Hello John!
Who was the Senator, and what felonious act did he do?
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Dear Readers:
It continues to enlighten me how "right-on" many of my previous
essays, relating to my odyssey to save the USA, have been. Here is
one which I wrote to counter the LIE that Tim Russert had been an
admirable public figure:
6/24/08
TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT'S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA.
Many would suppose that it is… the 'American way' to advance from a
lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the 'most watched'
leaders of the media. But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as
they come. Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on
the 'weaknesses' of his many guests. And he sometimes punctuated
those attacks with looks of cynicism. But, getting good Nelson
Ratings shouldn't be the standard by which any media figure is judged.
While Russet's star was just rising, I had the 'inside scoop' on
felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators.
Sounds like… 'news', doesn't it? But over several years—while I kept
trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the-
core. To wit: The media assumes that so-called 'public figures'
aren't required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other
citizens.
Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who 'attacked' his news
stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included
pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5" floppy disks. But
Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media 'icons' whom I
contacted would even consider that… 'news' might come from someone who
isn't a celebrity. What gets covered as news in this country must
pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through. It
is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the
top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert
as anti-American. The tacit role of the media is to inform the
Citizens. Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias and
egotistical elitism.
The media is comforted by its united front. These days, there are no
maverick investigative reporters. I should know; I've looked high and
low! CNN contributor, Carl Bernstein, once made a splash by helping
to break Watergate. But he won't make 'a ripple', now, to let it be
told that I have disproved Einstein's theories of relativity. And
Bernstein isn't interested in breaking a story—much more important
than Watergate ever was—that none of the twenty plus universities
which I have contacted care to correct the errors in their teaching
which the trusting public just assumes are error free. In effect, the
media is protecting the status quo both in government, and in
education. And that is why the media is the one 'institution' most
threatening to the survival of the USA. It is even MORE threatening
than all of our failed governments combined!
In addition to my seeking justice via the media for my injuries due to
that… US senator, I also tried to seek justice by contacting the likes
of Al Gore, while he was President of the Senate. And I contacted the
US Justice Department, and eventually, the Chief Justice of the US
Supreme Court. None of those, and dozens more like them, care to hold
any public figure accountable for felonious acts. Such a realization
is what prompted me to write a New Constitution. The primary purpose
of such is to kick out the rascals in Washington, a little at a time,
by restricting our representatives—other than our President and V.
Pres.—to those who have NEVER held any public office at the local,
state, or federal levels. Career politicians are verboten!
George W. Bush is a lame duck whose public esteem is about as low as
it can go. But to his credit, Bush is one of the best from-the-heart
speakers. The man has great speech writers. Even though the words he
expresses aren't always his own, his comments seem genuine—like he
cares. I admit that I don't listen anytime that Bush talks about… his
war. His caring, there, is less than ideal. But if I could go hiking
or fishing with Bush, that would be something special.
Part of the reason George Bush 'won' in 2000 was because he got the
endorsement of that felonious US senator whom I've alluded to, above.
Bush praised that senator, even after I had written to Bush—as I did
to every state governor in the USA, apprising him, and all of them, of
the senator's apt crime(s). Apparently, politicians, and the media,
are more than willing to look the other way to the wrongful acts of
public figures. They seem to know, intuitively, that their own
chances of escaping civil retribution for bad deeds goes way up if
they will only look-the-other-way to the wrongs done by public
figures.
After George W. Bush failed to act morally regarding that felonious
senator, I immediately wrote to Senator John McCain. I informed
McCain that he could easily win the Republican nomination if he would
just explain to the media that Bush had knowingly praised and embraced
a felonious senator. I don't know what… 'dirt' the Republican party
had on McCain, but he passed up the last and the best hope he has ever
had to become President… and that was before the loss of much of his
mental wherewithal—which will prevent him from winning the present
presidential race.
I've had, perhaps, 'the scoop' of the century regarding that senator.
And I've had the scientific achievement of the century by disproving
Einstein. Recently, I've begun to reveal details concerning my labor-
of-love New Constitution. Such has been inspired to correct our
nation's problems, and in ways that will be most advantageous to the
American People. Incredibly, none of those things, or all three
combined, rises to the threshold of being even "fifteen minutes" of…
news, Because of our corrupt media, America is in big trouble—very big
trouble!
Tim Russert, and his ilk, got or get, personal enjoyment from making
others be uncomfortable, because of pointed questions or comments. A
real gentleman wouldn't do that. There was something in Russet's
'value system' that just wasn't right. That's why I listed him,
first, of those anti-democracy media figures who should face
retribution for their crimes. It has been said that Russert had
enthusiasm. But his enthusiasm was, quite simply, for doing the wrong
things in his job; doing things not in the best interest of the
country; and getting paid a huge salary to do so. Past 'monetary
compensation' won't stand anyone in good stead at the Pearly Gates.
George Carlin, bless his soul, had more vision for how America should
be than any politician in Washington, or any media icon! The man
perceived truths! Very few people can do that so insightfully, for so
long, and with such fervor. His shoes will be very difficult ones to
fill.
The ruinous media keeps right on doing their 24/7 "nothings" that they
pass off as… news. Thinking Americans everywhere should wake up and
realize how hugely biased the media is toward the status quo. If any
of you are craving listening to talk, turn to the public radio and TV
stations. To begin to save the last hope for America: democracy, by
all means, STOP REPLYING TO ANY POLITICAL POLLSTERS! Don't give the
ubiquitous media fools any 'scores' to justify their commenting
regarding politics, or anything else, as in Ballot Bowl or etc.
Politics is NOT a game!
Hopefully, Barack Obama is the last of a long line of political two-
faces. He has never reached a high enough moral plateau to qualify to
be President. He didn't treat Clinton with the respect that she
deserved; and he didn't honor simple principles of democracy regarding
the FL and MI primaries. Those two things, and others, show that
Obama is unprincipled. He likes anything—corrupt or not—that improves
his chances of winning. People who think like that are the exact ones
my New Constitution will send packing. The main 'changes' that the
USA needs are as simple as straightening out the 'quality of the
personnel' that we hire to work for us in Washington, and in our local
and state governments.
Please know: "A New Constitution is the only 'change' that we need!"
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein — (AKA John A. Armistead)
>
On Jan 28, 2:01 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear Folks: The details concerning my "briefs" to Chief Justice John
> G. Roberts, Jr. about the disqualifying aspects of having Barack Obama
> become President, are included in numbers of essays that I wrote
> leading up to the 2008 Election. In looking back at those, most
> continue to be quite apt as we consider how best to save the USA.
> Here is one those, I think, interesting essays:
>
> 9/04/08
>
> MCCAIN STRIKES GOLD IN ALASKA!
>
> If Hockey Moms have as much going for them as Sarah Palin exhibited
> last night at the Republican Convention, by all means, turn this
> country over to them! Wearing lipstick doesn't signify that there is
> less POWER in "the weaker sex", it just differentiates the Hockey Moms
> from the Pit Bulls!
>
> At last week's Democratic Convention, Governor Bill Richardson asked
> the throng, "Are you ready to take back this country?" That question
> seemed to imply that Obama's motive for 'change' is to wrest the
> control of our country from the powers-that-be in Washington, and
> return control to the People. On that one goal Obama and I agree—The
> PEOPLE SHOULD BE IN CONTROL! That said, having Barack Obama be
> elected President would be THE most catastrophic thing to happen to
> this country, 9/11 included…
>
> As was highlighted by Republicans last night, Barack Obama has ZERO
> executive experience. He's running to be President because his
> lifelong inferiority complex—caused by to his being biracial; 'poor';
> and brought up without a father—demands to be compensated. When more
> and more Blacks began identifying with Obama's angry tone of speech,
> even while he was still in his teens, Obama began being hyped by
> Blacks as their future leader. With each public speech that he
> delivered, his ego swelled. Eventually, he deluded himself into
> believing that he's entitled to be President. The country owes him
> such, simply because of his sad childhood.
>
> Obama's undeserved rise to power was bolstered by the deeply corrupt
> Democratic Party. Such was needing a Manchurian Candidate—without the
> independence of the Clintons—who would be the puppet of Howard Dean
> and his band of thieves. Those like Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle and
> Bob Casey endorsed Obama, not because he's exceptional, but because
> he's unexceptional enough to be needing them to help him "run things"
> in Washington. Take away the implied rewards for those endorsing
> Obama, and the endorsements would have been few, indeed.
>
> For the record, my New Constitution requires that any civil employee
> or office holder be fired for publicly endorsing a candidate for
> government office. That stipulation will stop the you-owe-me-one
> obligations, once in office, which have so compromised candidates'
> ability to do their jobs of representing the People.
>
> Screaming Howard Dean, the DNC Chairman, knows that he himself will
> never be President. But that hasn't stopped Dean from lusting to have
> as much behind-the-scenes power in the White House as he can muster.
> Up until Dean "lost it" in 2004, he had been incredibly successful at
> generating ideological and financial support over the Internet.
> Barack Obama has followed Dean's example—perhaps under Dean's tutorage—
> to gain "grass roots" support via the Internet. Very early, 90 plus
> percent of Blacks—who feel that THEY are entitled to be "compensated",
> too—began backing Obama. They did so with their dollars and with
> their relentless neighborhood recruitments of voters, and new
> registrants to vote… for Obama. The latter is a tacit violation of
> principles of democracy.
>
> A Black man who was interviewed in Time Square right after Obama's
> acceptance of his party's nomination, sounded proud as he said, "This
> year I contributed $50.00 to Obama. Obama won't accept contributions
> from special interests." Well, I've got news for you: Blacks ARE a
> special interest! And they are a hugely threatening one to the future
> of the USA!
>
> If Blacks manage to win "the game" of getting Obama elected, there
> will be in-your-face celebrating. Right off the bat, Blacks will be
> expecting to see the last vestiges of racial discrimination end. They
> will be expecting to have their lot in life be improved, yesterday—
> because they are Black—and that is the worst form of racism. There
> will be violence from Blacks when they aren't as empowered by Obama's
> election as they had hoped. And there will be violence from whites if
> Blacks are empowered, inequitably. The Democrats and Obama have
> gotten this country into a lose/lose situation if Obama gets elected.
> The Watts Riots will look like soccer celebrations by comparison.
>
> Sarah Palin is a Breath of Fresh Air (!) in the midst of the dire
> situation that the USA finds itself in. If John McCain, the current
> standard bearer of the Republican Party, becomes President, our broken
> and corrupt "two party" government will be sitting there, unscathed.
> Yes, McCain is a maverick who sticks to his principles. And even
> though Palin is a "barracuda", the US Constitution doesn't grant the
> Executive Office the POWER necessary to implement the changes that
> need to be made in our government.
>
> Sarah Palin is a genuine gold nugget charmer! But it pains my heart
> to have such a HOPEFUL PRESENCE as she be sacrificed against the
> Calcified Wall of Corruption that is our Congress.
>
> However, Sarah Palin need not be sacrificed! To save both McCain and
> her from failure in 'correcting' our government, all that McCain and
> she need to do is to: Publicly acknowledge that it is PRUDENT to let
> the American People vote on my democracy-based New Constitution, in
> November of 2010! By making just that one simple acknowledgment,
> Congress, and the World, will be put on notice that the American
> People are determined to take back control of government. For much
> too long political parties; lobbyists; PACS; the media; and the "great
> traditions" of Congress have locked us into continuing to do the same
> old ineffectual things.
>
> Historically, Republicans have been pro business; anti big government;
> and anti taxes. But as long as we're in debt—and we are, big time,
> because of Bush's wars—taxes can't be lowered much. On a positive
> note: My New Constitution removes the authority of governments—local,
> state and federal—to raise taxes, ANY taxes, without a direct vote of
> the People! And the vote for passage becomes 60%, not 50.0001%.
> Every law, regulation or procedure that is on the books will be
> reviewed and revoted, WITH full citizen input. Never again will this
> country be strapped by laws not supported by a big majority. And
> never again will the bad laws that got passed be allowed to hold the
> People captive, simply because the People are too law abiding.
>
> This week on CNN's 'Larry King Live', Jesse Ventura tells us that he
> wants to be a player in this country's… Revolution. Ventura says that
> he has no intention of voting for a Democrat nor a Republican.
> Charles Barkley, a potential candidate for governor in Alabama, thinks
> that Democrats and Republicans are corrupt. So, he'll run as an
> Independent. And both Obama and McCain are talking about re taking
> control of our (party-dominated) governments.
>
> Because of the above, and individual observations, too, thinking
> Americans, everywhere, should realize: The major changes needed in our
> government will require tearing down and rebuilding from the ground
> up. But the Plans and Specifications to do so are poised and
> polished. People, start DEMANDING to learn more about my New
> Constitution! The media is giving hints that it can't keep its
> collective heads buried-in-the-sand much longer regarding the prospect
> of there being a New Constitution.
>
> One day, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will make a great first woman
> President of the United States of America. To help assure that such a
> goal isn't an impossible one for her, simply realize: "A New
> Constitution is the only 'change' that we need!" Pass it on!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — NoEinstein —
>
> On Jan 26, 5:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The recent 'State of the Union Address' highlights why "saving our
> > government" in its present form is counterproductive. Hundreds of
> > dolled-out men and women in Congress—by their attendance at the address
> > —paid homage to that squatting dictator, Indonesian, socialist-
> > communist Barack Obama. Though the group was supposedly mixed-up
> > (They are "that", too.), people stood on command to have the Anti-
> > Christ, Obama, be greeted like a rock star. He found willing hands to
> > shake along the 'aisle', that was somehow populated by his most doting
> > supporters. From appearances, alone, Obama seemed like an entering
> > hero, rather than THE most corrupt and hurtful-to-America person in
> > the entire history of this country!
>
> > Our should-be-cherished American Flag, in that House Chamber, was
> > desecrated by having Barack Obama stand in front of it—like he does at
> > every public appearance that he makes. The wrong public perception is
> > that elected officials, fraudulent Presidents, and our corrupt
> > government are synonymous with the USA. But nothing could be further
> > from the truth! The USA is "We, the People", NOT they, the
> > controlling government!
>
> > "The federal government shall not be considered to be synonymous with
> > the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor are they
> > dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall be
> > answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens thereof."
>
> > "The American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue.
> > Only when the President or Secretary of State are addressing the
> > nation or appearing before or receiving foreign dignitaries shall
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment