to power to tell them what they "have to" do with their profits.
I can't find it.
On Feb 8, 2:53 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 6:15 pm, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > He's wrong. Change "have to", to "should", and he's good.
>
> Much like where Bush Jr. talked to Wall Street Financial CEO's and
> told them; "they *should* lend more to businesses in order to create
> more jobs".
>
> They didn't.
> He was just as wrong as Obama will be.
> These semantics mean nothing and amount to nothing more than worthless
> symbolism.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment