--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
How come nobody shows up to rallies anymore?You aren't very smart in the most basic sense, Are you?
I'm guessing you will start to see them show up when they actually
start having the rallies again.
By my memory, That usually happens around election time. You just
might figure that out later.
Interesting that you have no substantitive political arguement. Just
slurs and desparages.
Way to go.
On Aug 7, 12:49 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ONLY 3% of the USA according to Pew supports The
> TEA-Fags Most are from tailer parks and mental institutions. You can
> paste all the propaganda from Koch financed web sites if you want> but it's all donkey shit! How come nobody shows up to rallies anymore?
> The only people who supports the tea baggers is the liberal news
> media. The coroprate news media never covers left wing protests like
> Wisconsin? But you get 10 tea honkeys milling around with Obama is
> socialist signs, the liberal news media is all over that! Why is that?
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
You aren't very smart in the most basic sense, Are you?
I'm guessing you will start to see them show up when they actually
start having the rallies again.
By my memory, That usually happens around election time. You just
might figure that out later.
Interesting that you have no substantitive political arguement. Just
slurs and desparages.
Way to go.
On Aug 7, 12:49 pm, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ONLY 3% of the USA according to Pew supports The
> TEA-Fags Most are from tailer parks and mental institutions. You can
> paste all the propaganda from Koch financed web sites if you want
> but it's all donkey shit! How come nobody shows up to rallies anymore?
> The only people who supports the tea baggers is the liberal news
> media. The coroprate news media never covers left wing protests like
> Wisconsin? But you get 10 tea honkeys milling around with Obama is
> socialist signs, the liberal news media is all over that! Why is that?
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
The truth is, that the Democratic Party now openly advocates socialism, which by its very definition, is some middle ground and transition to communism. Although the Democrats used to try and evade the moniker, and distance themselves from being classified as socialists, they do so no more. Congresswoman Maxine Waters, (D. Cal.) several months ago, parroted the Venezuelan socialist dictator, Hugo Chavez, calling for the nationalization of the oil companies:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaY3LhJ-IQ
Current Chicago Mayor, former Obama Administration Chief of Staff, and former House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) said:
"So if there's any seriousness about what some of our Republican colleagues are saying here in the House and elsewhere about improving the number of refineries, then maybe they'd be willing to have these refineries owned publicly, owned by the people of the United States, so that the people of the United States can determine how much of the product is refined and put out on the market.
"To me, that sounds like a very good idea."
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/why_do_we_call_them_democrats.html
Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) on June 18, 2008 in a Press Conference of the Democratic Leadership said:
"Should the people of the United States own refineries? Maybe so. Frankly, I think that's a good idea. Then we could control the amount of refined product much more capably that gets out on the market...
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/why_do_we_call_them_democrats.html
Democrats openly call for redistribution of wealth in our Nation, they call for socialized medicine, socialized energy, and in general, the Democratic Party openly advocates the federal government's involvement in each and every facet of our lives. Period. What part of the above can you sit here and argue, Lil' Stevie, with a straight face, is NOT socialism?
By example, here in President Obama's own words, he openly advocates a redistribution of wealth:
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/195153.html
Of course, Vice President Biden believes that a socialist, "redistribution of wealth" plan, is the "patriotic thing to do":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCqgNWRjmAc
Here Lil' Stevie, is the definition of socialism, (which I had encouraged you to go and look up for yourself) you are clearly uninformed as to what the term means:
"Date: 1837. From Latin socialis for "friend" or "companion" or "associate". Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods; usually there is no private property; in Marxist theory this is also considered just a transitional stage between capitalism and communism and it is distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done."
The above definition is by Mr. John Spargo, from his work titled: "Socialism, A Summary And Interpretation Of Socialist Principles" (McMillan & Co. 1913). Below is the Wiki definition, which is quite similar.
"Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. A stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done"
There is no question that President Obama is calling for the very tenets of socialism, which is the forerunner of communism, and a economic and political system that has failed miserably throughout recorded history. President Obama's, and many Democrats' belief, is that "Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Trotskyism, and Stalinism were all wonderful political, social and economic systems, we just haven't had the right folks try and implement them yet!"
====================
Name one idiot! Are the oil companies nationalized yet? Oh? Could it
On Aug 7, 10:46 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Why does it offend you, (and other socialists) when one identifies the type
> of economic, social and political ideology that our President and the
> current Democratic Party Platform advocates and espouses? This is not name
> calling, this is an actuality, a fact, an accurate description.
be Obama supports Free Enterprise you moron!
>Hey! Shit for brains! I am not a socialist! But you too dense to
> Unlike you, and your socialist brethren, when you call folks "Fags";
> "Terrorists", and "racists". You demonstrate your hatred, and your lack of
> any defense to your socialist political activitism.
figure that out!
>Why don't put your ma! Mas photo up!
> Once again, a picture says a thousand words:
>> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Stephen Stink <not4ud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > A Koch Brothers ass is kissed!
> > WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.> Lil'MoonbatStevie.In.Search.Of.George.Soros..jpg
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
> 79KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ONLY 3% of the USA according to Pew supports The
TEA-Fags Most are from tailer parks and mental institutions. You can
paste all the propaganda from Koch financed web sites if you want to
but it's all donkey shit! How come nobody shows up to rallies anymore?
The only people who supports the tea baggers is the liberal news
media. The coroprate news media never covers left wing protests like
Wisconsin? But you get 10 tea honkeys milling around with Obama is
socialist signs, the liberal news media is all over that! Why is that?
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
A Koch Brothers ass is kissed!
WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
http://www.williamgomes.org/blog/?p=147
August8, 2011
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina
Prime Minister's Office
Old Sangsad Bhaban
Tejagaon, Dhaka-1215
Bangladesh
RE: Urges For Fair War Crimes Trials in Bangladesh
Dear Prime Minister,
I am William Gomes, human rights activist and journalist from Bangladesh presently in exile in Hong Kong. I welcome your government's commitment to bring to justice those responsible for serious human rights abuses in 1971.
I strongly support a successful legal and judicial process that is fair and impartial in holding the perpetrators of crimes accountable. Justice for victims of these atrocities is long overdue. Those responsible have evaded justice for far too long.
The ICCPR contains key provisions on fair trials and the rights of accused persons. Bangladesh's obligations as a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Bangladesh is a state party. It is essential that all aspects of the ICT's work meet the international standard.
I came to know that British barrister Toby Cadman, representing five of the seven men detained by the International Crimes Tribunal on allegations of committing international crimes during the 1971 war of independence, was prevented from entering Bangladesh on Friday.
Cadman was seeking a 'visa on arrival' which he has successfully obtained on the four other occasions he had come to Bangladesh.
Cadman belongs to the barristers' chambers 9 Bedford Row in London, and has been instructed, along with two other lawyers from the same chambers, Steven Kay QC and John Cammegh by the Jamaat-e-Islami, to provide legal assistance to the party's five leaders currently detained by the ICT.
I want to remind you that in a letter in March to the Bangladesh law and foreign ministers, the US ambassador of war crimes at large, Stephen Rapp, had encouraged the government to agree to allowing involvement of foreign lawyers at the tribunal.
The field of international crimes is highly specialized and the participation of foreign counsel, particularly those who have litigated cases in the international and hybrid courts and tribunals, is very important to ensure that uniform or generally agreed standards are observed in practice,' his letter stated.
I urge to Bangladeshi government to better guarantee fair trials for those accused of war crimes during the country's 1971 war of independence.
I want to remind you that New York-based Human Rights Watch said in a statement this week that Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal, set up by the government last year to hold fair and credible trials for crimes against humanity during the independence war, needs to be brought into compliance with international standards.
Rule 16(2) states that, "No person during investigation under the Act shall be subjected to any form of coercion, duress or threat of any kind." This is a welcome statement of principle that is consistent with the Convention against Torture (CAT), to which Bangladesh is a state party. The CAT defines torture as any act by which "severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third party committed...intimidating or coercing him or third person, or for any reasons based on discrimination of any kind," where such pain or suffering is carried out either with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.
As Bangladesh's law enforcement agencies have a long history of torture and using coercion and duress to force criminal suspects to confess to crimes. In several time there were allegations from the from the detained in ICT that they were physically and mentally tortured. I urge you to consider allegations of torture or mistreatment and to provide an appropriate remedy. It will be important for the credibility of the ICT for all allegations of torture or mistreatment to be impartially investigated promptly and transparently.
I also want to remind you that while Bangladesh has promised to meet international standards, I hope the government; especially you will honor that commitment.
I am very much concern about the accused the right to the presumption of innocence, a fair and public hearing with counsel of their choice and the possibility of bail.
Recently the British barrister Toby Cadman has been refused by the Bangladesh government to enter into Bangladesh that raises a question about the impartiality of the government towards the free and fair trial.
I highly condemn regarding autocratic attitude of the government towards the human rights lawyer Toby Cadman.
I trust that you will take immediate action into this matter.
Yours sincerely,
William Nicholas Gomes
Journalist and Human Rights Activist
E-mail:William@williamgomes.org
http://www.williamgomes.org/blog/?p=147
--
Tea Fags! Yep....They only want White Patriotism! They Hate Multi-
Cultural Patriotism!
Wheeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Khi Pk 9:28am Aug 7 "NEXT ELECTION ma b tabdeeli mushkil ha"
ch.shujat k mutabiq PML(Q) or PPP na faisla kiya ha k wo mil kar election larein gy
ab dosri taraf jamat-e-islami , PTI , PML(N) or JUI aisi parties han jin ka vote bank nazriyati tor per similer ha , ab ho ga kiya ? ho ga ye k agar in 4 parties na samajh dari ka muzahira nahi kiya tu ye 4ron apas ma larein gy 1 dosry k vote kharab karein gy or nateejy ma punjab ma ppp and PML(Q) seats jeetny ma kamyab ho sakti han is liye meri nazar ma IMRAN KHAN ko PML(N) k liye thori space rakhni chahiye thi lakin ab aisa mumkin nahi ha is k ilawa zardari na pehly din se hi benazir income support fund se vote khareedny ka silsila shuroo kar rkha ha jis se log zardari k ghulam ban gay han or koi is per aitaraz b nahi kar sakta jo aitaraz kary ga wo ghareeb ki nazar ma bura bany ga lakin wo log jo benazir income support ki raqam ly rahy han wo ye b nahi janty k ap k 2000 k liye zardari mulk ka kitna nuqsan kar raha ha ye bechary gurbat k mary log phr PPP ko hi vote dein gy
kion 2000 dy kar zardari in logon per ahsan kar raha ha hala k zardari ka koi ahsan nahi ha
sindh ki jahan tak bat ha karachi or hydrabad tu ALTAF HUSSAIN k bap ki jageer ha in cities ma tu tabdeeli ki bat karna bhains k agy been bjany k braber ha or rahi bat androon sindh ki tu wahan tu imran khan smait koi leader jata hi nahi ha or na whan azadana siasat ki jaskti ha wahan tu bas wo karna parta ha jo wahan k wadairy chahty han androon sind ma sindh ma PML(functional) pir sahab pagara ki jo seats han wo koi 2sri party jeet hi nahi sakti ye tu ap sub b janty han k wahan tu peeri faqeeri per vote milta ha is ka bad un seats ki bat karty han jin per ppp kamyab howi ha un ma sa b beshtar seats aisi han jin per wadairy or jageer dar ya bary bary khandanon se tauluq rakhny waly log election jeety han un seats per log ya tu wadairon k hukum k paband han ya phir khandan k sarbarah k faislon k paband han tu ap khud sochein k hum tabdeeli ki umeed kahan se lagaein imran khan kahty han tabdeeli ki movement pehly cities se shuroo ho kar gaon tak phailti ha lakin yahan tu karachi , hydrabad , lahore , queta , peshawar jese cities b yarghamal bany howy han in ma b logon ko gumrah kiya howa ha tu tabdeeli kese ay gi ,
soba khaibar pakhtoon khuwa ki agar bat ki jay tu abi tak sorat-e-hal kuch wazeh nahi ha ka wahan k log akhir kis se umeed lagay baithy han wahan k halat is qabil nahi k siasi sargarmian azadi se ki jaein lakin ANP pakhtoon khuwa k name per vote leny ki koshish kary gi or usy kamyabi b mumkin ha kion MULANA fazlurahman na apny ap ko jan bojh kar itna ganda kiya ha ta k america ki marzi k mutabiq log ANP ko vote dein or abi tak mulana sab yehi kar rahy han
lakin in sub baton k bawajood PTI ko kuch kamyabi Khaibar pakhtoon khuwa se milny ki umeed ha
baloochistan ma halat is qabil nahi han k wahan azadana election ho sakein pichli bar ki tarhan is bar b baloochistan se wohi jamat jeety gi jis ko stablishment support kary gi
tabdeeli lany ka 1 tareeqa bacha ha wo ye k , meri nazar ma pakistan ki tabahi k zimy dar wo log han jo vote nahi dalty or gharon ma baithy rahty han T.V ya computer per hum sub PTI workers ko chahiye k facebook per logon ko agahi deny k sath sath pamflat print karwa kar is k zariye ghar ghar ja kar logon ko PTI ma shamoliat ki dawat dein or logon VOte ki taqat se agah karein logon ko bataein k vote ki kiya ahmiat ha or vote PTI ko kion dena zaroori ha apni Jamat k bary ma logon ko agah karein ta k wo 60 % log jo vote nahi dalty wo b vote dalny aein or ma yaqeen se kahta ho jab sub log vote karein gy tu hi tabdeeli ay gi warna agar yehi 40 % siasi workers hi vote dalty rahy tu kabi tabdeeli nai ay gi
thank u
khi pkView Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.
|
The Compromise of 1850 was a package of five bills, passed in September 1850, which defused a four-year confrontation between the slave states of the South and the free states of the North regarding the status of territories acquired during theMexican-American War (1846–1848). The compromise, drafted by Whig Henry Clayand brokered by Clay and Democrat Stephen Douglas, avoided secession or civil war and reduced sectional conflict for four years.
The Compromise was greeted with relief, although each side disliked specific provisions. Texas surrendered its claim to New Mexico but received debt relief and the Texas Panhandle, and retained the control over El Paso that it had established earlier in 1850. California was permitted to be admitted to the Union as a free state, instead of being split at the Missouri Compromise Line or parallel 35° north. In addition, the South avoided the[1] Wilmot Proviso. As compensation, the South received the possibility of slave states, an issue to be determined by popular sovereignty in the new New Mexico Territory and Utah Territory (these lands were generally unsuited to plantation agriculture and were populated by non-Southerners); a stronger Fugitive Slave Act, the enforcement of which outraged Northern public opinion; and preservation of slavery in the national capital, although the slave trade was banned there except in the portion of the District of Columbia that rejoined Virginia.
The Compromise became possible after the sudden death of President Zachary Taylor, who, although a slaveowner, had favored excluding slavery from the Southwest. Whig leader Henry Clay designed a compromise, which failed to pass in early 1850. Upon Clay's instruction, Democratic Senator Stephen Douglas (Illinois) then divided Clay's bill into several smaller pieces and narrowly won their passage over the opposition of those with stronger views on both sides, including SenatorJohn C. Calhoun of South Carolina.
Contents[hide] |
