Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Military's Plans Against Riots in America

Eowyn | August 23, 2011 at 5:57 am | Tags: black flash mobs, CONPLAN 3501, CONPLAN 3502, Constitution Article I Sec 8, flash robs, hate crimes, London riots, riot control, USARNORTH, Wisconsin State Fair riot | Categories: crime, Economy, Liberals, Media, Military, Race, United States | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-8GD

You've seen the terrible riots in England.

We have them in America, too, such as the recent black riot at the Wisconsin State Fair. It's just that our media refuse to call them "riots," as if doing so will just magically make them go away.

That led the Investor's Business Daily to publish an editorial on August 12, 2011, pointing out that "Across the U.S., mobs of black youths are organizing on Facebook to loot stores and beat whites. Yet none dare call the 'flash mob' attacks hate crime, least of all the attorney general."

The media may play ostrich, but the U.S. military isn't.

An article by John Hudson for The Atlantic Wire, August 10, 2011, describes "The U.S. Military's Plan for London-Like Riots". The name of the plan is CONPLAN. Here are excerpts:

With British Prime Minister David Cameron authorizing the use of rubber bullets and water canons in wake of the turbulent London riots spreading through Britain, questions have been raised about how authorities in the U.S. would respond to a similar domestic disturbance threatening the nation's stability. According to National Journal's White House correspondent Marc Ambinder the U.S. already has a game plan in place.

"If what happened in London ever happened in the US, the military has plans -- CONPLAN 3501 and 3502 -- to suppress the 'insurrection,' he tweeted. [...]

According to the public policy organization GlobalSecurity.org, CONPLAN 3502 is the U.S. military's plan for assisting state and local authorities in the event of a riot or major civil disturbance: "Tasks performed by military forces may include joint patrolling with law enforcement officers; securing key buildings, memorials, intersections and bridges; and acting as a quick reaction force."

It derives its constitutional backing from Article I, Section 8 stating that "Congress shall have power... to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections, and repel Invasions" and is rumored to have been activated during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, during the 1999 Seattle WTO riots and during the 1992 Rodney King riots in Los Angeles. But, according to Nate Jones at the National Security Archive, "because historic Garden Plot activity was classified and current activity likely remains so, it is difficult to discern exactly how many times Garden Plot was evoked." What jarred Jones upon looking at internal military documents, were the "indicators of potential violence," which were especially racially oriented:

According to Global Security, the federal government's power to control civil disturbances was increased in 1970. Here's an outline of what that involved:

375,000 National Guardsmen and 14,000 Army Reservists had been trained in riot control as the year closed. The Army National Guard conducted, at the expense of regular training, sixteen hours of refresher civil disturbance training. Some states also carried out civil disturbance command post exercises in conjunction with local and state civil authorities. The Army Reserve had three infantry brigades which were part of the federal military contingency force for the control of civil disturbances. These units also conducted sixteen hours of refresher civil disturbance training at the expense of primary training. This additional responsibility of the Reserve Components called for their immediate availability in times of natural disasters, civil disturbances, and other emergencies.

Update: Ambinder also points to an Army slideshow detailing more about CONPLAN 3501. One of the slides has a breakdown of what army officers are in charge of which areas of the country. Click the link to see the whole slideshow.

~Eowyn

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Good News! Fairness Doctrine is Dead

Eowyn | August 23, 2011 at 9:47 am | Tags: FCC, free speech, Julius Genachowski, Obama administration | Categories: Liberals, Media, United States | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-8TT

Amidst dreary news about the economy, we have a piece of good news.

Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission gave a killing karaté chop to the Orwellian-named "Fairness Doctrine"!

Brooks Boliek of Politico reports, August 22, 2011, that the FCC also axed more than 80 media industry rules.

Earlier this summer FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski already had agreed to erase the post WWII-era "doctrine", but the action Monday puts the last nail into the coffin for the regulation that sought to ensure discussion over the airwaves of controversial issues did not exclude any particular point of view. A broadcaster that violated the rule risked losing its license.

While the commission voted in 1987 to do away with the rule — a legacy to a time when broadcasting was a much more dominant voice than it is today — the language implementing it was never removed. The move Monday, once published in the federal register, effectively erases the rule.

Monday's move is part of the commission's response to a White House executive order directing a "government-wide review of regulations already on the books" designed to eliminate unnecessary regulations.

Also consigned to the regulatory dustbin are the "broadcast flag" digital copy protection rule that was struck down by the courts and the cable programming service tier rate. Altogether, the agency tossed 83 rules and regs.

Genachowski said in a statement that the move was aimed at promoting "a healthy climate for private investment and job creation." Both the Obama administration and the FCC have come under criticism by business groups over laws and regulations such as health care reform and net neutrality rules.

I'm still incredulous that the Obama administration actually did something right....

~Eowyn

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

CA courts need cleansing

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2009/apr/county-gives-illegal-alien-
child-molester-4-million

Lawmakers in one of California's largest counties have secretly
approved
awarding an illegal immigrant child molester more than $4 million
because
he was beaten by fellow inmates while in custody.

The Orange County Board of Supervisors made the decision in a closed-
door
session, according to an local newspaper that made the settlement
public
this week. The lawsuit had been filed by an illegal immigrant from
Mexico
who was jailed after molesting a 6-year-old girl at a park.

The illegal alien, 24-year-old Fernando Ramirez, eventually pleaded
guilty
to a lesser charge of battery. While incarcerated at the county's
central
jail, Ramirez was severely beaten by other inmates and his attorney
says
deputies in charge were elsewhere during the attack.

Ramirez suffered brain damage and is unable to walk unassisted,
according
to his attorney, who says his client has also been left with the
intellect
of a 4-year-old child. That's two years younger than the girl he
molested.

The back door settlement, never the less paid with tax dollars, is the
county's largest ever for an in-custody incident involving sheriffs.
All
five Orange County Board of Supervisors refuse to comment on the deal
even
though constituents certainly have the right to know since it's their
money. The illegal alien's family will get $3.75 million and $900,000
will
go to medical liens rendered while in custody.

Located in southern California, Orange County is the state's third
most
populous with about 3 million residents. The area is well-known for
its
amusement-park attractions, such as Disneyland, and more than 40 miles
of
scenic coastline. Like every other municipality in the (not so) Golden
State, the area is suffering through an unprecedented financial
crisis.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Another Reason We Don't Want Gingrich To Be President

Another Reason We Don't Want Gingrich To Be President
Posted by Laurence Vance on August 23, 2011 07:39 AM

Some readers of this blog may not be old enough to remember the House banking scandal in 1992. Gingrich (and others of both parties) wrote a number of overdrafts. Gingrich even wrote a check for over $9,000 to the IRS as part of his abuse of check-writing privileges. And people think Newt will be a fiscal conservative in the White House?

Republicans have short memories. As long as a Republican didn't sell out yesterday, he is okay.

Legal Obedience

Legal Obedience
Walter E. Williams

What laws are we morally obligated to obey? Help with the answer can be found in "Economic Liberty and the Constitution," a 66-page pamphlet by Jacob G. Hornberger, founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.

Hornberger offers a hypothetical whereby Congress enacts a compulsory church attendance law that requires children to attend church service each Sunday. Parents are penalized if their children fail to comply. Would there be any moral or constitutional legitimacy to such a congressional mandate? The law would be a clear violation of one's natural, or God-given, rights to life and liberty. As to whether it would be constitutional, we have to see whether mandating church attendance is one of those enumerated powers of Congress found in Article 1, Section 8 of our Constitution. We'd find no such authority. Our anti-federalist Founding Fathers didn't trust Congress with religious liberty, so they sought to protect it with the First Amendment to explicitly deny Congress the power to mandate religious conduct. Suppose there's widespread popular support for a church-going mandate and the U.S. Supreme Court rules it constitutional; do Americans have a moral obligation to obey the law?

You might say, "Williams, while there are gray areas in the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court would never brazenly rule against clear constitutional prohibitions!" That's nonsense. The first clause of Article 1, Section 10 mandates that "No State shall ... pass any ... Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts." During the Great Depression, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Minnesota law that restricted the ability of banks to foreclose on overdue mortgages, thereby impairing contracts made between lender and borrower. To prevent this kind of contract impairment routinely done under the Articles of Confederation was precisely why the Framers added the clause.

Another, perhaps more egregious example of the Supreme Court's impairing contracts came during President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, when the government nationalized gold and made it a felony for any American to own gold.
Not only was gold ownership made illegal but it nullified all "gold clauses" in private and government contracts. Writing contracts in gold was a way people protected themselves against government theft, namely inflation. The Supreme Court upheld federal nationalization of gold and nullification of gold contracts in the famous Gold Clause Cases. Today many Americans have turned to gold, driving its price to an all-time high, as a safeguard against what they see as pending inflation. Here's my question to you: If Obama and Congress enacted a law demanding that you turn in your gold, would you be morally obligated to obey such a law?

Decent people should not obey immoral laws. What's moral and immoral can be a contentious issue, but there are some broad guides for deciding what laws and government actions are immoral. Lysander S. Spooner, one of America's great 19th-century thinkers, said no person or group of people can "authorize government to destroy or take away from men their natural rights; for natural rights are inalienable, and can no more be surrendered to government which is but an association of individuals than to a single individual." French economist/philosopher Frederic Bastiat (1801-50) gave a test for immoral government acts: "See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime ." He added in his book "The Law," "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law."

After reading Hornberger's "Economic Liberty and the Constitution," one cannot avoid the conclusion that the liberties envisioned by the nation's founders have been under siege, trivialized and nullified. Philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe explained that "no one is as hopelessly enslaved as the person who thinks he's free." That's becoming an apt description for Americans who are oblivious to or ignorant of the liberties we've lost.

http://www.creators.com/opinion/walter-williams.html

The Relevancy of Ron Paul vs. the Coming Irrelevancy of the Status-Quo

The Relevancy of Ron Paul vs. the Coming Irrelevancy of the Status-Quo
by Susan Westfall

On the heels of the Ames Straw Poll results, we find the media doing almost exactly that which Neil Cavuto proposed as a hypothetical situation during his interview with Dr. Paul from the Straw Poll grounds. Namely – what if you do well, and no one reports it? As expected by everyone with even a partial brain, Ron Paul did fantastically well in the Straw Poll. His message of individual liberty, sound money and free trade with all – minus the financial and military entanglements that have helped bring us to the brink of ruin – is resounding so strongly with people everywhere that the two candidates best thought by many to represent the popular freedom message, were able to capture over 9000 votes between them. That they did so in the very heartland of America is an implacable declaration of what people are looking for in their next president. Granted, Ms. Bachman can't really pass muster as a liberty candidate in most of her actions and votes, but she initially sounds good trying and the media were ecstatic, touting her first place victory from the highest media mountaintops. Ron Paul finished by capturing such a close second place win that 153 more votes would have put him in the lead. Even crickets would have been astounded at the total silence that accompanied Dr. Paul's achievement. None of the grassroots were too surprised, however. We've been watching the media play the same disgusting marginalization games since 2007. We predicted it would happen too, but didn't waste breath on the idea that it might be "hypothetical". Regardless, I salute Mr. Cavuto for actually pointing out the possibility that not only might the emperor be waltzing about buck-naked on the morrow, but he'd likely be stinking drunk as well. It's about time. The media has been complicit in the slow erosion of liberty and the disintegration of our Republic for far, far too long.

Let's begin with a Youtube video that made the rounds at a brisk pace last Sunday titled " Being Ron Paul: The Media Fix is In." It pretty much says it all and covers a variety of MSM contributions about the Straw Poll results. The ire and disgust at the pathetic and blatantly obvious removal or marginalization of Ron Paul's close finish with Michelle Bachman is evident in the poster's voice. That same sentiment was massively evidenced in the comments and responses to MSM articles and personal blog posts across the Internet world. The manner in which Matt Strawn reported the Straw Poll results live on CNN clearly announced the coming marginalization storm. Can anyone recall or point out another time in the recent history of Ames Straw Polls (or at any time in its history) when only the first place winner's name was announced, followed immediately by the announcer exiting stage right briskly and wordlessly? "Stunned" probably does not even begin to describe the reactions of millions of viewers to that event. Even the panel of commentators was thrown off stride. Their reactions called to my mind a panel scene from the 2008 elections, when CNN was reporting the South Carolina primary. I remember quite clearly Anderson Cooper's glazed look, when the reported numbers suddenly seemed to take a dramatically different track from where they had been previously going, magnified and reflected by the robotic expressions and stammered comments of the panel.

But I digress. Back to the video. At 3:11 a.m. Monday morning the view count was still stuck at 301 views – the exact same number it was on at 4 p.m. Sunday, when I viewed it the first time. Having seen links to it all over Twitter and Facebook on more occasions than I can count, I would expect it to have at least gone up some from when I first viewed it. Youtube has long been accused by many of suppressing view counts, which was of course poo-pooed as "conspiracy theory". Based on the improbable immobility of the view count on just this one video, it doesn't appear to be just theory in this case. Why? The "Gummy Bear" video can shoot up a million views in one day, but apparently something with real substance in it's content must be held down lest the citizenry get over-excited seeing the view count rise. An ineffectual technique at best, idiocy at the very least. Here's another excellent Youtube demonstrating media-weasel strong arm tactics. Now that your blood pressure is a least catching up (if not equal) to the slow pound mine has been building to for quite some time, here's a link to Jon Stewart's The Daily Show in which he echoes the incredulity of millions regarding the invisibility of Ron Paul. In the week since the Iowa Straw Poll there have been quite a number of stories in the media about Dr. Paul. A few of them honestly reporting his "top-tier" candidacy, as well as his fast growing influence and popularity. Many more continue to ignore, marginalize and weasel away. By far the majority address the media's own failure to report election news either realistically or honestly. An excellent example readily admits the collusion of all in the media phenomenon of "choosing" the candidates.

Now I don't have any exact numbers, but indications are excellent that the rest of America feels much as I do at this point in time. And I am bloody well tired of the media telling me what I should think, believe, understand or discuss. I am MORE than tired of them "choosing" pre-packaged, pre-approved and appropriately groomed candidates for my voting edification (and by groomed I don't mean attired, although I'm downright sick of the emphasis placed on that as well). I do NOT want to vote for the preferred cut-out-party doll of the day, week, or month. I don't give one whit what the "experts" paraded out each day by the media have to say about who is the front-runner or who is electable, nor do I believe a word they say. What makes them more expert than I or any other American? Their wonderfully prescient warnings regarding Fanny-Mae and Freddie-Mac? Their correctness regarding unconstitutional cake-walk wars? Their fantastic ability to predict the economic statistics they write? Thanks, but NO THANKS! I will do my own vetting and reach my own conclusions regarding any candidate that runs for office, high or low. The Internet offers each and every American the ability to easily check any candidates past voting record, their support for or against pertinent legislation, and a myriad of other insights into their character, beliefs and daily actions.

Given the choice that the Internet offers us all today, how long will we as a people continue to accept the endless lies pumped at us day in and day out by media hacks who neither represent the news honestly, nor have the guts to stand up and stop the idiocy themselves? That we should assign blame to the talking heads only and stop there however, is as ridiculous as their present efforts to pretend by omission that Ron Paul is not a top-tier contender in the GOP nominee election process. Those working in the media are at the very least guilty of misrepresenting the truth and at the worst complicit in cover-ups of God knows what criminal activities for those powerful entities that hand them their approved talking point and candidate lists on a daily basis. For decades, at least since the 60s, the media has been disgustingly subservient to "other interests" starting with the Federal Reserve and permeating through all the industrial complexes (military, medical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, etc.) as well as all their corporatist cronies. They haven't just been "wagging the dog", they've been wagging us to maintain the desired status-quo of wealth-transfer, empire-building, and war-for-plunder. Enough, I say.

Admitted or not, the American people are "mad as hell and not going to take it anymore." The tipping point has been reached and the people are done with games. Ron Paul and the ideas he speaks of, as well as the solutions he offers will not be swept under the rug again. Just because the revolution isn't being televised does not mean it won't and isn't occurring. It's not only occurring, but will overcome. Liberty and the restoration of the Republic will move forward to victory in the hands of the real grassroots, the American people – and they don't need a complicit media or approval from the "powers that be" to achieve it. As Ron Paul has often said, "An idea whose time has come will not be stopped by any government or any army [media or otherwise]."

http://ksa4liberty.com/2011/08/22/the-relevancy-of-ron-paul-vs-the-coming-irrelevancy-of-the-status-quo/

More on the Electric Edsel

More on the Electric Edsel
August 20, 2011
By eric

Well, here's a surprise – the Chevy Volt electric car isn't selling.

Only 3,200 of these $41,000 "economy" cars have found buyers so far – most of them probably in the Hollywood hills, where it is trendy for the rich to show green (Leonardo DiCaprio owns a $100k Tesla electric roadster).

But out in the real world, the idea of a $41k "economy" car doesn't parse. Yes, the Volt is a brilliant piece of engineering. But that's neither here nor there if it costs more to operate than a standard economy car, which is ultimately the only criteria that matters as far as the marketplace viability of electric cars.

This is so obvious that you'd think it might have also occurred to the people running GM. It probably did – but the reason it doesn't matter to them is that the Volt (like the Tesla) is a taxpayer-funded money machine for GM. Even if they never sell enough cars to make an honest profit, there's already been a huge profit to GM in the form of massive federal subsidies and of course, the massive bailout of GM itself back in 2008.

Why not throw money at the electric car boondoggle? After all, it's not GM's money.

And that is the nut of this tragedy. And it is a tragedy, because we should be developing (or at least looking into) alternative means of transport. The idea is not bad. The problem is the distortions created by government meddling – by corporatist-statist polices that throw enormous resources at projects that make no sense.

You know, like a $41,000 "economy" car that costs as much to buy as a fully loaded BMW 3-Series but which can't match the day-to-day performance of a $15,000 Toyota Corolla.

Consider:

It is 1890 and horse travel is becoming problematic. The horses poo all over the place, making a disgusting mess in crowded urban areas – and they're just not practical for speedy, efficient travel in a rapidly industrializing nation. Did the government start throwing billions (well, millions in those days) at politically connected big businesses to develop an alternative?

The answer, of course, is no.

Inventors thought about the problem and tinkered. The internal combustion engine (gas and diesel) was invented – and perfected. It became reliable – and soon, affordable. Henry Ford and others like him came along. Cars replaced horses. And – a key fact – impractical cars such as the early steam-powered and electric cars – were dropped in favor of practical cars like the Model T, which put the country (not just the elites) behind the wheel.

There was no federal subsidization of steam or electric cars, so when it became clear these kinds of cars could not compete in the market with internal combustion-powered cars, they were abandoned. For the most part, people stopped trying to make them because – revelation – very few customers were interested in buying them.

If we had a free market today, the Volt would never have been built – because it's obvious to anyone with half a brain that no potential buyer concerned about the cost of transportation (note, not gas per se) is going to be the least bit interested in laying out $41,000 to buy a vehicle that will take years – perhaps decades – of driving to become cost-competitive with any standard-issue gas powered economy car.

Instead, we have a billion-dollar electric car boondoggle. And not only won't they (GM and Tesla) take the hint and quit, they'll keep at it – demanding more tax dollars, more subsidies, more rebates to "encourage" sales of these otherwise unsalable electric Edsels.

Meanwhile, all the money that has been sucked out of the private sector is no longer available to let a latter-day tinkerer – a latter-day Henry Ford – develop an electric (or other alternative) car that might actually make sense. One that people might actually buy because it is more efficient, more cost-effective, than a current gas-powered car.

And not only that.

Thanks to Everests of federal (EPA, DOT) red tape it is almost impossible for anyone other than a "major automaker" – that is, a corporate cartel – to lawfully build and sell a car of any kind at all. There is a reason why we only have a relative handful of car brands – all of them massive combines – because only massive combines have the economic resources to do things like destroy 100 brand-new cars in crash tests to prove to Uncle that they comply with the ukase Uncle has set forth. Oh, and also to get huge handouts from the government to prop up inefficient business models and let them build pie-in-the-sky engineering demonstrators without any real consideration of their practical or economic viability.

If government got out of the motors business I have no doubt we'd not only have 70 MPG conventional cars that cost less than $10,0000 we'd also in short order have commercially viable electric cars as well as cars powered by sources we haven't even heard of yet. There are countless ingenious backyard inventors out there. There is probably almost nothing they could not achieve, given the opportunity – and if they were allowed to proceed.

But the octupus of government stands in the way, richly rewarding the impossible -and the incompetent – while strangling anything that might actually work in its crib.

http://epautos.com/2011/08/20/more-on-the-electric-edsel/

Libya -- what the Moslems are saying

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: niyas abbas <niyasabbas@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:53 AM
Subject: [realwideminds] Re: Another Western Pampered Tyrant is Down ......
To: Bawwa Bawwa <bawwa.bawwa@gmail.com>
Cc: LALITH KARUNARATNA <lalithkarunaratna@hotmail.com>, Shadi Katyal <shadikatyal@yahoo.com>, Trishool <lalhgehi@yahoo.com>, wediriwira@yahoo.co.uk, jimmybug@rocketmail.com, protectmyreligion@yahoogroups.com, wideminds@yahoogroups.com, media_monitor5@yahoogroups.com, Mukesh Varma <mukeshvarma@yahoo.com>, muragala@yahoogroups.com, realwideminds@yahoogroups.com, savesrilanka@yahoogroups.com, wasadesa@yahoogroups.com, Bernard Kulatileka <aaloka27@hotmail.com>, real heart <realheartsrilankan@gmail.com>, Muragala Owner <muragala-owner@yahoogroups.com>, Babu Sushilan <babusushilan@yahoo.com>, Ruwan Weerasinghe <protectnation@yahoo.com>, Suresh Pundamon <ssk699@yahoo.com>, Thomas Kurian <ttk6999@yahoo.com>, nagaraj patil <patil_nagaraj@yahoo.com>, jayatilakapriyantha@hotmail.co.uk, Ranjith Silva <ranjitdes@hotmail.com>, pubudu shiran <pubudushiran@hotmail.com>, protectmyreligion@gmail.com, sachitra@gmail.com, slsoc@uqconnect.net, Suranee <suranee1@gmail.com>, agsameera@yahoo.com, voice_of_army@yahoo.com, dharmadveepairanama@yahoo.com, patriotic_srilankan@yahoogroups.com, ratasaa@yahoo.com, sanjeewadinesh@gmail.com, tvpbandara@yahoo.com.au, Jim Binks <jbinks998@gmail.com>, asiantribune@hotmail.com, Shamika Soysa <shamikabsb@hotmail.com>, Nakeeb Issadeen <nakeebi@yahoo.com>, sri_lankan_friends@yahoogroups.com, Srilanka_Friends@yahoogroups.com, realheartsrilanka@gmail.com, SellandaKolla Real Heart <sellandakolla@gmail.com>, S kumar <kumar_8134@yahoo.com>, sinhalayo@yahoogroups.com, sihalene60@yahoo.ca, Patriotic_Srilankan@yahoogroups.com, avigdormiller@gmail.com

Gadafi was the sweet heart of British and americans when they installed him in
1969. Man you ignorant Bawwwa .... He was their friend until they realized his
days are numbered. Now they supported the Mujahideen not because of their love
... but to get a hold on Libya's oil. They have the largest reserve in Africa
and the best crude. Hmmm .... man you are a real gona ...

But it was the Mujahideen with the help of Allah who liberated. NATO crimianls
bombed mostly the civilians. and the infra structure so that they can have a big
stake on the re-construction, as usual. We don't trust them ... they are
vultures ....

Niyas

________________________________
From: Bawwa Bawwa <bawwa.bawwa@gmail.com>
To: niyas abbas <niyasabbas@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: LALITH KARUNARATNA <lalithkarunaratna@hotmail.com>; nakeebi@yahoo.com; Shadi
Katyal <shadikatyal@yahoo.com>; Trishool <lalhgehi@yahoo.com>;
wediriwira@yahoo.co.uk; jimmybug@rocketmail.com;
protectmyreligion@yahoogroups.com; wideminds@yahoogroups.com;
media_monitor5@yahoogroups.com; Mukesh Varma <mukeshvarma@yahoo.com>;
muragala@yahoogroups.com; realwideminds@yahoogroups.com;
savesrilanka@yahoogroups.com; wasadesa@yahoogroups.com; Bernard Kulatileka
<aaloka27@hotmail.com>; real heart <realheartsrilankan@gmail.com>; Muragala
Owner <muragala-owner@yahoogroups.com>; Babu Sushilan <babusushilan@yahoo.com>;
Ruwan Weerasinghe <protectnation@yahoo.com>; Suresh Pundamon <ssk699@yahoo.com>;
Thomas Kurian <ttk6999@yahoo.com>; nagaraj patil <patil_nagaraj@yahoo.com>;
jayatilakapriyantha@hotmail.co.uk; Ranjith Silva <ranjitdes@hotmail.com>; pubudu
shiran <pubudushiran@hotmail.com>; Kumar <kumar_8134@yahoo.com>;
protectmyreligion@gmail.com; sachitra@gmail.com; slsoc@uqconnect.net; Suranee
<suranee1@gmail.com>; agsameera@yahoo.com; voice_of_army@yahoo.com;
dharmadveepairanama@yahoo.com; patriotic_srilankan@yahoogroups.com;
ratasaa@yahoo.com; sanjeewadinesh@gmail.com; tvpbandara@yahoo.com.au; Jim Binks
<jbinks998@gmail.com>; asiantribune@hotmail.com; Shamika Soysa
<shamikabsb@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tue, 23 August, 2011 13:50:59
Subject: Re: Another Western Pampered Tyrant is Down ......

Gon Thadiya,

It is the Americans and Europeans who bombarded Libya against Muammar Gaddafi
and made the way for the anti-Gaddafi fighting formations to attack Gaddafi
loyalists and capture the power from Gaddafi. And you stupid Neo-Ass, you should
also know that those anti-Gaddafi elements were trained and armed only by the
Americans and Europeans. (And clearly this process is not happening with the
help of "Allah" as you dream) .

So you tell me who are the western sponsored puppets in this war.

And also tell me,

WHERE IS ALLAH AND WHAT THE HELL HE HAS BEEN DOING HIDING SOMEWHERE WHILE HIS
UMMAS ARE KILLING UMMAS IN HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS.???

Mahesh

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:06 PM, niyas abbas <niyasabbas@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

This is great news for the Muslim Ummah .... With the help of Allah Libya is in
the hands of Islam once more .... The change is coming .... West is trying to
take control ... but Insha Allah Islam will prevail .... Libya is the land of
Omar Mukhtar a great Mujahideen who deifed the Italian occupiers ..... These are
children of Omar Mukhtar .... Our prayers for the liberated people of Libya ....
>
>Next will be Syria ..... Insha Allah and then, Yemen and Algeria ....
>
>Western backed Tyrants are now falling one by one ..... while America is
>collapsing from its finalcial nightmares .... Allahu Akbar ....
>
> Niyas

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic ()

Recent Activity:

New Members 1

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___

JP Quran and Hadith

Thanks & Best regards,

Imran Ilyas
Dubai
Cell: 00971509483403

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

my morning transAtlantic discussion of American history

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mario Huet <mario@libertarian.co.uk>
Date: Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [LA-F] old England
To: libertarian-alliance-forum@yahoogroups.com

On 23/08/2011 12:53, Bruce Majors wrote:

Funny. There is a Deal (may be spelled Deale) in a rural area south of Annapolis, Maryland, in Anne Arundel county, obviously named after one of your Queen Annes (beside a Maryland County called Prince George's County and another called Caroline county). Nearby, across the Chesapeake Bay are some towns getting close to the Atlantic ocean, St. Michael's, Salisbury, and Easton.

During the American revolution the British were going to fire cannons at night, I think from ships, at Easton and St. Michael's, to subdue the rebels. The proto-Americans hung lamps in some trees for misdirection and the British fired on a woods a few miles away thinking the lights were the town.

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Mario Huet <mario@libertarian.co.uk> wrote:

If it happened today, the lamps would all be smashed by environmentally responsible Americans. They'd probably also tell us exactly where to fire, so as to cause the least disruption to innocent plants and insects.

--  Mario Huet e-mail: mario@libertarian.co.uk                **************************************************               *   Words cannot picture her; but all men know   *               * That solemn sketch the pure sad artist wrought *               **************************************************                        James Thomson, The City of Dreadful Night

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (4)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Subscribe: libertarian-alliance-forum-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: libertarian-alliance-forum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

NB - The Libertarian Alliance does not necessarily approve of the above message.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___

Economic Stimulus

Sometime this year, we taxpayers will again receive another 'Economic Stimulus' payment.

This is indeed a very exciting program, and I'll explain it by
using a Q & A format:

Q. What is an 'Economic Stimulus' payment ?

A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers.

Q.. Where will the government get this money?

A. From taxpayers.

Q. So the government is giving me back my own
money?

A. Only a smidgen of it.

Q. What is the purpose of this payment?

A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a
high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.

Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China ?

A. Shut up.

Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the U.S. economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:

* If you spend the stimulus money at Wal-Mart, the money will go to China or Sri Lanka .

* If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the Arabs.

* If you purchase a computer, it will go to India , Taiwan or China .

* If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico , Honduras , and Guatemala ..

* If you buy an efficient car, it will go to Japan or Korea .

* If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan .

* If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go
to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore.

Instead, keep the money in America by:

1) Spending it at yard sales, or

2) Going to ball games, or

3) Spending it on prostitutes, or

4) Beer or

5) Tattoos.

(These are the only American businesses still operating in the U.S. )

Conclusion:

Go to a ball game with a tattooed prostitute that you
met at a yard sale and drink beer all day!

No need to thank me, I'm just glad I could be of help.

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___

new English MasterCard

Something from the British riots…….

True, but tragic…

JP FW: Column - Javed Ch

Fwd: District Files Motion to Dismiss ACLU Suit Over Georgetown Incident and more from Georgetown Patch


	View as Webpage

Today

83° 65° Tomorrow

86° 71°

August 23, 2011

Your News

District Files Motion to Dismiss ACLU Suit Over Georgetown Incident

Shaun Courtney | Aug 23, 2011 | 0 Comments

A suit filed in June alleges that police officers violated a photographer's First Amendment rights

DDOT News Release: First Streetcar Line Ready in 2013

Shaun Courtney | Aug 22, 2011 | 0 Comments

DDOT action will enable opening of the first streetcar line no later than mid-2013.

HMX Group Retail Store to Fill Former Reiss Space on Wisconsin Avenue

Shaun Courtney | Aug 22, 2011 | 0 Comments

The upscale men's clothier will open at 1254 Wisconsin Ave.

Verizon Strike Ends, But Negotiations Still Appear Rocky

Dusty Smith | Aug 22, 2011 | 0 Comments

Workers to return, but company, unions still have not reached agreement on a contract.

St. Albans Selects New Headmaster and Athletic Director from Within

Marty Chase | Aug 22, 2011 | 0 Comments

The Bulldogs also added new staff, including football coach Cornelius Greene

See more News »

Video Profile

Fitness Together

Located in Georgetown, Fitness Together prides itself on providing individual attention to each of its members. Fitness Together is …

Watch Video »

Things to Do

12:00am

Writopia Lab Creative Writing Workshops

Writopia Lab is an award-winning non-profit organization that holds creative writing workshops for kids and teens. Week-long …

6:00am

Sew-in Hair Extensions (Undetectable) and Custom Wig Party

Georgetown! Hollywood Celebrity Hair Stylist Sapphire is coming to YOU!! Want to look like the celebrities?? Ready to upgrade your …

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

All Day

Writopia Lab Creative Writing Workshops

6:00am

Sew-in Hair Extensions (Undetectable) and Custom Wig Party

7:30am

Business Networking Breakfast

10:00am

"Location, Location, Location"

See more Events »

You can also:

Answer community questions »

Buy and sell stuff »

Send us news tips »

You got this email because you asked for it! (At Georgetown Patch) But if you want to stop getting it—or get other updates—you can manage your newsletter settings here.

Manage Subscriptions | Privacy Policy

Patch Media Corporation 584 Broadway, Suite 808, New York, NY 10012