Monday, September 13, 2010

Re: Well, they passed it so they could find out what was in it - now they wish they hadn't

Wasn't there supposed to be "transparency" and all bills were going to be available to the public to read for several days before the politicians voted? 



From: dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net>
To: big2wheelrxx@gmail.com; MERLE MCKINZIE <merlemckinzie@msn.com>; claguerra245@aol.com; calrose123@aol.com; Michael Kerwin <east90thst@yahoo.com>; rn326@aol.com; gocinatlanta@bellsouth.net; jim@parkwayreststop.com; jimxc1@gmail.com; johnbethd@yahoo.com; beckymason@cableone.net; boudicah@hotmail.com; biz@bizzyblog.com; annalthouse@gmail.com; politicalforum@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, September 12, 2010 7:57:27 PM
Subject: Well, they passed it so they could find out what was in it - now they wish they hadn't

    Kinda makes you wonder what other things are gonna show up to tell us how bad this POS legislation was in the first place and how the congressmen and senators should have spent more time reading what was in it before they voted.  This is yet another indication of how badly we are being served by our congressmen and senators and how strongly we should press to vote them out of office.  If they cannot even be trusted to do the job of at least reading something before voting on it and letting the public know in advance what is there, then why should we return them to office at all.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/health/policy/12health.html?th&emc=th

-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment