Thursday, December 15, 2011

HAMAS CAIR Seeks Mtg, $s From Lowe's, Holds Off on Boycott; Lowe's Gave $s to Muslim, Anti-Israel Causes?

December 14, 2011, - 2:22 pm

HAMAS CAIR Seeks Mtg, $s From Lowe's, Holds Off on Boycott; Lowe's Gave $s to Muslim, Anti-Israel Causes?

I warned you. After the uproar over Lowe's pulling its ads from propaganda show, "All-American Muslim," I told you it might not take long until Lowe's capitulated to HAMAS CAIR (the feds said in documents that CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in fundraising for HAMAS terrorist activities). On Sunday Night, HAMAS CAIR Michigan's director, Dawud Walid a/k/a criminal Delano Anthony Willis, Jr., is holding off on the boycott he threatened on Sunday. After Walid/Willis, Jr. saw that Lowe's wasn't backing down from its decision to stop advertising on the show, he lied to the media and claimed he never called for one (when, in fact, he did all over the Detroit airwaves). Now, he and HAMAS CAIR are asking Lowe's for a meeting.

This is usually how it all starts. The meeting happens, with HAMAS CAIR shaking down the business for thousands of dollars and getting the business to agree to diversity training, which is often done by Suehaila Amen, the Hezbollah- and HAMAS-supporting star of "All-American Muslim." If Lowe's meets with Walid/Willis, Jr. and HAMAS CAIR, you know it's all over.

Also, here's another tip: when you shopped at Lowe's, your money was might have been going to extremist Islamic organizations that help Muslim illegal aliens and support HAMAS and Hezbollah. Does Lowe's give money to ACCESS, the Muslim-dominated Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services, which was raided by the FBI for helping pregnant Muslim aliens commit billions of dollars in Medicaid fraud and get birthright citizenship for their babies? ACCESS, as I've told you over the years, also aids Muslim illegal aliens to come and stay here on U.S. soil and get entitlements. The organization also lobbied against putting Hezbollah and HAMAS on the State Department terrorist list because it wanted American Muslims to be able to continue to fund those terrorist groups. ACCESS sponsored the University of Michigan Divestment (from Israel) Conference at which "Annihilate the Jews!" was shouted in unison by conference participants. And ACCESS founded and runs the Arab American National Museum, which features many anti-Israel exhibits. ACCESS announced today that it will stop accepting money from Lowe's, but if, in fact, Lowe's donated to ACCESS, you have to ask why the heck Lowe's was giving them money in the first place. Ditto for the National Network for Arab American Communities, a Muslim-dominated political activist group that helps illegal aliens and organizations that openly support Hezbollah and HAMAS.

Both organizations say they will stop accepting donations from Lowe's. But did they ever get any in the first place? A search of Lowe's foundation's 2010 tax forms–the latest on file and publicly available–revealed no specific contributions to either organization. However, some local Lowe's stores, as the forms note, donate free goods and services to some organizations, none of which is detailed on the forms. Are your home improvement dollars going to these anti-Israel, pan-terrorist causes? I put in a call to Lowe's to find out. I'll let you know if I hear anything in response.

More:

Muslim activists and community leaders have sent Lowe's corporate officials a letter requesting a meeting regarding the decision by the home improvement chain to yank its ads from the Dearborn-based "All-American Muslim" reality show.

The show, which airs at 10 p.m. Sunday on the TLC cable network, follows the lives of five Muslim families in Dearborn.

"We sent a letter requesting a meeting between community leaders of various organizations including (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) to try to come to a resolution regarding the issue," said Dawud Walid, the executive director of CAIR-Michigan Tuesday.

Walid said Tuesday no boycott against Lowe's has been called. . . .

Lowe's officials have apologized for the move but have not said it would reconsider its actions and reinstate its advertising.

Meanwhile on Tuesday, the leaders of the social-services organization ACCESS and the National Network for Arab American Communities (NNAAC) Tuesday announced said their groups will no longer accept donations from Lowe's.

Again, IF Lowe's did give to these organizations, why the heck was Lowe's donating to groups that openly support Islamic terrorist groups and aid illegal aliens, in the first place?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Cowboys herding cats

And thank you for the squirrels. Loved it. Travis

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Bear Bear <thatbearguy@gmail.com> wrote:

thanks Travis.

One of my all time favourite commercials.

Here is another one from EDS. I don't think they aired this one much. I don't know why. I like it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z2_kKAe9y0&feature=related

Bear

On 15 December 2011 10:20, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8&feature=related

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Cowboys herding cats

thanks Travis.

One of my all time favourite commercials.

Here is another one from EDS. I don't think they aired this one much. I don't know why. I like it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z2_kKAe9y0&feature=related

Bear

On 15 December 2011 10:20, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8&feature=related

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Barak Obama Caganer

http://www.caganer.com/barak-obama-p-289.html?language=en

Re: Banning Sharia Law in US is offensive to Muslims

House Bill 2029 *would ban Pennsylvania courts from considering any
foreign
legal code or system that isn't identical with the
Constitution<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution>

>>>I don't care if another country's law IS identical. If ya like that legal code or system better, go there.

*. Muslim activists say that it is specifically targeted against the
practice of Sharia Law--a religious code for Muslims that has the
power of
law in some countries.

>>> Not this one! Duh! What a waste of time

On Dec 15, 10:23 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great. "Offending Muslims" is almost as good a hobby as "Cussin'
> Politicians".
>
> **
> New post on *Fellowship of the Minds*
> <http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/author/dcgere/> Banning Sharia Law
> in US is offensive to
> Muslims<http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/banning-sharia-law-...>by
> DCG <http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/author/dcgere/>
>
> Opponents in Philadelphia say bill on Sharia law unfair to Muslims
>
> Newsworks <http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/item/31320>: A bill in
> Harrisburg that opponents say is targeted against Muslims has followers of
> that faith upset.
>
> House Bill 2029 *would ban Pennsylvania courts from considering any foreign
> legal code or system that isn't identical with the
> Constitution<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution>
> *. Muslim activists say that it is specifically targeted against the
> practice of Sharia Law--a religious code for Muslims that has the power of
> law in some countries. Council on American-Islamic Relations
> (CAIR<http://www.cair.com/>)
> Attorney Amara Chaudhry says *this would block freedom of religious
> expression*.
>
> "This is not a new faith we are not a foreign faith and yes this dangerous,
> clearly stated discriminatory purpose on a publicly circulated document,
> you just don't get any more troubling than that," said Chaudhry.
>
> *Professor Khalid Blankinship of Temple University
> <http://www.temple.edu/>compares
> following Sharia to the Catholic teaching that divorce is not allowed. *"That
> would be like going into the Catholic Church and telling them that you
> can't marry people the way you want or saying you have to allow divorce of
> people even if the Pope ruled otherwise," said Blankinship.
>
> State Representative Rosemarie Swanger of Lebanon County, who authored the
> bill, says *it is designed to preserve rights of liberty that do not exist
> in some foreign legal systems. She has said recognizing foreign laws could
> allow women to be treated as second-class citizens.* In a letter she sent
> to colleagues, Swanger called Sharia law "inherently hostile to our
> constitutional liberties."
>
> I'm no legal scholar but I'm pretty sure that the US Constitution is the
> supreme law of this country. And I'm pretty sure that "freedom of
> religious expression" doesn't include
> <http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/islam/>stoning of women, child
> rape, and honor killings - at least not here in the US (yet).
>
> No doubt CAIR is on a mission. If the politicians cave to this PC baloney
> under the guise of "religion" in Pennsylvania, don't be surprised if CAIR
> challenges this type of legislation in every other state. You know they
> will.
>
> DCG
> *DCG <http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/author/dcgere/>* | December
> 15, 2011 at 6:11 am | Tags: Sharia
> law<http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/?tag=sharia-law>|
> Categories: Culture
> War <http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/?cat=20812>,
> Islam<http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/?cat=420>,
> Religion <http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/?cat=4983159> | URL:http://wp.me/pKuKY-bcT
>
> Comment<http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/banning-sharia-law-...>
> See all comments<http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/banning-sharia-law-...>
>
> Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage
> Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=49883164090367a8ae3126d288a16eee&...>.
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/banning-sharia-law-...
> Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Banning Sharia Law in US is offensive to Muslims

Great. "Offending Muslims" is almost as good a hobby as "Cussin' Politicians".

New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Banning Sharia Law in US is offensive to Muslims

by DCG

Opponents in Philadelphia say bill on Sharia law unfair to Muslims

Newsworks: A bill in Harrisburg that opponents say is targeted against Muslims has followers of that faith upset.

House Bill 2029 would ban Pennsylvania courts from considering any foreign legal code or system that isn't identical with the Constitution. Muslim activists say that it is specifically targeted against the practice of Sharia Law--a religious code for Muslims that has the power of law in some countries. Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Attorney Amara Chaudhry says this would block freedom of religious expression.

"This is not a new faith we are not a foreign faith and yes this dangerous, clearly stated discriminatory purpose on a publicly circulated document, you just don't get any more troubling than that," said Chaudhry.

Professor Khalid Blankinship of Temple University compares following Sharia to the Catholic teaching that divorce is not allowed. "That would be like going into the Catholic Church and telling them that you can't marry people the way you want or saying you have to allow divorce of people even if the Pope ruled otherwise," said Blankinship.

State Representative Rosemarie Swanger of Lebanon County, who authored the bill, says it is designed to preserve rights of liberty that do not exist in some foreign legal systems. She has said recognizing foreign laws could allow women to be treated as second-class citizens. In a letter she sent to colleagues, Swanger called Sharia law "inherently hostile to our constitutional liberties."

I'm no legal scholar but I'm pretty sure that the US Constitution is the supreme law of this country. And I'm pretty sure that "freedom of religious expression" doesn't include stoning of women, child rape, and honor killings - at least not here in the US (yet).

No doubt CAIR is on a mission. If the politicians cave to this PC baloney under the guise of "religion" in Pennsylvania, don't be surprised if CAIR challenges this type of legislation in every other state. You know they will.

DCG

DCG | December 15, 2011 at 6:11 am | Tags: Sharia law | Categories: Culture War, Islam, Religion | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-bcT

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/banning-sharia-law-in-us-is-offensive-to-muslims/

Thanks for flying with

WordPress.com

Cowboys herding cats

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8&feature=related

Dem Congressman Calls Obama: “Arrogant and Alienating Professor Obama”

New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Dem Congressman Calls Obama: "Arrogant and Alienating Professor Obama"

by Scotty Starnes

Is a Democrat pointing out the fact Obama suck also RACIST?

Rep. Dennis Cardoza writes, via The Hill:

After observing President Obama for the last three years, it has become obvious to me that the president might prefer to be a university professor rather than do the job he holds today. While he might not realize that he feels this way, the evidence is very clear to those who work with or watch him closely. Let me be clear — I'm not trying to disparage professors. But anyone who wonders why the president is not crushing the weak Republican field only needs to examine how President Obama has behaved more like Professor Obama:

'IDEA DISEASE'

In the president's first year in office, his administration suffered from what I call "idea disease." Every week, and sometimes almost every day, the administration rolled out a new program for the country. There was no obvious prioritization and, after the rollout, very little effort to actually pass the latest idea/imperative/plan/edict. Instead, the new programs just kept coming, with the new proposals constantly stepping on the previous day's message. This rampant "idea disease" squandered the tremendous goodwill generated by the Obama campaign's message of "hope," tainting the president's personal appeal. As Democrats in Congress, we often felt like we were drinking water out of a fire hose, trying to simultaneously deal with past failures of the Bush administration and the avalanche of new initiatives from Obama. This lack of focus also made it easy for congressional Republicans to stall and foil many of President Obama's best initiatives — which they did with relish!

'I'M RIGHT, YOU'RE WRONG'

Early in his administration, President/Professor Obama repeatedly referred to "teaching moments." He would admonish staff, members of Congress and the public, in speeches and in private, about what they could learn from him. Rather than the ideological or corrupt "I'm above the law" attitudes of some past administrations, President Obama projected an arrogant "I'm right, you're wrong" demeanor that alienated many potential allies. Furthermore, the president concentrated power within the White House, leaving Cabinet members with no other option but to dutifully carry out policies with which they had limited input in crafting and might very well disagree. From my experience, this was especially true in the environmental, resources, housing and employment areas. Not by coincidence, these areas have also been responsible for much of the president's harshest critiques.

LECTURES vs. LISTENING

One former administration official told me directly that the people in the White House "NEVER TALK TO REAL PEOPLE." Another former Obama staffer confided to me that it was clear to him that the president didn't mind giving speeches (lectures), but really avoided personal contact with members of Congress and folks outside the Beltway. "He doesn't seem to derive energy from spending time with regular people the way Clinton did. He rallies to give speeches for the big crowds, but avoids individual contact," the former staffer recalled. This "arms-length" attitude extends to top decision-makers in the president's administration. A senior housing official recently told me that, despite the fact that he was responsible for crafting policies to stem the foreclosure crisis, he had personally never met with a homeowner who had been foreclosed on.

Scotty Starnes | December 14, 2011 at 11:22 AM | Tags: alienating, arrogant Obama, President Obama, Professor Obama, Rep. Dennis Cardoza | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-6fV

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/dem-congressman-calls-obama-arrogant-and-alienating-professor-obama/

Thanks for flying with

WordPress.com

Re: more hypocrisy

Paul's advertisements in Iowa are deceiving, filled with
misinformation,
and prefabricated
----
cite proof

On Dec 14, 2:07 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Paul's advertisements in Iowa are deceiving, filled with misinformation,
> and prefabricated. I thought higher of this man. Paul is a buffoon, and
> hopefully, he will bow out after New Hampshire.
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Because four or five "Troops" support Ron Paul does not make for a
> > statement that the military supports Ron Paul. Common sense dictates
> > otherwise.
>
> > If Ron Paul runs as a third party candidate, thereby guaranteeing another
> > four years of socialistic/communistic rule in America, and most likely the
> > downfall of our Nation, there will be Americans who rue the day.
> > Clearly Paul cannot win the Republican Nomination, and it is time that all
> > conservatives start rallying around the one individual who can make a
> > difference in this Nation.
>
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ad
> >> ----
> >> the truth hurts, eh?
> >> the troops support RP ... choose sides carefully
>
> >> Gingrich has said that he intends on
> >> running a positive campaign
> >> ---
> >> Former New York Rep. Susan Molinari, a Romney supporter who served
> >> alongside Gingrich in the House, said Gingrich's rhetorical games were
> >> entirely familiar from a politician long known as a savage partisan
> >> competitor.
> >> "This is Newt thinking he's smarter than everybody else, which is
> >> always when life catches up with Newt," Molinari said of Gingrich's
> >> two-track messaging.
>
> >> to besmirch his
> >> conservative record
> >> ---
> >> easy to do ... he's a neocon's neocon, ready to send our troops to
> >> kill and die for their agenda
>
> >> it you really love America you will vote for the man who will end the
> >> intervention in other nation's affairs ... it's needless and
> >> destructive to our nation and troops
>
> >> On Dec 14, 9:03 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ads running in Iowa. How
> >> shameful,
> >> > and so designed to split the conservative vote. My respect for Paul
> >> wanes
> >> > each and every day.
>
> >> > There's nothing hypocritical here. Gingrich has said that he intends on
> >> > running a positive campaign, and to date, he has done so.
>
> >> > The "Inside the Beltway/Blue Blood" sect of the Republican Party hates
> >> > Gingrich and have done everything that they can do to besmirch his
> >> > conservative record. It's laughable, and thankfully, at least today,
> >> > Gingrich has a teflon coating.
>
> >> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, plainolamerican
> >> > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> > >http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/12/newt-.
> >> ..
>
> >> > > it's ok for Newt to demonize muslims but not ok for one of his
> >> > > employees to disparage a mormon
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: more hypocrisy

it is time that all
conservatives start rallying around the one individual who can make a
difference in this Nation.
---
the difference he will make is more imperialistic warmongering around
the planet for his fellow zionist neocons

which will lead to more anti-US terrorism

choose sides carefully

On Dec 14, 2:06 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Because four or five "Troops" support Ron Paul does not make for a
> statement that the military supports Ron Paul. Common sense dictates
> otherwise.
>
> If Ron Paul runs as a third party candidate, thereby guaranteeing another
> four years of socialistic/communistic rule in America, and most likely the
> downfall of our Nation, there will be Americans who rue the day.
> Clearly Paul cannot win the Republican Nomination, and it is time that all
> conservatives start rallying around the one individual who can make a
> difference in this Nation.
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ad
> > ----
> > the truth hurts, eh?
> > the troops support RP ... choose sides carefully
>
> > Gingrich has said that he intends on
> > running a positive campaign
> > ---
> > Former New York Rep. Susan Molinari, a Romney supporter who served
> > alongside Gingrich in the House, said Gingrich's rhetorical games were
> > entirely familiar from a politician long known as a savage partisan
> > competitor.
> > "This is Newt thinking he's smarter than everybody else, which is
> > always when life catches up with Newt," Molinari said of Gingrich's
> > two-track messaging.
>
> > to besmirch his
> > conservative record
> > ---
> > easy to do ... he's a neocon's neocon, ready to send our troops to
> > kill and die for their agenda
>
> > it you really love America you will vote for the man who will end the
> > intervention in other nation's affairs ... it's needless and
> > destructive to our nation and troops
>
> > On Dec 14, 9:03 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ads running in Iowa. How shameful,
> > > and so designed to split the conservative vote. My respect for Paul
> > wanes
> > > each and every day.
>
> > > There's nothing hypocritical here. Gingrich has said that he intends on
> > > running a positive campaign, and to date, he has done so.
>
> > > The "Inside the Beltway/Blue Blood" sect of the Republican Party hates
> > > Gingrich and have done everything that they can do to besmirch his
> > > conservative record. It's laughable, and thankfully, at least today,
> > > Gingrich has a teflon coating.
>
> > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, plainolamerican
> > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > >http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/12/newt-.
> > ..
>
> > > > it's ok for Newt to demonize muslims but not ok for one of his
> > > > employees to disparage a mormon
>
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Apache Clips - VID OF THE MONTH - FLIR Color Footage Taliban Takedown

http://www.apacheclips.com/media/37066/VID_OF_THE_MONTH_-_FLIR_color_footage_Taliban_Takedown/

State Dept pays off 56-nation Islamic coalition for truce on free speech

New post on Creeping Sharia

State Dept pays off 56-nation Islamic coalition for truce on free speech

by creeping

The State Dept wants Americans to join the: via Islamic Governments | Free Speech | State Department | The Daily Caller. The State Department began a three-day, closed-door meeting Monday to talk about U.S. free speech rules with representatives from numerous Islamic governments that have lobbied for 12 years to end U.S. citizens' ability to [...]

Re: more hypocrisy

Paul's advertisements in Iowa are deceiving, filled with misinformation, and prefabricated. I thought higher of this man. Paul is a buffoon, and hopefully, he will bow out after New Hampshire.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:

Because four or five "Troops" support Ron Paul does not make for a statement that the military supports Ron Paul. Common sense dictates otherwise.

If Ron Paul runs as a third party candidate, thereby guaranteeing another four years of socialistic/communistic rule in America, and most likely the downfall of our Nation, there will be Americans who rue the day. Clearly Paul cannot win the Republican Nomination, and it is time that all conservatives start rallying around the one individual who can make a difference in this Nation.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:

What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ad

----
the truth hurts, eh?
the troops support RP ... choose sides carefully

Gingrich has said that he intends on
running a positive campaign

---
Former New York Rep. Susan Molinari, a Romney supporter who served
alongside Gingrich in the House, said Gingrich's rhetorical games were
entirely familiar from a politician long known as a savage partisan
competitor.
"This is Newt thinking he's smarter than everybody else, which is
always when life catches up with Newt," Molinari said of Gingrich's
two-track messaging.

to besmirch his
conservative record
---
easy to do ... he's a neocon's neocon, ready to send our troops to
kill and die for their agenda

it you really love America you will vote for the man who will end the
intervention in other nation's affairs ... it's needless and
destructive to our nation and troops

On Dec 14, 9:03 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ads running in Iowa. How shameful,
> and so designed to split the conservative vote. My respect for Paul wanes
> each and every day.
>
> There's nothing hypocritical here. Gingrich has said that he intends on
> running a positive campaign, and to date, he has done so.
>
> The "Inside the Beltway/Blue Blood" sect of the Republican Party hates
> Gingrich and have done everything that they can do to besmirch his
> conservative record. It's laughable, and thankfully, at least today,
> Gingrich has a teflon coating.
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, plainolamerican

> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/12/newt-...

>
> > it's ok for Newt to demonize muslims but not ok for one of his
> > employees to disparage a mormon
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/

> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: more hypocrisy

Because four or five "Troops" support Ron Paul does not make for a statement that the military supports Ron Paul. Common sense dictates otherwise.

If Ron Paul runs as a third party candidate, thereby guaranteeing another four years of socialistic/communistic rule in America, and most likely the downfall of our Nation, there will be Americans who rue the day. Clearly Paul cannot win the Republican Nomination, and it is time that all conservatives start rallying around the one individual who can make a difference in this Nation.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:

What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ad

----
the truth hurts, eh?
the troops support RP ... choose sides carefully

Gingrich has said that he intends on
running a positive campaign

---
Former New York Rep. Susan Molinari, a Romney supporter who served
alongside Gingrich in the House, said Gingrich's rhetorical games were
entirely familiar from a politician long known as a savage partisan
competitor.
"This is Newt thinking he's smarter than everybody else, which is
always when life catches up with Newt," Molinari said of Gingrich's
two-track messaging.

to besmirch his
conservative record
---
easy to do ... he's a neocon's neocon, ready to send our troops to
kill and die for their agenda

it you really love America you will vote for the man who will end the
intervention in other nation's affairs ... it's needless and
destructive to our nation and troops

On Dec 14, 9:03 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is hypocritical, is the Ron Paul ads running in Iowa. How shameful,
> and so designed to split the conservative vote. My respect for Paul wanes
> each and every day.
>
> There's nothing hypocritical here. Gingrich has said that he intends on
> running a positive campaign, and to date, he has done so.
>
> The "Inside the Beltway/Blue Blood" sect of the Republican Party hates
> Gingrich and have done everything that they can do to besmirch his
> conservative record. It's laughable, and thankfully, at least today,
> Gingrich has a teflon coating.
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:49 AM, plainolamerican

> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/12/newt-...

>
> > it's ok for Newt to demonize muslims but not ok for one of his
> > employees to disparage a mormon
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/

> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: 2011.10.28 DETROIT - MODEL FOR THE FUTURE? - NOT!

Your views on isolationism, extremism, and anti-semitism are noted.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:53 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:

there is no socialist-elitist Democrat who is
going to bring prosperity to any community, State, region or on the
federal level

---
agreed

then there's the waste of our nation's wealth and soldiers on other
countries (interventionism) at the hands of the republicans and
democrats

vote for Ron Paul and rebuild America as a powerhouse, without
imperialist warmongering

On Dec 14, 9:57 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The bottom line, is that there is no socialist-elitist Democrat who is
> going to bring prosperity to any community, State, region or on the
> federal level. The socialist-elitist Democrats have not brought any new
> ideas or thoughts to the table in over seventy years. It is a broken down
> simplistic, "Help Your Fellow Man" theory that again, is broken and will
> not work in any Nation, State or community. It has failed miserably, but

> yet socialist Elitist Democrats, (*e.g.;* they are either Moonbats or

> they are Anti-American, one of the two and there is no other explanation
> for anyone being a Democrat anymore) continue to believe that Marxism,
> Maoism, Stalinism, Trotskyism, Communism, et. al, are all really
> wonderful systems of social, economic and political justice, we just
> haven't had the right folks implementing these systems yet.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:50 AM, <drob...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > The corruption and devastation certainly became palpable with Coleman
> > Young, but let's not forget the contribution from Jennifer Granholm and
> > Kwame Kilpatrick.
>

> > ------------------------------
> > *From: *"Keith In Tampa" <keithinta...@gmail.com>
> > *To: *politicalforum@googlegroups.com
> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:42:24 AM
> > *Subject: *Re: 2011.10.28 DETROIT - MODEL FOR THE FUTURE? - NOT!

>
> > Frosty Woolridge hit the nail on the head in this column. Thanks for
> > sharing Travis. I hope everyone takes the time to read the column.
>

> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> ** **

>
> >> A quick check of google, indicates that Detroit has NEVER had a

> >> conservative mayor!****
> >> ------------------------------
>
> >> ** **
>
> >> Don't think this could not happen elsewhere.****
>
> >> ****
>
> >> *DETROIT** - A MODEL FOR THE FUTURE?* ****
>
> >> [image: cid:ECB352C5B1944AEFB58352952FC313C3@ownerPC]
> >> Frosty Wooldridge *(born 1947)* is a US journalist,
> >> writer, environmentalist, traveler.****
>
> >> DETROIT
> >> By Frosty Wooldridge****

>
> >> For 15 years, from the mid 1970's to 1990, I worked in Detroit, Michigan.
> >> I watched it descend into the abyss of crime, debauchery, gun play,
> >> drugs, school truancy, car-jacking, gangs and human depravity. I watched
> >> entire city blocks burned out. I watched graffiti explode on buildings,

> >> cars, trucks, buses and school yards. Trash everywhere!****
>
> >> [image: cid:X.MA2.1312373...@aol.com]****

>
> >> Detroiters walked through it, tossed more into it, and ignored it. Tens
> >> of thousands, and then hundreds of thousands today exist on federal

> >> welfare, free housing, and food stamps!****
>
> >> *With Aid to Dependent Children, minority women birthed 8 to 10 and in

> >> one case, one woman birthed 24 children as reported by the Detroit Free

> >> Press, all on American taxpayer dollars.*****
>
> >> [image: cid:X.MA3.1312373...@aol.com]****

>
> >> A new child meant a new car payment, new TV, and whatever mom wanted. I
> >> saw Lyndon Johnson's 'Great Society' flourish in Detroit . If you give
> >> money for doing nothing, you will get more hands out taking money for doing

> >> nothing.****

>
> >> Mayor Coleman Young, perhaps the most corrupt mayor in America, outside
> >> of Richard Daley in Chicago, rode Detroit down to its knees... He set the
> >> benchmark for cronyism, incompetence, and arrogance. As a black man, he
> >> said, "I am the MFIC." The IC meant "in charge".

> >> [image: cid:X.MA4.1312373...@aol.com]

> >> You can figure out the rest. Detroit became a majority black city with 67

> >> percent African-Americans.****

>
> >> As a United Van Lines truck driver for my summer job from teaching math
> >> and science, I loaded hundreds of American families into my van for a new

> >> life in another city or state.****

>
> >> Detroit plummeted from 1.8 million citizens to 912,000 today. At the
> >> same time, legal and illegal immigrants converged on the city for the
> >> free government hand outs, so much so, that Muslims number over 300,000.
> >> Mexicans number 400,000 throughout Michigan, but most work in Detroit.
> >> As the whites moved out, the Muslims moved in.

> >> [image: cid:X.MA5.1312373...@aol.com]

> >> As the crimes became more violent, the whites fled. Finally, unlawful
> >> Mexicans moved in at a torrid pace. Detroit suffers so much shoplifting
> >> that grocery stores no longer operate in many inner city locations. You
> >> could cut the racial tension in the air with a knife! Detroit may be one of
> >> our best examples of multiculturalism: pure dislike, and total separation

> >> from America.****

>
> >> Today, you hear Muslim calls to worship over the city like a new American
> >> Baghdad with hundreds of Islamic mosques in Michigan, paid for by Saudi
> >> Arabia oil money. High school flunk out rates reached 76 percent last June,
> >> according to NBC's Brian Williams. Classrooms resemble more foreign
> >> countries than America. English? Few speak it! The city features a 50
> >> percent illiteracy rate and growing.

> >> [image: cid:X.MA6.1312373...@aol.com]

> >> Unemployment hit 28.9 percent in 2009 as the auto industry vacated the
> >> city. In Time Magazine's October 4, 2009, "The Tragedy of Detroit: How a
> >> great city fell, and how it can rise again," I choked on the writer's
> >> description of what happened. "If Detroit had been ravaged by a hurricane,
> >> and submerged by a ravenous flood, we'd know a lot more about it,"
> >> Said Daniel Okrent. "If drought and carelessness had spread brush fires
> >> across the city, we'd see it on the evening news every night." Earthquake,
> >> tornadoes, you name it, if natural disaster had devastated the city that
> >> was once the living proof of American prosperity, the rest of the country
> >> might take notice.

> >> [image: cid:X.MA7.1312373...@aol.com]

> >> But Detroit, once our fourth largest city, now 11th and slipping rapidly,

> >> has had no such luck.****

>
> >> Its disaster has long been a slow unwinding that seemed to remove it from
> >> the rest of the country. Even the death rattle that in the past year
> >> emanated from its signature industry brought more attention to the auto
> >> executives than to the people of the city, who had for so long been
> >> victimized by their dreadful decisions making.
>

> >> [image: cid:X.MA8.1312373...@aol.com]

> >> As Coleman Young's corruption brought the city to its knees, no amount of
> >> federal dollars could save the incredible payoffs, kickbacks and illegality
> >> permeating his administration. I witnessed the city's death from the seat
> >> of my 18-wheeler tractor trailer because I moved people out of every sector

> >> of decaying Detroit.****

>
> >> "By any quantifiable standard, the city is on life support. Detroit 's
> >> treasury is $300 million short of the funds needed to provide the barest
> >> municipal services," Okrent said. "The school system, which six years ago
> >> was compelled by the teachers' union to reject a philanthropist's offer of
> >> $200 million to build 15 small, independent charter high schools, is in

> >> receivership.****

>
> >> The murder rate is soaring, and 7 out of 10 remain unsolved. Three years
> >> after Katrina devastated New Orleans , unemployment in that city hit a peak
> >> of 11%. In Detroit today, the unemployment rate is 28.9%. That's worth

> >> spelling out: twenty-eight point nine percent. ****
>
> >> [image: cid:X.MA9.1312373...@aol.com]****

>
> >> At the end of Okrent's report, and he will write a dozen more about
> >> Detroit, he said, "That's because the story of Detroit is not simply one of
> >> a great city's collapse, it's also about the erosion of the industries that
> >> helped build the country we know today. The ultimate fate of Detroit will

> >> reveal much about the character of America in the 21st century. ****

>
> >> If what was once the most prosperous manufacturing city in the nation has
> >> been brought to its knees, what does that say about our recent past? And if
> >> it can't find a way to get up, what does that say about America 's future?

> >> ****
>
> >> [image: cid:X.MA10.1312373...@aol.com]****

>
> >> As you read in my book review of Chris Steiner's book,"$20 Per Gallon",
> >> the auto industry won't come back. Immigration will keep pouring more and
> >> more uneducated third world immigrants from the Middle East into Detroit,
> >> thus creating a beachhead for Islamic hegemony in America. If 50 percent
> >> illiteracy continues, we will see more homegrown terrorists spawned out of
> >> the Muslim ghettos of Detroit. Illiteracy plus Islam equals walking human

> >> bombs. ****
>
> >> [image: cid:X.MA11.1312373...@aol.com]****

>
> >> You have already seen it in Madrid, Spain, London, England, and Paris,
> >> France with train bombings, subway bombings and riots. As their numbers
> >> grow, so will their power to enact their barbaric Sharia Law that negates
> >> republican forms of government, first amendment rights, and subjugates
> >> women to the lowest rungs on the human ladder. We will see more honor
> >> killings by upset husbands, fathers and brothers that demand subjugation by
> >> their daughters, sisters and wives. Muslims prefer beheadings of women to
> >> scare the hell out of any other members of their sect from straying.
> >> Multiculturalism: what a perfect method to kill our language, culture,

> >> country and way of life. ****
>
> >> [image: cid:X.MA12.1312373...@aol.com]****

>
> >> I PRAY EVERYONE WHO READS THIS REALIZES THAT IF WE DON'T STAND UP AND
> >> SCREAM AT WASHINGTON AND OUR STATE, CITY, AND LOCAL LEADERS, THIS IS WHAT

> >> AWAITS THE REST OF AMERICA. ****

>
> >> IF YOU THINK THIS IS JUST A BUNCH OF HOOEY AND YOU FEEL NO DUTY TO FIGHT
> >> FOR THIS COUNTRY, THEN I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT WILL TAKE FOR YOU TO STAND AND

> >> FIGHT! ****
>
> >> [image: cid:X.MA13.1312373...@aol.com]

> >> "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
> >> Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

> >> * ~ ~ Benjamin Franklin* ****

>
> >> LORD HAVE MERCY ON AMERICA

> >> AND SHOW US THE WAY…****
> >> ------------------------------
>
> >> ****
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.