy" attitude on
> >MY post about MY New Constitution pegs you as a likely socialist-
> >communist. You are not wanted here, nor anywhere else in the USA! —
> >John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> >On Feb 23, 2:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >wrote:
> > > How does John expect to implement his New Constitution if no one is ever
> > > allowed to read it? He sounds like a wanna-be dictator in the making.
>
> > > On 2/23/2011 11:45 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
> > > > That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
> > > > scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone
> > > > else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the
> > > > entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this
> > > > or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with
> > > > our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
> > > > speak from personal experience that few if any other person could
> > > > have
> > > > had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick
> > > > out of office any public official or employee, including the
> > > > President
> > > > himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of
> > > > a
> > > > single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To wit:
>
> > > > Substitute "Obamacare" and thats what the DEMS slammed down your
> > > > throats.
>
> > > > On Feb 22, 11:07 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > >> Dear Keith: Thanks for your rational-toned reply. My New
> > > >> Constitution will indeed be copyrighted. But only those parts of it
> > > >> not copied and adapted from the original, public-domain document.
> > > >> This isn't being done for making money from the sale of copies, but to
> > > >> be sure no crazies print 'modified copies' that would, maliciously,
> > > >> make me look bad�as part of a socialist/communist plot to side-track
> > > >> my efforts.
>
> > > >> I'm not sure you nor others realize that my document has, for fourteen
> > > >> years, withstood the test of correcting the daily crises highlighted
> > > >> in the news, and the regular injustices coming from our courts. What
> > > >> is included is at least ten times broader in scope than the original
> > > >> constitution. Realize that I have had the advantage (over the
> > > >> Founding Fathers) of seeing what has and what hasn't worked with our
> > > >> Constitution.
>
> > > >> That 40% of my New Constitution which has been made public has
> > > >> scarcely been commented on. I am NOT wishing to have your nor anyone
> > > >> else's feedback on what I have written! Most would love to see the
> > > >> entire document so that they can make grandiose criticisms about this
> > > >> or that. From my personal life, I have had head-to-head run-ins with
> > > >> our corrupt state, local, and federal governments that allow me to
> > > >> speak from personal experience that few if any other person could have
> > > >> had. That is why my New Constitution will immediately fire or kick
> > > >> out of office any public official or employee, including the President
> > > >> himself, who does not respond appropriately for a logical request of a
> > > >> single law-abiding citizen for the redress of a grievance. To wit:
>
> > > >> "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > >> peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > >> government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > >> be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
> > > >> freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or
> > > >> other medium; the right of People to peaceably assemble; *** and the
> > > >> right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its
> > > >> branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so
> > > >> petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely,
> > > >> comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities who
> > > >> have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of
> > > >> the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure
> > > >> to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall,
> > > >> on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one�s employment,
> > > >> especially those in management or public office�including judges and
> > > >> justices�who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent
> > > >> Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly
> > > >> addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No
> > > >> judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above required
> > > >> duties, that they in any way might be compromising their objectivity
> > > >> or fairness in court; justice be not �blind�, but well informed.
> > > >> Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable
> > > >> truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or
> > > >> deliberate omission of the truth�except in cases of obvious fiction or
> > > >> satire�is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news
> > > >> medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is
> > > >> prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly
> > > >> occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or
> > > >> ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as
> > > >> being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in
> > > >> any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments
> > > >> occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would
> > > >> come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > >> innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > >> its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > >> job to hawk their personal political preferences�at risk of loss of
> > > >> license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > >> promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > >> analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > >> pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside
> > > >> of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the
> > > >> candidates or referenda issues�on an as occurs basis�is allowed,
> > > >> provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided
> > > >> the same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all
> > > >> of the referenda issues. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > >> truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > >> medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
> > > >> others, but if a person is harmed by the medium�s content, they shall
> > > >> be allowed to reply�without editing�in
> > that medium. Each medium shall
> > > >> respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
> > > >> medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall
> > > >> not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
> > > >> government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment�
> > > >> being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
> > > >> thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
> > > >> truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
> > > >> commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
> > > >> candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
> > > >> campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
> > > >> felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
> > > >> interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
> > > >> public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
> > > >> display active public records without the free consent of the apt
> > > >> parties."
>
> > > >> Keith, the above should highlight the extreme attention to detail I've
> > > >> put into my document. No person, by a casual comment, shall have the
> > > >> "right" to denigrate my efforts. The following proviso is at the
> > > >> closing of my New Constitution:
>
> > > >> "Notes: (1.) *Italicized text represents portions of the New
> > > >> Constitution which shall be omitted unless separately and specifically
> > > >> approved by 60% of the voters. Voting to approve the New Constitution
> > > >> shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or
> > > >> business which polls the People on their support or non support of
> > > >> this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
> > > >> shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
> > > >> standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
> > > >> document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
> > > >> People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein�
> > > >> including the full punishments relating thereto�for non compliance
> > > >> with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
> > > >> this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
> > > >> the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
> > > >> will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!"
>
> > > >> � John A. Armistead �
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment