You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.
I saw the posts that Merc submitted here recently, which were never
posted
to the board. Thankfully, Mark didn't post them, (as I was working
and
wasn't managing the board on the day in question) The comments that
you are
referencing toward Cold Water were mild, as to what didn't get
posted. / Keith from Tampa
Now... you see, Keith.... that's "one" of the major problems with
"censorship"... you are asking
"ME"... to take the word of and the opinion or judgment of Mark
(nothing personal, or anyone else) in forming not unly an opinion as
to Merc but also in condioning a "punishment" administered against her
(in "free" Courts, they have the "practice" of requiring "evidence"
questioning it with "opposing experts" and allowing for the "cross-
examination of evidence and witnesses) .... Frankly, I like to know
all the "facts" in any situation and make up my own mind... be it in
"politics" or in other important (or unimportant ) aspects of life and
living.....
nominal9
On Nov 21, 2:44 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nominal,
>
> You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.
>
> I saw the posts that Merc submitted here recently, which were never posted
> to the board. Thankfully, Mark didn't post them, (as I was working and
> wasn't managing the board on the day in question) The comments that you are
> referencing toward Cold Water were mild, as to what didn't get posted.
>
> I too was an active participant of Euwetopia back in the day, (and I am
> still a member over there, I just don't get over there as often anymore).
> What you are referencing is only a small fraction of what took place over
> there. I am not defending all of the Euwetopians, they are like a wolf
> pack when taunted, and they were unmerciful toward Merc, (as well as others
> that cross them)
>
> Merc was far from innocent, and the "retard" comment, frankly, I don't even
> remember that. If that took place, it was only a small fraction of what
> Merc dished out to not only the Euwetopians, but to anyone and everyone.
>
> Again, you just don't know. Merc has you snowed.
>
> Keith
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:37 PM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I believe Merc explained that she mistook Cold Water to be another
> > poster (using a fictitious screen name) with whm Merc has a history on
> > the topic of Children and abusive names being applied to some of
> > them.... Merc particularly takes umbrage at people who use the term
> > "retard" to refer to some children.....I am telling you this as a
> > point of information....The "folks" on that other (ABC) Political
> > Forum Board apparently gave Merc quite an abusive and tough time with
> > the "retard" bit... ( I wasn't there but so I've heard). Personally, I
> > don't get that insulted about the term "retard" if it is used in a
> > non- abusive manner and I would not condone censoring it in any case,
> > even if it were....
> > But, I think that Merc made a genuine mistake in "wrongly identifying
> > Cold Water" she acknowledged it and made her apology, on board.... as
> > a practical matter, I say that, at this point you do not have a leg to
> > stand on and that you are apparently maliciously banning Merc egged on
> > by those same actual (ABC Political Scrotum Boards) child abusers who
> > are the actual culprits....
> > Anyway, that is the situation....That " is what it is".... you don't
> > seem able either to recognize it or to amend your own error.... and
> > Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame is looming nearer by the
> > moment.....
>
> > On Nov 21, 2:18 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Nominal9,
>
> > > The only person to bring Mercs kid into the conversation was Merc, the
> > only
> > > person to levy a threat against another persons child was Merc, the only
> > > person to victimize Merc was Merc herself.
>
> > > This is a political forum.... just what do you think her kids "condition"
> > > has to do with politics unless she had been using her experiences to talk
> > > about or relate personally under the health care laws which she did not
> > do.
>
> > > She was using that child as a crutch to garner some level of sympathy...
> > > (between shit and syphilis in dictionary).
>
> > > Again, I do not care who did it !!!!!! No one is "special". To bring any
> > > child into this forum in any negative light is ABSOLUTELY NOT GOING TO
> > > HAPPEN.
>
> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > Mark M. Kahle H. , you evaded the point... you are further victimizing
> > > > Merc, a person who has been subjected to the conduct that you yourself
> > > > seem to condemn....
> > > > "Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
> > > > someones
> > > > elses kid were also ill is wrong."
> > > > Answer the direct question and please don't double-talk....Stop
> > > > grandstanding, or behaving like a sententious, dictatorial NAZI ...
> > > > The Hell Pits of Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame are looming
> > > > near....
> > > > Nominal9
>
> > > > PS... Listen to Ewe who goes BAAAAHHHH... and you are more than Half-
> > > > Way there.... you too, can join the likes of the Cecotrophic Rabbit,
> > > > the Pusillanimous Pellet... or Cosmo Cornuto Magcrest, and their
> > > > Board... Euwe-topia... since renamed... Cornuto-pia.
>
> > > > Hypocrites.... one and all....
>
> > > > On Nov 19, 12:40 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > We have decided and it is rather simple:
>
> > > > > Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
> > someones
> > > > > elses kid were also ill is wrong.
>
> > > > > KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, NO SECOND CHANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > > > > Nominal9 if you can't live with that, I am sorry.
>
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > > > > > bring
> > > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the
> > same
> > > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my
> > country.
> > > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > > > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One
>
> > > > > > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
> > > > > > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
> > > > > > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that
> > > > > > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
> > > > > > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
> > > > > > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
> > > > > > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
> > > > > > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the
> > victim,
> > > > > > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very
> > ignorant
> > > > > > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
> > > > > > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
> > > > > > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
> > > > > > "children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed
> > the
> > > > > > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it,
> > Merc
> > > > > > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is
> > a
> > > > > > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge
> > or
> > > > > > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> > > > > > others here abouts....
> > > > > > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
> > > > > > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is
> > living
> > > > > > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
> > > > > > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among
> > "half-
> > > > > > way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful
> > > > > > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the
> > crap
> > > > > > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the
> > crap
> > > > > > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
> > > > > > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
> > > > > > "banning".....
> > > > > > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....
>
> > > > > > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > Nominal9,
>
> > > > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > > > bring
> > > > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the
> > same
> > > > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > > > will
> > > > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my
> > country.
> > > > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > > > > There are NO second chances.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Annointed One, Keith from Tampa...
> > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > > > > > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the
> > low,
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass
> > stupid,
> > > > as
> > > > > > > > well..... have to be, to think censorship is any sort of
> > > > answer....
> > > > > > > > Always room in the Hell Pits.... head up the ass with shit for
> > > > > > > > brains... for eternity....
> > > > > > > > nominal9
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/493434e.
> > > > > > ..
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/f0e0237.
> > > > > > ..
> > > > > > > > Sadly, I must enter the Owner "sysop" Rabbit... the
> > Pusillanimous
> > > > > > > > Pellet..... into my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame, along
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > Message Board.... 72....
>
> > > > > > > > The Pusillanimous Pellet censored and apparently "banned" at
> > least
> > > > > > > > two
> > > > > > > > posters from 72....les and merc.
> > > > > > > > Granted that les and merc can be irritating, still
> > .....whatever
> > > > > > > > offense they may have ostensibly given amounts to naught in
> > > > > > > > comparison
> > > > > > > > to the general level of offense prevalent on the 72 board and
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > offense that they, themselves, received.Rather, it seems that
> > les
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > merc were subject to the usual "cabal" of social castigation
> > > > > > > > irrespective of politics, ideology or affiliation that seems to
> > run
> > > > > > > > rampant among censors and sysops..... which is to say...
> > censorship
> > > > > > > > for the sake of dominance, sadism and control....
>
> > > > > > > > I have given Rabbit, the Pusillanimous
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment