--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Nov 27, 10:25 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Martin Reed
> Date: Sunday,
>
> She'll probably lose this of course (wrong religion) but she'd be more
> certain of losing if she'd been born here (wrong race).
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8917675/Christian-worker-los...
>
> Christian worker loses her job after being 'targeted' by Islamic extremists
>
> A Christian worker has launched a landmark legal action after she lost her
> job when she blew the whistle on what she says was a campaign of "race
> hate" by fundmentalist Muslims.
>
> By Jonathan Wynne-Jones, Religious Affairs Correspondent
>
> 7:30AM GMT 27 Nov 2011
>
> Nohad Halawi, who worked at Heathrow Airport, is suing her former employers
> for unfair dismissal, claiming that she and other Christian staff at the
> airport were victims of systematic harassment because of their religion.
>
> She claims that she was told that she would go to Hell for her religion,
> that Jews were responsible for the September 11th terror attacks, and that
> a friend was reduced to tears having been bullied for wearing a cross.
>
> Mrs Halawi, who came to Britain from Lebanon in 1977, worked in the
> duty-free section as a perfume saleswoman of the airport for 13 years but
> was dismissed in July.
>
> Her case is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, who say it
> raises important legal issues and also questions over whether Muslims and
> Christians are treated differently by employers.
>
> It comes amid growing concern among some Christians that their faith is
> being marginalised and follows calls from Lord Carey, the former Archbishop
> of Canterbury, for Christians to be given greater legal protection in the
> wake of a series of cases where they have been disciplined or dismissed for
> practising their faith.
>
> It also raises further questions over race relations at Heathrow Airport.
>
> Last week, Arieh Zucker, a Jewish businessman, complained that he has been
> repeatedly singled out for full-body scans by Muslim security staff at the
> airport.
>
> The 41-year-old mortgage broker from London has accused them of "race hate"
> and is threatening to sue for racial discrimination after being made to
> "feel like a criminal" while being scanned.
>
> Mrs Halawi's case centres on whether she was treated unfairly when she lost
> her job in World Duty Free in Terminal 3 after she spoke out over what she
> described as bullying and intimidation by her Muslim colleagues of her and
> other Christians.
>
> She said that she was the subject of a complaint by an Islamic colleague
> which was specious and that when she raised her own concerns as a
> Christian, she was the one who was dismissed.
>
> Now she is distraught at losing her job on allegations made by what she
> describes as a small group of "extremist" Muslims.
>
> Mrs Halawi, 47, said: "I have been sacked on the basis of unsubstantiated
> complaints so there is now great fear amongst my former colleagues that the
> same could happen to them if one of the Muslims turns on them.
>
> "This is supposed to be a Christian country, but the law seems to be on the
> side of the Muslims."
>
> A mother of two, she says that she had always got on well with her Muslim
> colleagues and relations between staff of different faiths had been good in
> the past, but that the atmosphere became increasingly uncomfortable with a
> growing number of employees espousing "fundamentalist Islam".
>
> She says they harassed Christians at work by making fun of them for wearing
> crosses, ridiculing Jesus and telling them they would go to Hell if they
> did not convert to Islam.
>
> "One man brought in the Koran to work and insisted I read it and another
> brought in Islamic leaflets and handed them out to other employees," she
> said.
>
> "They said that 9/11 served the Americans right and that they hated the
> West, but that they had come here because they want to convert people to
> Islam.
>
> "They say that Jesus is s***** [shitty] and bullied a Christian friend of
> mine so much for wearing her crosses that she came to me crying."
>
> Mrs Halawi says she was targeted by the fundamentalists after she stood up
> for her friend, who is 62 and who she is keeping anonymous because she
> still works at the terminal.
>
> In May, five of her Muslim colleagues complained to David Tunnicliffe, the
> trading manager at World Duty Free, accusing her of being anti-Islamic
> following a heated conversation in the store.
>
> The row had stemmed from her description of a Muslim colleague as an
> allawhi, which means 'man of God' in Arabic. Another Muslim overheard this
> and thought she said Alawi, which was his branch of Islam.
>
> Following the complaints she was suspended immediately, but was not told
> the grounds for her suspension until she met Mr Tunnicliffe in July.
>
> Two days after the meeting she received a letter, which said the "store
> approval" - the Heathrow security pass - needed to work at World Duty Free
> was being removed because her behaviour was deemed to be unacceptable.
>
> "I believe that the breakdown in relationship between yourself and some of
> your colleagues has contributed to this situation and has led to a number
> of inappropriate conversations taking place," the letter said.
>
> "Whilst I do not believe that you may have meant to be offensive, I believe
> that it was not unreasonable for the individuals who either heard these
> comments, or who they were directed at to find them offensive, and they are
> extremely inappropriate."
>
> However, the only comments she made which Mr Tunnicliffe claimed were
> offensive relate to her accusing a Muslim colleague of having "extremist
> leaflets" and asking another Muslim why Jesus was being described as
> "s*****".
>
> She was paid on a freelance basis by Caroline South Associates, a fragrance
> and cosmetics agency that provides staff to work in World Duty Free, and
> was told that she would not be able to continue working without her pass.
>
> A petition signed by 28 colleagues, some of them Muslims, argued that she
> has been dismissed on the basis of "malicious lies", but failed to see her
> reinstated.
>
> Andrea Minichiello Williams, founder and director of the Christian Legal
> Centre, said that the case is one of the most serious they have handled.
>
> "It raises huge issues," she said.
>
> "First, there is the level of Islamic fundamentalism prevalent at our main
> point of entry to the UK.
>
> "Then there are very real issues of religious discrimination, which it
> would appear those in authority are turning a blind eye to, using the
> current loop-holes in employment law as an excuse."
>
> The centre has instructed Paul Diamond, a leading human rights barrister,
> to represent Mrs Halawi in taking both Caroline South Associates and
> Autogrill Retail UK Limited, which trades as World Duty Free, to an
> employment tribunal.
>
> They hope that the case will set a precedent for thousands of people like
> Mrs Halaoui who would appear to be employees from the working relationship,
> but actually have no rights because of their self-employed status.
>
> A lawyer acting for CSA said: "The case is still pending so the company is
> not in a position to comment, but as far as the company is concerned she's
> never been an employee and has never been dismissed."
>
> A spokesman for World Duty Free said they were unable to comment because
> the matter is subject to "ongoing legal proceedings".
>
> __._,_.___
> Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
> Messages in this topic (1)
> Recent Activity:
>
> New Members 1
>
> Visit Your Group
> Subscribe: libertarian-alliance-forum-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: libertarian-alliance-forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
>
> NB - The Libertarian Alliance does not necessarily approve of the above
> message.
> MARKETPLACE
>
> Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get
> the Yahoo! Toolbar now.
>
> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
> .
> __,_._,___
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Nov 26, 10:01 am, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No matter how you slice it MJ, only a small minority agree with
> Ron Paul, the greater majority don't. Though his views may resound for
> some like you they are not in sync with the reality of the world as it
> is today. Ron Paul has no chance of ever being nominated.
>
> On Nov 25, 4:47 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > ""I've spent years studying this stuff," he adds, and one could well believe he had indeed spent years learning how to start out with a libertarian premise –"It's desperately important that we preserve your right to be innocent until proven guilty"– and coming out the other end with a purely authoritarian conclusion. This, as I've pointed out in the past, isBizarro Conservatism– a doctrine that preaches the preciseoppositeof what the traditional "less government," pro-individual rights conservativesused tobelieve."Showdown at Neocon CentralNewt Gingrich vs. Ron PaulbyJustin Raimondo, November 25, 2011
> > The Republican "national security"debatesponsored byNeocon CentraltheAmerican Enterprise Instituteand theHeritage Foundationcaptured perfectly the intellectual and political bankruptcy of the Republican party when it comes to foreign policy. Here the party's panderingdemagoguery, reflexiveultra-nationalism, and visceralhostility to libertywas on full display in all its exhibitionistic belligerence. It was only natural, therefore, that the first question was asked by disgraced former US Attorney GeneralEdwin Meese, who was forced to resign as Reagan's AG as a result of his complicity in obtaining big defense contracts for a phony "minority"-owned company. Here is his "question":"At least 42 terrorist attacks aimed at the United States have been thwarted since 9/11. Tools like the Patriot Act have been instrumental in finding and stopping terrorists. Shouldn't we have a long range extension of the investigative powers contained in that act so that our law enforcement officers can have the tools that they need?"What a set up forNewt Gingrich! And he certainly took advantage of it: naturally he was given the first answer –with poor Herman Cain having outlived his usefulness and been unceremoniouslydumped, Newt is the "mainstream" media'snew darling. That's because he can always be counted on to reiterate the neocons' favorite talking points, and on this occasion he did not disappoint:"BLITZER: Speaker Gingrich, only this weekend there was an alleged terror plot uncovered in New York City. What do you think?
> > "GINGRICH: Well, I think that Attorney General Meese has raised a key point, and the key distinction for the American people to recognize is the difference between national security requirements and criminal law requirements.
> > "I think it's desperately important that we preserve your right to be innocent until proven guilty, if it's a matter of criminal law. But if you're trying to find somebody who may have a nuclear weapon that they are trying to bring into an American city, I think you want to use every tool that you can possibly use to gather the intelligence.
> > "The Patriot Act has clearly been a key part of that. And I think looking at it carefully and extending it and building an honest understanding that all of us will be in danger for the rest of our lives. This is not going to end in the short run. And we need to be prepared to protect ourselves from those who, if they could, would not just kill us individually, but would take out entire cities."In less than 200 words, Newt managed the wholesale bifurcation of American law into two parallel tracks, one that acknowledges how "desperately important" it is to "preserve your right to be innocent until proven guilty," and the other which recognizes no such necessity – and, in fact, negates it.
> > Oh, isn't he glib – isn't heclever? With a mere sleight of hand he has obviatedtheConstitutionand upended the legal and moral traditions of two hundred years. What an achievement! He smiles agreasy, easy grin,well-pleased with himself. The audience dutifully applauds.
> > "I've spent years studying this stuff," he adds, and one could well believe he had indeed spent years learning how to start out with a libertarian premise –"It's desperately important that we preserve your right to be innocent until proven guilty"– and coming out the other end with a purely authoritarian conclusion. This, as I've pointed out in the past, isBizarro Conservatism– a doctrine that preaches the preciseoppositeof what the traditional "less government," pro-individual rights conservativesused tobelieve.
> > Newt'sclash with Ron Paulover this issue defined the parameters of the subsequent hour or so: this was the firstPaul-centricdebate, preceded by hisrise in the pollsand his increasingly important role as theideologicalcatalystof this GOP presidential primary. Once again, as in the economic sphere – with even former Federal Reserve board memberHerman CainechoingPaul's callto audit the Fed – the Texas congressman set the tone of the discussion with his ringing defense of the Founders' concept of what freedom means:"I think the Patriot Act is unpatriotic because it undermines our liberty. I'm concerned, as everybody is, about the terrorist attack. Timothy McVeigh was a vicious terrorist. He was arrested. Terrorism is still on the books, internationally and nationally, it's a crime and we should deal with it.
> > "We dealt with it rather well with Timothy McVeigh. But why I really fear it is we have drifted into a condition that we were warned against because our early founders were very clear. They said, don't be willing to sacrifice liberty for security.
> > "Today it seems too easy that our government and our congresses are so willing to give up our liberties for our security. I have a personal belief that you never have to give up liberty for security. You can still provide security without sacrificing our Bill of Rights."Newt thought he'd won by making a dramatic pause and intoning:
> > "Yes. Timothy McVeigh succeeded. That's the whole point."Looking like a Halloween pumpkin left out in the rain, Gingrich went into novelist mode,scaring the childrenwith the specter of "losing a major American city" and bringing his fist down hard on the podium as he thundered"I want a law that says, you try to take out an American city, we're going to stop you!"Paul's answer wasperfect:"This is like saying that we need a policeman in every house, a camera in every house because we want to prevent child-beating and wife-beating. You can prevent crimes by becoming a police state. So if you advocate the police state, yes, you can have safety and security and you might prevent a crime, but the crime then will be against the American people and against our freedoms. And we will throw out so much of what our revolution was fought for. So don't do it so carelessly."In short: why not just set up a dictatorship and be done with it? Paul is too polite to point out that Newt would make theperfectdictator, strutting about the stage and puffing out his chest like a peacock on parade – so I will.
> > I thought I detected an elegiac note in Paul's remarks, a sadness in his voice as he pleaded with his audience not to throw away the Founders' gift "so carelessly." As if he fears that they probably will, anyway.
> > There is reason for pessimism: we are, after all, living in a time when a half-bakedprofessionalbloviatorlike Gingrich is considered a conservative "intellectual." With the help of the "mainstream" media – which would like nothing more than to see the singularlyunattractiveandbaggage-ladenGingrich up againsttheir heroObama – the Newtster is having his moment in the sun. It will, however, be a brief moment – and he's not really running for president anyway.Everyone knowshis campaign has been a vanity project and moneymaking operation from the outset.
> > Quietlygaining traction, the growth and development of the Paulian movement occurring largelybeneaththe media's radar, the Paul campaign has achieved tremendous gains for the peace movement in America. No matter how it ends, it has created a new chapter in the history of the foreign policy discourse in this country: anti-interventionism is no longer considered the exclusive preserve of the "radical" left. For the first time since the 1930s, the anti-imperialist tendency in American conservatism is in the ascendant: theOld Rightisback, more organized andintellectually coherentthan ever.
> > This is a development the neocons have longfeared, and the viciousattackson Paul coming fromthose quartersare bound to increase in number and intensity as the campaign succeeds in becoming theconservative alternativeto thesupposedly"inevitable" Mitt Romney.
> > Gingrich's job in all this is to act as the "moderator," the Deep Thinker who polices the discussion, always on the lookout for any deviation fromneoconservative orthodoxy. His role-playing is underscored by thepost-debatespeculationover whether he imperiled his rising star by taking a "soft" stand on immigration.
> > It may seem passing strange that someone so concerned about a nuclear bomb being smuggled into a major American city would take such a lax attitude about policing our borders. But that's the Newtster for you: he can think up an argument foranything– even taking$1.6 millionfromFreddie Macwhile at the same timeclaiming to be in favor of abolishing it! I tell you, the man's a genius – and if you don't believe that, then just ask him. After all, he's "spent years studying this stuff."
> > There's nothing new in Newt's stance on immigration: he's been saying the same thingfor years. He said at the debate he's "willing to take the heat" on this issue because the neocons – who see America as a "universal nation," like Rome, Great Britain, and the other great empires of the past – have always been for amnestying so-called illegal aliens. On the other hand, Paul echoes the concerns of the
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
choose sides carefully
On Nov 26, 9:31 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Justin "I'd Like To Teach The World To Sing" Raimondo + M.J. =
>
> crackpot.jpg
> 9KViewDownload
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
For this offer to work, we need make an arrangement regarding the
referees. My original offer was a bit different: either you get 100
dollars or you get a free book or free junk food. In other words, it
was a one-sided offer. I did not need to pay someone's expenses or the
other way around. I had an allocated budget for that and regardless
the judgment of the referees I was going to achieve my goal: start
rational dialogue in an environment where warmonger's confrontational
propaganda of hostility and bloodshed is popular.
So, offer a method to select an impartial referee, then I will take
your proposal, preferrably in Tucson.
Peace,
Edip
> little higher. How about we debate, "*mano-y-mano*", and the loser cover
On Nov 26, 8:22 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good Morning from Tampa Florida Edip,
>
> I have ony watched a portion of your video, and seen only a smidgeon of
> your writings.
>
> I'll take your challenge, albeit I would like for the stakes to be a
> all expenses of the winner?
>
> I am prepared to come to New York, or for you to come to Tampa Florida.
> If you come to Tampa, I can arrange for public broadcasting on cable
> television, but either way, our debate will be broadcast on You-Tube.
>
> Put your money where your mouth is.....
>
> Respectfully,
>
> KeithInTampa
> KeithInTampa@gmail,com
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Democrat <edipyuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Edip Yuksel chellenges fellow Americans at Ground Zero.
>
> >http://www.edip4president.com/challenge/- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Nov 26, 10:21 am, Sage2 <wisdom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The bottom line is quite simple for any argument as it
> relates to Arab , Israeli relations. The Arabs are a culture of hate
> for Jews and never intend to make peace with them. History proves Edip
> Yuksel wrong time & time again. One need only read the 1928 Muslim
> Brotherhood Manifesto. If it had not been for the Western countries
> during WWII fighting for the worlds freedom the Arabs would be slaves
> to the Germans, even with the Brotherhood having assisted them in war
> crimes against the Jews.
>
> On Nov 26, 10:22 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Good Morning from Tampa Florida Edip,
>
> > I have ony watched a portion of your video, and seen only a smidgeon of
> > your writings.
>
> > I'll take your challenge, albeit I would like for the stakes to be a
> > little higher. How about we debate, "*mano-y-mano*", and the loser cover
> > all expenses of the winner?
>
> > I am prepared to come to New York, or for you to come to Tampa Florida.
> > If you come to Tampa, I can arrange for public broadcasting on cable
> > television, but either way, our debate will be broadcast on You-Tube.
>
> > Put your money where your mouth is.....
>
> > Respectfully,
>
> > KeithInTampa
> > KeithInTampa@gmail,com
>
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Democrat <edipyuk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Edip Yuksel chellenges fellow Americans at Ground Zero.
>
> > >http://www.edip4president.com/challenge/-Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
The Federal Reserve Bank is a consortium of 9 banks:
$1. Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin.
$2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris.
$3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy.
$4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam.
$5. Lehman Brothers of NY.
$6. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of NY (Now Shearson American Express).
$7. Goldman, Sachs of NY.
$8. National Bank of Commerce NY/Morgan Guaranty Trust
$9. Hanover Trust of NY (William and David Rockefeller & Chase
National Bank NY are principal shareholders).
The largest shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank are the
Rothschilds of London holding 57% of the stock which is not available
for public trading.
THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
1) Ben Shalom Bernanke: Chairman of the Board of Governors of Federal
Reserve. Term ends 2020.
2) Donald L. Kohn: Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of Federal
Reserve. Term ends 2016.
3) Randall S. Kroszner: Member of Board of Governors of Federal
Reserve.
4) Frederic S. Mishkin: Member of Board of Governors of Federal
Reserve. Term ends 2014.
5) Alan Greenspan: Advisor to Board of Governors of Federal Reserve.
Recent Chairman.
On Nov 27, 7:08 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: coyotep...@rocketmail.com
>
> FYI: Here is a partial list of the Occupy Wall Street backers, also not
> included are a bunch of labor unions (SEIU) here in the United States. A
> lot of the protesters attending these rallies across America do not know
> who they are supporting by attending. They are being used in an effort to
> undermine this country, most are ignorant to this fact.
>
> You could also throw in some others including Frances Fox Piven, Hillary
> Clinton, George Soros, Etc.
>
> The 99%: Official list of Occupy Wall Street's supporters, sponsors and
> sympathizers
>
> Communist Party USA
>
> Communist Party USA, OWS speech, The Daily Caller
>
> American Nazi Party
>
> Media Matters, American Nazi Party, White Honor, Sunshine State News
>
> Ayatollah Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran
>
> The Guardian, Tehran Times, CBS News
>
> Barack Obama
>
> ABC News, CBS News, ForexTV, NBC New York
>
> The government of North Korea
>
> Korean Central News Agency (North Korean state-controlled news outlet), The
> Marxist-Leninist, Wall Street Journal, Times of India
>
> Louis Farrakhan, Nation of Islam
>
> video statement (starting at 8:28), Black in America, Weasel Zippers,
> Philadelphia Weekly
>
> Revolutionary Communist Party
>
> Revolutionary Communist Party, Revolution newspaper, in-person appearance
>
> David Duke
>
> Talking Points Memo, video statement, davidduke.com
>
> Joe Biden
>
> Talking Points Memo, video statement, Mother Jones
>
> Hugo Chavez
>
> Mother Jones, Reuters, Examiner.com
>
> Revolutionary Guards of Iran
>
> Associated Press, FARS News Agency, UPI
>
> Black Panthers (original)
>
> in-person appearance, Occupy Oakland, Oakland Tribune
>
> Socialist Party USA
>
> Socialist Party USA, IndyMedia, The Daily Caller
>
> US Border Guard
>
> White Reference,www.usborderguard.com, Gateway Pundit, Just Another Day
> blog
>
> Industrial Workers of the World
>
> IWW web site, iww.org, in-person appearances
>
> CAIR
>
> in-person appearance, Washington Post, CAIR, CAIR New York
>
> Nancy Pelosi
>
> Talking Points Memo, video statement, ABC News, The Weekly Standard
>
> Communist Party of China
>
> People's Daily (Communist Party organ), Reuters, chinataiwan.org, The
> Telegraph
>
> Hezbollah
>
> almoqawama.org, almoqawama.org (2), almoqawama.org (3), wikipedia
>
> 9/11Truth.org
>
> 911truth.org (1), 911truth.org (2), 911truth.org (3)
>
> International Bolshevik Tendency
>
> bolshevik.org, Wire Magazine
>
> Anonymous
>
> Adbusters, The Guardian, video statement
>
> White Revolution
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Virginia has a history that caused her to become the mother of FF presidents.
That history still shows within the extraordinary beauty of Virginia's constitution and statutes.
Virginia's law is still enables her to save the constitutional republic of the United States if she will first save herself from the custom of cavalier conceits of authority whose toxic culture came to the 'Old Dominion' with refugees from the English Civil War.
Virginia appears to be the only state that has a law equivalent to VA18.2-481(5) where 'Resisting the execution of the laws under the color of its authority' is defined as 'Statutory Treason'.
In 1619 slavery had no lawful basis under the English common law written upon the hearts of its people – Slavery in Virginia started as no more than the cavalier criminal conceit of 'Our law will not protect you – as far as you are concerned I am the law'. That purely criminal evil is still with us and is conclusively evidenced by EVERY officer of our courts – Yet, if confronted and pardoned by our Governor upon the penitent virtue of toothy parole oath that evil can be removed from Virginia's future.
Yes, and even our country's future because every Virginia federal judge is still a member of the Virginia Bar , still an officer of the courts of Virginia, and so deemed by the presumptions of Virginia law to professionally know the law so that they must recognize VA18.2-481(5) felony when it occurs and so are conclusively evidenced as having at LEAST criminally perpetrated felony VA18.2-482 'Misprision of Treason'.
ALL such officers must plead for pardon or eventually be condemned by our law – under God – that requires that ALL felony, and conditions that foster felony, be presented to a grand jury until the felony is properly judged. Our Governor's pardon is the best and only way out of the felony condemnation due every lawyer and judge in Virginia, INCLUDING Virginia's federal judges!
'Constitution Reset' naturally cascading from Virginia can gently and gracefully save our country.
The Question that remains is 'Does Virginia still have the heart to raise leaders ready to face God?'
All prayer warriors, please remember us. May we become fit to serve God & Country as our law requires. 
http://teapartyconstitutionalists.ning.com
http://constitutional-reset.blogspot.com/
--The jewish god of the old testament is arguably the most unpleasant
character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust,
unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser;
a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal,
filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously
malevolent bully. - Richard Dawkins
On Nov 27, 7:00 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: NPR's Most E-Mailed Stories
> Date: Sunday, November 27, 2011
> Subject: Would The World Be Better Off Without Religion?
> To: majors.br...@gmail.com
>
> November 27, 2011 Please donate to your NPR Station
> Intelligence Squared U.S.
> Would The World Be Better Off Without Religion?
> A rabbi, a descendant of Charles Darwin, a philosopher and a scholar face
> off over religion in the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate.
> The Salt
> Eating Canned Soup Makes BPA Levels Soar
> A couple of hours after eating, participants in a Harvard study who
> consumed canned soup had BPA levels in their urine that were about 12 times
> higher than the people who didn't. But the health implications of this sort
> of exposure to the chemical, which can act like the hormone estrogen, are
> still murky.
>
> Support comes from:
>
> Become an NPR sponsor
>
> ________________________________
> A Thanksgiving How-To
> Thanksgiving Secrets: Cook's Tips From Chris Kimball
> A cook's secrets are meant to stay in the kitchen — and many chefs feel
> that their techniques and special ingredients are their own property.
> Luckily, Chris Kimball of America's Test Kitchen is happy to share his
> secrets, as he offers tips to make a great Thanksgiving meal.
> ________________________________
> Krulwich Wonders...
> Are You Totally Improbable Or Totally Inevitable?
> Author and blogger Dr. Ali Binazir did the calculations and decided that
> the chances of anyone existing are one in 10 to the 2,685,000th power. On
> the other hand, there are poets who argue exactly the opposite: that each
> of us is fated to exist, that there is a plan, and that all of us are
> expected.
> ________________________________
> The Two-Way
> VIDEO: After Pepper-Spraying, A Powerfully Silent Protest At UC Davis
> Outraged after seeing campus police use pepper spray on protesters who were
> sitting down, hundreds showed their disdain. They stood by silently as the
> school's chancellor walked to her SUV. The moments are on video.
> ________________________________
> More Most E-mailed
> New Catholic Mass Already Causing A Stir
> Shortage Of ADHD Drugs Has Parents, Doctors Scrambling
> For Thanksgiving, Debunk Your Family's Chain Emails
> 2011's Best Cookbooks: Revenge Of The Kitchen Nerds
> How One Man Played 'Moneyball' With 'Jeopardy!'
> More at NPR.org
>
> NPR's Most Popular Stories
> Diversions
> Books
> Music
> Send Feedback
>
> Get the Most E-mailed Stories Podcast from NPR
> NPR: Most E-Mailed Stories
> Or, get automatic updates via RSS with NPR News Feeds
> This message was sent to majors.br...@gmail.com
> Unsubscribe | Manage Subscriptions | Privacy Policy
> To stop ALL email from NPR Newsletters, click here to remove yourself from
> our lists.
> This email was sent by: NPR, 635 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC
> 20001-3753
> © 2010 NPR
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
it's time to take their credit cards away and make them pay for their
own charities
On Nov 27, 7:06 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Scott
>
> Yes, this is from Sen. Bernie Sanders (Ind-VT), the only politician in
> Washington who says out loud that he's a socialist, and whom I therefore
> admire for his refreshing honesty.
> --S.
>
> http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-6...
>
> The Fed Audit
>
> July 21, 2011
>
> The first top-to-bottom audit of the Federal Reserve uncovered eye-popping
> new details about how the U.S. provided a whopping $16 trillion in secret
> loans to bail out American and foreign banks and businesses during the
> worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. An amendment by Sen.
> Bernie Sanders to the Wall Street reform law passed one year ago this week
> directed the Government Accountability Office to conduct the study. "As a
> result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more
> than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest
> financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout
> the world," said Sanders. "This is a clear case of socialism for the rich
> and rugged, you're-on-your-own individualism for everyone else."
>
> Among the investigation's key findings is that the Fed unilaterally
> provided trillions of dollars in financial assistance to foreign banks and
> corporations from South Korea to Scotland, according to the GAO report. "No
> agency of the United States government should be allowed to bailout a
> foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the
> president," Sanders said.
>
> The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress also determined that the
> Fed lacks a comprehensive system to deal with conflicts of interest,
> despite the serious potential for abuse. In fact, according to the report,
> the Fed provided conflict of interest waivers to employees and private
> contractors so they could keep investments in the same financial
> institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans.
>
> For example, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase served on the New York Fed's board
> of directors at the same time that his bank received more than $390 billion
> in financial assistance from the Fed. Moreover, JP Morgan Chase served as
> one of the clearing banks for the Fed's emergency lending programs.
>
> In another disturbing finding, the GAO said that on Sept. 19, 2008, William
> Dudley, who is now the New York Fed president, was granted a waiver to let
> him keep investments in AIG and General Electric at the same time AIG and
> GE were given bailout funds. One reason the Fed did not make Dudley sell
> his holdings, according to the audit, was that it might have created the
> appearance of a conflict of interest.
>
> To Sanders, the conclusion is simple. "No one who works for a firm
> receiving direct financial assistance from the Fed should be allowed to sit
> on the Fed's board of directors or be employed by the Fed," he said.
>
> The investigation also revealed that the Fed outsourced most of its
> emergency lending programs to private contractors, many of which also were
> recipients of extremely low-interest and then-secret loans.
>
> The Fed outsourced virtually all of the operations of their emergency
> lending programs to private contractors like JP Morgan Chase, Morgan
> Stanley, and Wells Fargo. The same firms also received trillions of
> dollars in Fed loans at near-zero interest rates. Altogether some
> two-thirds of the contracts that the Fed awarded to manage its emergency
> lending programs were no-bid contracts. Morgan Stanley was given the
> largest no-bid contract worth $108.4 million to help manage the Fed bailout
> of AIG.
>
> A more detailed GAO investigation into potential conflicts of interest at
> the Fed is due on Oct. 18, but Sanders said one thing already is abundantly
> clear. "The Federal Reserve must be reformed to serve the needs of working
> families, not just CEOs on Wall Street."
>
> To read the GAO report, click here.
>
> </mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=133e13ab980ae6ab&attid=0.1.1&disp=emb&zw>
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
28 November 2011
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina
Prime Minister's Office
Old Sangsad Bhaban
Tejagaon, Dhaka-1215
Bangladesh
RE: Warning: Stop war against people; disband Rapid Action Battalion (RAB)
Dear Prime Minister,
I am William Nicholas Gomes, human rights activist and journalist. I have observed the overwhelming human rights violations in Bangladesh.
Your government is in war against the ordinary people of Bangladesh.
The state can be titled as dysfunctional under ruling of your government. Each and every ministry is corrupted with corruption. The judiciary and the law enforcement agencies became tools of subjugate the opposition parties or to anyone trying to expose the dysfunctional character of your government.
Your government is in war against, the people of Bangladesh. The government that you are leading is clearly is not pro people government. Your government became a government of few elected dictators by the cost of many and that is what set you in war against the people of Bangladesh.
The law enforcement agencies and the security forces care little for the ordinary people of Bangladesh. The special unit of Bangladesh police, killing squad Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) became the licensed killing tools of government; as a result the cross fire and now a days the disappearances had crossed any past record.
Due process of law does not exist in practice other than in the theory and in the law books in Bangladesh.
You had followed the legacy of politicizing the judiciary. Suppressing the Mass media , the share market had looted , people is now in road and every day your ministers are costing the people and living the life of luxury at the cost of ordinary people of Bangladesh.
US invasion on Iraq, Afghanistan were criticized by the progressive forces all over the world. The situations of Bangladesh became worst than the Iraq or Afghanistan, the imperialist find out the group betrayers lead by you. Then they need not to run any invasion in Bangladesh, your government is enough to loot the country's people by declaring war against them. There is no democracy in the country.
You had signed a secret agreement with the Indian government and by breaching the international human rights standard. You had guided the killing squad RAB to work with special unit Indian intelligence RAW to arrest and illegally hand over the Indian citizens, especially the people associated with United Liberation Front of Asom.
You have successfully used the law enforcement agencies, specially the killing squad Rapid action battalion. Our sources have confirmed that the intelligence unit of RAB has prepared a list of the political people who are very active in anti government activities. The list includes mainly the people of main opposition party, BNP and Jamat e Islami. These people will be tortured, killed and many of them will face enforced disappearances as the anti government movement grows. You are leading the nation towards violence .
I have lunch the SMS campaign as a part of my continuous effort to "BAN RAB". All the battalion of RAB , and every cabinet minister have already received the warning message and appeal to disband the RAB . I will continue to run the SMS camping until you disband the RAB and bring them under the law.
I warn you to stop war against the people of Bangladesh. Disband the Rapid action battalion now and form a special tribunal to investigate all the allegations of torture, cross fire, disappearances and make all possible effort to bring them under the law.
I thank you for the attention you give to this letter.
Sincerely,
William Nicholas Gomes
Journalist & Human Rights Activist
80/ B Bramon Chiron, Saydabad,
Dhaka-1203, Bangladesh.
Cell: +88 019 7 444 0 666
E-mail:William [at] williamgomes.org,editorbd[at]gmail.com
Skype: William.gomes9
Face book: www.facebook.com/williamnicholasgomes
Twitter: twitter.com/williamgomes
Web site :www.williamgomes.org
Link : http://williamnicholasgomes.blogspot.com/2011/11/stop-war-against-people-disband-rapid.html
William Nicholas Gomes