Saturday, June 4, 2011

**JP** MUST READ COLUMN (ANDAZ-E-FIKR)

Dear All 

Kindly Click the Link for my latest Column 

http://www.zeeshannews.com/columns/tariq/andaz-e-fikr.htm  

Tariq Hussain Butt

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Betcha the MSM won't tell you this one

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/mcdonalds-jobs-us-creation/2011/06/03/id/398806?s=al&promo_code=C626-1

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

[Fwd: One to pass to your friends...]

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Garage owner in New Mexico





 
 
 




 

This  is the true story of a Garage Owner in New Mexico who gave his dog a haircut.                     
                    
He was sick and tired of thugs breaking into his garage shop to steal  tools, etc.  
So he  came up with this idea  to give his Woofter a haircut.  He put the word out that he had a new  
Mexican  Lion that would attack anyone that tried to break in or climb his fence.  
Would-be  thieves saw the "Lion" from a distance and fled the  scene.

 
 
cid:1.2949944287@web86507.mail.ird.yahoo.com


cid:2.2949944287@web86507.mail.ird.yahoo.com
                     
The dog's  probably trying to figure out why his head's so hot and his  butt's so cold .    

I'll  give you 5 minutes to stop laughing before you send it on to  others!!!!!!! 
 
   
 

 
 
!









 
 


 
 
 
 
 




--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: HBO’s 'Too Big to Fail' – A Reality Check

I find it interesting that you used the phrase "in truth and fact" twice in your response to MJ, but in one instance, "in truth and fact," you failed to provide any factual evidence to support your claims that Rockwell "is in favor of ObamaCare." or that "Lou (sic) doesn't have a clue what a 'Libertarian'  even is."

On 06/04/2011 03:38 AM, Keith In Köln wrote:


On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:01 PM, MJ <> wrote:

Rockwell is neither the author of the piece NOR does his name appear within it.
 
===
 
The article appears on LouRockwell.com,  where you cut and paste it from:
 
 
Michael goes on to say:
 
Additionally, the author says nothing regarding the Government Entities of Freddie and Fannie or whether Bush tried to modify their policies. The SAME goes with Clinton, CRA, etc.
 
<scratches head>

===

Exactly;  proving once again that the author hasn't a clue about what the Hell he is even talking about.   Both Rockwell and the author,  (Is the Author even American?)  ignores the real issue of the, "three year anniversary of the dramatic financial events of September 2008";  which was in truth and fact caused by the communist inspired Democratic initiative,  the Community Reinvestment Act.  Rockwell, Jens C. Kolbjørnsen (possibly a Swede?  I'd love to hear his views on Swedish politics!)  obviously don't want to discuss the real culprit, instead focuing and inferring blame on the wront entities.
 
 


Eugene Ludwig,  President Clinton's Comptroller of the Currency and head of the Office of the Comptroller and Currency, was a strong proponent of expanding the reach of Community Reinvestment Act.  Ludwig  said in his confirmation hearing that his first priority as Comptroller would be to eliminate 

 

"discrimination from our financial system, root and branch." 

 

Ludwig told bankers,

 

"If you seize this issue as an opportunity, you will reap the benefits in the form of new business and heightened respect from the press, the Congress, and your communities."  (See the CATO Institute, a non-partisan Libertarian Think-Tank, link provided below)

 

 With regard to the Community Reinvestment Act, Clinton Administration Attorney General Janet Reno said,

 

"No loan is exempt, no bank is immune. For those who thumb their nose at us, I promise vigorous enforcement."

 

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:90IT4MK9474J:www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv17n4/vmck4-94.pdf+Community+Reinvestment+Act&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us

 

 

Finally, Lou Rockwell, the purported "Libertarian"  that he is,  ignores former President Clinton's admission of guilt.  On September 26, 2008,  His Holiness said: 

 

"I think the responsibility that the Democrats have, may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress, or by me when I was president, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

 
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MELTDOWN_ADS?SITE=DCUSN&SECTION=POLITICS&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
 
Lou Rockwell.  A political hack, who parades himself as a "Libertarian".   A purported "Libertarian"  who is ignorant of our history,  our culture,  our system of government, macro or micro economics, and a purported "Libertarian" who is in favor of ObamaCare.  How......Oxymoronic.  In truth and fact, Lou doesn't have a clue what a "Libertarian"  even is.
 
 
 
 

 
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:30 PM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

Tennessee middle school assistant football coach, age 26, fired for a song he wrote and played!!!

Great song.  Has had over 2.7 million hits already.









If you kinda like Bluegrass and are a Conservative you will LOVE this song and the message it brings.

Tennessee middle school assistant football coach, age 26, fired for a song he wrote and played!!!

He'll make more money when this song becomes a big hit than he would teaching school.

When you go to the link for the song, there are a couple of sites that give the news on the firing.

This could be the next number one hit country song.

It's the best effort yet at encapsulating the outrage at the oversteps of this government in an entertaining song.

Apparently the guy was fired over the song because some parents complained.

Shameful if it´s true.

If you like it, help it go "viral" by passing it along to everyone you know.

Click Below for Great Song!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfH46DTAkxo

-- 
 
 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** Re: latest fatwa by lashkar e jangvi (balochistan unit)

POINTS OF CONSIDERATION
 
the jihad is always against infidel ,after releasing thier companions ,thn infidels will be converted or lashkar-e-jangvi will convert to shiasm.
Is it possible to play such kinda games at high level without will of establishment ?????
media representators are numb or pressed???
we always mourn after post incidents but never take action at pre indicators.


 
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:56 PM, huma fouladi <huma.fouladi@gmail.com> wrote:
pamphlet distributed/thrown in the houses of hazara community quetta.
 
 
 


--
Huma Fouladi
Executive Director
Rights Research & Development Foundation




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Miami Beach Police Ordered Videographer At Gunpoint To Hand Over Phone

The guy that was shot and killed was not a "good" guy, but this smells.


Miami Beach Police Ordered Videographer At Gunpoint To Hand Over Phone
But video survived even after police tried to destroy phone
By Carlos Miller
http://www.pixiq.com/article/MIami%20Beach%20Police%20Ordered%20Videographer%20At%20Gunpoint%20To%20Hand%20Over

Witnesses Said They Were Forced To Hide Video After Beach Shooting
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/02/v-fullstory/2248396/witnesses-said-they-were-forced.html

"Benoit filmed the incident from the sidewalk on the northeast corner of 13th Street and Collins Avenue, close enough to see some officers’ faces and individual muzzle flashes."

Miami Beach Police Say They Found Gun In Car Of Man They Killed
http://www.pixiq.com/article/miami-beach-police-say-they-found-gun-in-car-of-man-they-killed

"Miami Beach police say they found a gun in the car of the man they shot more than 100 times on Memorial Day - two-and-a-half days after the actual shooting.

"Chief Carlos Noriega said the gun was out of sight, which is why police did not find it until 7 p.m. Wednesday even though the shooting occurred at 4 a.m. Monday.

"Perhaps police will find spent shell casings by this weekend."
--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

Did Ex-CIA Man Have Bin Laden In His Sights 10 Times?

The Bin Laden Hunter: Ex-CIA Man Had Bin Laden In His Sights 10 Times
Terrorist hunter Michael Scheuer tells Duncan Gardham and Iain Hollingshead how he was repeatedly ordered not to stop the al-Qaeda chief.
21 May 2011

There are not many sane people who can say with confidence that, had a president of America only listened to them, they could have saved $1.3 trillion and many hundreds of thousands of lives. Michael Scheuer can.

During his 22 years in the CIA – three and a half as head of a 18-man Osama bin Laden unit – he told his bosses at Langley on 10 occasions that he had a clear opportunity to kill or capture the terrorist chief. On all 10 he was told to hold his fire.

To look at Scheuer, 59, bespectacled, bearded and apparently every inch the academic and author he has become, you would not guess at his espionage past. The unit he led between 1995 and 1999 was codenamed Alec station, after his son, but it was nicknamed the “Manson family”, after the criminal Charles Manson, for the zeal with which it approached its task.

That we know anything at all about Scheuer’s past as a terrorist hunter is down to him. Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terrorism, which was published anonymously in 2004, the same year as he left the CIA, had the dubious honour of being praised for its insight in a speech by bin Laden. He was later unmasked as the author and has written three further books under his own name, the latest a biography of the man he spent much of his life trying to capture.

At a time when half the world has become an armchair expert on the world’s previously most wanted man, Scheuer is very much the real deal.

It is a story that began back in the 1980s when he was a junior member of a CIA programme funding Afghan mujahideen against the Soviets. In those days bin Laden was known to the CIA as a “do-gooder” – one who spent his own money while acting as a “bag man”, providing funds from private individuals in the Middle East. But he eventually became something of a “combat engineer”, using his family’s wealth to build barracks, clinics and roads for fighters.

By 1986 bin Laden had emerged from the shadow of more senior figures in the mujahideen to lead his own unit of young Arabs from a hideout known as the “Lion’s Den”. “We were aware of him but he absolutely refused to talk to us because he had his own money and guns and everything he needed,” says Scheuer. “We would have liked to talk to anyone fighting the Russians but he never gave us any indication that he wanted to talk. We never had contact with him.” The CIA was also aware of his growing antipathy towards the US. “He was already saying things like, 'First the Soviets but ultimately the Americans are just as bad’ .”

Following the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan in 1989, bin Laden returned home to Saudi Arabia a hero. However, he was placed under house arrest by the Saudi government after speaking out against the American troops stationed in Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf war. A deal was brokered by his influential family who persuaded the authorities to return his passport, allowing him to live in exile in Sudan.

Scheuer, meanwhile, had returned from Afghanistan to the CIA Counter-Terrorism Centre at Langley, where he began analysing warring factions of Algerians, rebellious Egyptians, and a group calling itself “al-Kaidah”. It wasn’t long before bin Laden’s name cropped up again. Scheuer “didn’t know if he was hands on operationally or just another Saudi spendthrift”. The answer soon became clear. In November 1995 Scheuer was appointed to set up the bin Laden chasing unit. After digging deeper he realised that al-Qaeda was “unlike any other terrorist organisation”.

Bin Laden was by now running a soap-making factory and tannery in Khartoum, an agricultural business in eastern Sudan, and had been building a road from Khartoum to Port Sudan. Scheuer thought them all easy targets for sabotage. “We formulated operations and submitted them for approval but they would not approve any of them,” he says. “If we had been able to deal a serious economic blow it could have been a show-stopper.”

In 1996 bin Laden issued his own show-stopper: a fatwa on the US. In 1997 he moved to Tarnak, near Kandahar, living on a farm not unlike the compound in Pakistan where he was eventually found 14 years later.

It was a perfect spot for Scheuer’s men to launch a surveillance operation.

They built a unit of Afghan agents, codenamed “Trodpint”, which began to rehearse capturing bin Laden. They had two clear opportunities in the first half of 1998, but senior CIA officers were not convinced they were up to the job.

In August 1998 al-Qaeda killed 12 Americans and 200 others in bombings at two American embassies in east Africa. President Clinton ordered the CIA to dismantle al-Qaeda and, in Scheuer’s words, “take care” of bin Laden. The Pentagon launched cruise missile attacks on bin Laden’s training camps, but he had left the compound hours earlier. Scheuer estimates they had at least eight further opportunities to assassinate bin Laden in the following months.

“I’m not saying it would have been simple to take care of the problem, but it got progressively harder when we didn’t take those opportunities. One 50 cent round could have put us all out of our agony.”

In June 1999, he sent off an angry memo to senior officers asking why his men were risking their lives on someone America apparently had no interest in stopping. “I don’t know what you are doing when you talk to the President but he will not get a better opportunity than this,” he told them.

Scheuer was dismissed from his job and spent the next two years running counter-heroin operations in Pakistan and the Middle East. On September 11, 2001, he was back at CIA headquarters in Langley.

Arriving home exhausted at 11.30pm, he took a shower and crawled into bed when his phone went. It was his successor at the bin Laden unit. “We need you back,” he said.

Three months later British and American special forces were at Tora Bora, bin Laden’s heavily defended cave complex in Afghanistan, when they heard his voice over a captured radio.

It was the last time they had a fix on him for nine years. The Afghans let bin Laden walk out of Tora Bora and head for Pakistan during a ceasefire.

Scheuer continued to act as an adviser to the bin Laden unit until 2004 when he resigned in disgust at the way in which the public was being lied to over the opportunities to capture the terrorist leader.

His books have pointed out the many failings of American policy in the Middle East, not least their inability to address the other causes of western unpopularity in the region while portraying a myopic image of bin Laden as a lunatic.

He retains a sneaking regard for the quarry he hunted in vain for so long. “I respect his piety, integrity and skills,” he says. And the next generation of al-Qaeda? “They will be even more cruel and bloody-minded.”

http://tinyurl.com/3h6clxb
--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

Miami Beach Police Ordered Videographer At Gunpoint To Hand Over Phone

The guy that was shot and killed was not a "good" guy, but this smells.


Miami Beach Police Ordered Videographer At Gunpoint To Hand Over Phone
But video survived even after police tried to destroy phone
By Carlos Miller
http://www.pixiq.com/article/MIami%20Beach%20Police%20Ordered%20Videographer%20At%20Gunpoint%20To%20Hand%20Over

Witnesses Said They Were Forced To Hide Video After Beach Shooting
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/02/v-fullstory/2248396/witnesses-said-they-were-forced.html

"Benoit filmed the incident from the sidewalk on the northeast corner of 13th Street and Collins Avenue, close enough to see some officers’ faces and individual muzzle flashes."

Miami Beach Police Say They Found Gun In Car Of Man They Killed
http://www.pixiq.com/article/miami-beach-police-say-they-found-gun-in-car-of-man-they-killed

"Miami Beach police say they found a gun in the car of the man they shot more than 100 times on Memorial Day - two-and-a-half days after the actual shooting.

"Chief Carlos Noriega said the gun was out of sight, which is why police did not find it until 7 p.m. Wednesday even though the shooting occurred at 4 a.m. Monday.

"Perhaps police will find spent shell casings by this weekend."
--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

Fox News turned on Palin









June 2, 2011

Fox News turned on Palin

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/36487

To be fair, a number of people who read this story on C4P came to the defense of FOX in part. They cited Hannity and Greta, Judge Jeanine and Judge Neapolitano as still favourably inclined. On the other hand Smith and others have now taken to calling her Contributor Palin rather than Gov Palin. You decide. Ted Belman

With Friends Like Fox News Palin Is Better Off With Her Enemies
by: Sheya

Recently we had a series of discussions with someone familiar with the inside dealings of Fox News regarding the way Fox News treats Governor Palin. While I don't condone using anonymous sources (I usually make fun of those citing anonymous sources) unfortunately we can't not reveal the source. So we have therefore gathered the evidence that will back up everything we were told and it's up to the reader to come to his or her own conclusion. Whichever way you look at it, the evidence is astonishing on how Fox News is out to sabotage Governor Palin.


When Roger Ailes hired Governor Palin, he thought he was hiring a puppet. He thought that he would groom her, train her, educate her and prop her up to become his candidate for president and that he would be able to pull her strings. Sort of being to Sarah Palin what George Soros is to Barack Obama.

It didn't take him long to find out that Governor Palin comes with no strings attached. No one tells her what to do, no one dictates to her, and no one controls her. Unlike the current occupant of the Oval Office, Governor Palin has a mind of her own.

In March 2010, when Governor Palin did Real American Stories, Fox News botched it up by using an interview with LL Cool J without asking him. They eventually took it out but it became an international controversy which took away from the effect of the show and hurt the Governor. Governor Palin didn't take it sitting down and she confronted Fox about the debacle. Ailes didn't take it lightly.

When Bill O'Reilly kept interrupting her interviews and finally Governor Palin confronted him on television, Bill's ego was hurt and he didn't like it. Governor Palin warned O'Reilly to behave or else.

In an article in the New York Mag Gabriel Sherman writes about Roger Ailes:

"He thinks things are going in a bad direction," another Republican close to Ailes told me. "Roger is worried about the future of the country. He thinks the election of Obama is a disaster. He thinks Palin is an idiot. He thinks she's stupid. He helped boost her up. People like Sarah Palin haven't elevated the conservative movement."

Fox of course stonewalled and came out and sort of denied it. The truth is that both are right. Ailes does not think Governor Palin is an idiot, far from it. He thinks Palin is shrewd. Though, as Sherman points out that "Fox's PR department is notoriously strict when it comes to internal leaks," Fox deliberately had that leaked in an attempt to kick Governor Palin in the shins. Ailes does believe that he helped boost her up and that she owes him her fame. He also believes that Palin is hurting the Fox brand.

It has been reported that before Governor Palin made the video in response to being accused of murder, she called Roger Ailes and asked for his advice. Governor Palin called a number of people and the advice was split; some told her to ignore it, others advised her that it would do her good to respond. Everyone she spoke to was well aware that she was simply reaching out to hear opinions and their advice was non-committal. Roger Ailes advised her to "lie low, there's no need to inject yourself into the story"

After examining her options, Governor Palin decided to do the video. Ailes was disappointed that she didn't take his advice. But why?

In an interview with Russell Simmons that was posted on the website, globalgrind.com, Ailes said in relation to the Arizona shooting that "I told all of our guys, shut up, tone it down, make your argument intellectually. You don't have to do it with bombast. I hope the other side does that." To protect the Fox brand, Ailes also wanted the network to distance itself from Palin who was the number one target of the left. Ailes feared that by Governor Palin's association to the network, which was also somewhat targeted, Fox would be pulled into it even deeper.

It was at that point when Fox decided to throw Governor Palin under the bus. Ailes' advice to Governor Palin had nothing to do with protecting her; it was all about protecting the Fox brand. Governor Palin realized that she was on her own and even those who she thought she could count on to defend her were about to stab her in the back. It was from that point onwards that Fox's attitude towards Palin changed and in the following days every pundit on the network went from "Palin needs to respond" just a day before her video was released, to "Palin should have shut up" the next day.  The day before the video was released Bill O'Reilly complained that he invited Palin on his show to respond, which he thought was important for her to do, but the next day argued she should have ignored it.

That was the turning point for Ailes where he decided that Governor Palin is not his candidate and that he'll do whatever he can to make sure she isn't. Ailes needed someone he could control and Governor Palin clearly wasn't that person. Sometime in recent months the word went out internally that reporters, anchors and contributors should push the narrative that Palin isn't running as hard they can. No matter what Palin says or does or what the polls say, the rule is simple "Palin isn't running and everything she does is either for fun or for money".

At the time of this posting we have mixed reports and cannot confirm whether the message came down as "this is the way we're doing it" or if it came in by way of leading the staff to believe that management has information that Governor Palin was in fact not running. The difference comes down to whether the show hosts are being misled or are playing along.

Simultaneously, all the show hosts went from Governor Palin being a first tier candidate to Palin is not running. Chris Wallace went from Palin is a serious contender, to Palin isn't running,  Fox and Friends hosts went from being very much supportive of Palin to Palin isn't running. Only this week on Tuesday did Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson and Brian Kilmeade discuss wehther Palin's one nation bus tour was a sign that Governor Palin is running for president. Wednesday, Doocy said, "is she running, probably not." Carlson appeared to be biting her tongue. It appeared they got the memo a little late. If by accident some contributor or host does suggest she may be running they quickly, turn it to "but she has no shot at winning"

At the time of writing this post the following appeared on the Fox News home page as the line of the night:

Fox went into high gear hyping Michele Bachmann. Not that Ailes thinks much of Bachmann (some suggest because Fox didn't want to appear sexist, hyping another female candidate gives them cover), but it was to push a narrative that Palin is stepping on Bachmann's toes.  Never mind that Governor Palin was a potential candidate for nearly three years and the only reason Bachmann got in was because she saw an opening after the Arizona shooting. Ironically at the same time Ailes decided to throw Palin under the bus.

The facts speak for themselves. In my research for this article I was astonished at the level Fox stooped to diminish Palin. While this has been going on for weeks, this post can only be so long, the following examples are from the past seven days or so alone:

• When other politicians only jokingly say that they are thinking about running for president like they think about other stuff, Fox immediately runs with that person being a serious potential candidate. However when Palin does things that had any other candidate have done the exact same things Fox would have reported it as them seriously considering a run, with Palin it's covered as her just building her brand.

• Usually when Fox does segments they try to keep it fair and balanced. They'll usually bring on two people one from each side of the argument. Lately on segments related to Palin they'll bring on one democrat who'll claim Palin isn't running and is doing it for money, while the republican or "supposedly" Palin defender will just agree with what the democrat said or slightly spin  it in a different direction such as saying that Palin isn't running and she's playing for king maker role. Conservatives4Palin has reached out to Fox and offered to go on the network to defend and talk about the Governors record to balance those segments. While the person we spoke to was originally enthusiastic about the idea, Fox suddenly stopped responding to emails.

• On May 26 Gallup released a poll showing Palin effectively tied with Romney, while Fox displayed the poll on screen, during the segment Palin's name didn't even come up once, not even by accident. While all the other potential and non-potential candidates, even the completely irrelevant ones, were discussed at length.

• This week during Palin's bus tour Fox had not on a single contributor who even remotely suggested that Palin may be running while even those who regularly defended Palin were beginning to take cheap shots at the Governor.

• The Bus tour itself was embargoed till Thursday (May 26th) 3pm but it was Fox news's Carl Cameron who broke the embargo at noon.

• Bill O'Reilly had multiple segments this week discussing Governor Palin, he didn't find it necessary to bring in even one person that would even remotely suggest that Palin may even be considering a run. He let Dick Morris get away with claiming that Palin has ADD, and allowed Charles Krauthammer, whose frame of reference about Palin is weak, go on and talk about a topic he knows nothing about.

• On Monday May 31st Fox news Special Report did a Bachmann vs palin poll and even though Palin led 71-28 Fox reported it that Bachmann was leading 55 to 45 the following snapshot was taken within 10 minutes of the results being announced.

• Every time Governor Palin does an interview on Fox, she'll talk policy for 15 minutes and just at the end the host will ask some dumb question related to some controversial issue and that is the headline Fox will be running with, ignoring her substance and run with the trivia. Fox practically forced Governor Palin to come on to talk about the controversy surrounding the White House inviting the rapper common to the poetry ceremony. Something they would never have asked another potential presidential candidate to do.

• Fox has also been giving quite a bit of attention to the hit piece book by disgruntled Palin aid Frank Bailey. The book was mentioned on multiple segments on various shows.  Bailey appeared on the Hannity show where he was excoriated by Sean Hannity, but he also appeared on Alan Colmes' radio show. Colmes was sympathetic to Bailey. It was the Colmes interview that made it to the Fox website soon after it aired while the Hannity interview was posted 24 hours later.

And this is how the Fox Nation ran with the Bailey story. While generally supportive of Governor Palin, it leads with this rather damning paragraph:

A former member of Sarah Palin's inner circle has written a scathing tell-all, saying Palin was ready to quit as governor months before she actually resigned and was eager to leave office when more lucrative opportunities came around.

Now for the revelation: Fox wants Palin out but they don't want to suspend her contract because by doing so they'll be conceding that she's a serious contender. Fox won't do anything that would lend her credibility. They just want her to resign. The tactic now is to make Palin's life as difficult and as miserable as possible until Palin just gets frustrated and leaves on her own citing irreconcilable differences. Things are going to get worse. Fox is about to up the ante and it's going to get ugly.

While the entire Fox cast, reporters and contributors alike, have all teamed up, by leading or being misled, to sabotage Governor Palin, the Governor does have two friends at the network: Sean Hannity and Greta van Susteren. They still defend her and take her seriously. It is for this reason that while Fox is increasingly reducing Governor Palin's appearances on the network, the Governor is mostly only doing interviews with Hannity and Greta.

Yesterday Governor Palin met with her bosses at Fox News. While we are not aware of what went on in that meeting and what if anything came of it, in a statement executive vice president of programming Bill Shine said "Right now there is no change in her status with FOX News." Ben Smith makes an interestingobservation:

The "right now" didn't appear in earlier statements.

Hopefully Ben is on to something and the "right now" is short lived. Governor Palin doesn't need this crap, it's time for her to leave Fox News so she can freely do what she wants to do, that is talk to other networks who, even though they trash her all day, at least they take her as a serious threat and presidential contender.

Posted by Ted Belman @ 10:16 pm | 18 Comments »



 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Congratulations, We Have Been Set Up For A Royal Screwing.




Congratulations, We Have Been Set Up For A Royal Screwing.

Off With Their Heads

 

  • Umm, This is a Berry Berry bad idea..  Steve

Imagine you live in a Red State. Tennessee is a good example. We can call Tennessee a "dead red cat state." The voters of Tennessee would vote for a dead red cat before they would vote for Obama. Yet, all of Tennessee's votes could go to Barack Obama.

Voter fraud? No something much worse.

The worse is a proposal gathering steam, sponsored by some Republicans called the National Popular Vote. The National Popular Vote is a stealth way to repeal the Electoral College that our founding fathers gave us.

As most people probably know, every four years in November, we go to the polls but we do not vote for President. Instead we vote for the electors that go to the meeting of the Electoral College and that is the official vote for President. Since the electors are committed to a particular candidate, the end result is never a surprise.

Under the NPV, the states sign an agreement that says whichever candidate gets the most votes nationally, gets the electoral votes from that state. For example, you could live in Tennessee, where 60% of the population is going to vote for a Republican. Even Mitt Romney could carry 60% in Tennessee. Yet if Barack Obama has more votes nationally, all of Tennessee's 11 electoral votes would go to Barack Obama.

Under the NPV a candidate does not even have to take a majority of the popular vote, only be the largest vote getter.

When the founding fathers established the Electoral College, they set up a brilliant system. The Electoral College requires that candidates have a broad appeal. Candidates cannot simply restrict their campaign to a few densely populated areas and ignore the rest of the country. Even small states play a crucial role in the elections when we have the Electoral College. Many of those who push the NPV point to the 2000 election, which is one of three times in our country's history where a candidate won more popular votes but lost the Electoral College. Had Al Gore paid attention to his alleged home state of Tennessee, he would have become the 43rd President. Had he won Tennessee, Florida's votes would not have mattered.

When you eliminate the Electoral College you basically wipe out the state lines. This is nothing less than an assault on federalism. Eliminating the Electoral College changes the American states from state to more like administrative departments of the national government.

Technically, this is not abolishing the Electoral College. It is simply gaming the results.

Currently, the NPV has passed in eight states.

When you are undecided about an idea, you can often gauge its merit by looking who supports it. The National Popular Vote is endorsed by a multitude of liberal newspapers. If liberals think something is a good idea, it probably is not. The Advisory Board consists of liberal Democrats and moderate Republicans. There is not a single conservative on that list.

The National Popular vote is tailor made for a billionaire to run a campaign in a few large metropolitan areas, collecting a plurality of the vote and is suddenly President. This is not a popular vote as it could allow a candidate with support in only two or three small but densely populated areas to run and win. They can pander to New York corridor, Los Angeles/San Francisco area and Chicago, pretty much ignore rest of the country. The left likes to call the heartland of America, "fly over country." If the National Popular Vote becomes law, fly over country will not just be that. It will be irrelevant to the politics of choosing an American President. Most of the Red States of America will not be part of a Republic. We will simply be ruled.

~Steve~        Formally from The USA.

http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topics/congratulations-your-vote-just

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Minnesota: Koran-pushing Muslim woman stabs 2 outside library (video)




Minnesota: Koran-pushing Muslim woman stabs 2 outside library (video)

Hat tip Vlad Tepes for the video via Police: Woman Stabs 2 Outside Bloomington Library « CBS Minnesota. BLOOMINGTON, Minn. (WCCO) — Two people were stabbed in a seemingly random attack at a Twin Cities library. After the incident Wednesday night at the Oxboro Library in Bloomington, 35-year-old Samira Abdalla Salim was arrested. Salim was [...]

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Gary Johnson Excluded From NH Debate

Anyone who thinks the political process in this country is not rigged is blind.


Gary Johnson Excluded From NH Debate
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/gary-johnson-excluded-from-nh-debate

"CNN, WMUR, and the New Hampshire Union Leader will host a presidential debate on Monday, June 13th in Manchester. Republican presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Tim Pawlenty, Herman Cain, and Ron Paul will participate. In addition, unannounced candidates Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum will also take part.

"Gary Johnson, however, will not participate. Why? Because he wasn’t invited."
--

Freedom is always illegal!

When we ask for freedom, we have already failed. It is only when we declare freedom for ourselves and refuse to accept any less, that we have any possibility of being free.

Let's Finally Dispense With 'Hero' Nonsense


Let's Finally Dispense With 'Hero' Nonsense
by Steven Greenhut

Not only did Alameda firefighters and police stand around, watch and do nothing as a suicidal man, Raymond Zack, spent an hour in the San Francisco Bay, neck deep in water, they didn't even go into the water to retrieve his lifeless body after he died. They left that work to a bystander. To make this incident even more infuriating, police and fire officials defended the inactions of their employees and blamed budget cuts and city policy for this inhumane behavior by those who often claim to be selfless protectors of the public.

At least we can dispense with all the hero nonsense from public safety "first responders" who use the hero card whenever they are negotiating for higher pay, better pensions and other bigger budget items. When it comes time to actually act like heroes, they often act like bureaucrats. Certainly, as a deadly fire in San Francisco Thursday that claimed the life of at least one firefighter shows, these jobs can be dangerous (although they don't come near the top of the most-dangerous-jobs list). But the Alameda tragedy is an increasingly common situation as officials put their own safety, comfort and bureaucratic priorities above everything else.

Per the MSNBC report: "Interim Alameda Fire Chief Mike D'Orazi said that due to 2009 budget cuts his crews did not have the training or cold-water gear to go into the water. 'The incident yesterday was deeply regrettable,' he said Tuesday. 'But I can also see it from our firefighters' perspective. They're standing there wanting to do something, but they are handcuffed by policy at that point.'"

For God's sake, blaming budget cuts is reprehensible especially given the large chunk of local budgets that firefighting services consume. Simple decency required some effort – rather than standing around and gawking by these highly paid professionals – to save a troubled man. The bystander who fished out his body didn't have cold-water gear (let alone a big pension from the fire department), but she jumped into the water any way and acted like an actual human being. The water was a bit chilly (54 degrees) but it's not Alaska.

The article quoted a local resident who made the sensible point: "This just strikes me as not just a problem with funding, but a problem with the culture of what's going on in our city, that no one would take the time and help this drowning man." And it's a huge cultural problem within any firefighting department that would put budgetary complaints and red tape above doing their basic human mission of saving someone in harm's way.

The Alameda police showed even deeper bureaucratic inhumanity. "Certainly this was tragic, but police officers are tasked with ensuring public safety, including the safety of personnel who are sent to try to resolve these kinds of situations," Alameda police Lt. Sean Lynch told the San Jose Mercury News. "He was engaged in a deliberate act of taking his own life. We did not know whether he was violent, whether drugs were involved. It's not a situation of a typical rescue."

This response is typical from police agencies. First they say that officer safety is their first priority. Then they blame the victim. Well, if you're not going to do your job and endure even an iota of risk, then let's stop playing up the risks to officers. And helping suicidal people and troubled people of all sort is part of the job of a police officer, one would think. No one, of course, will be held accountable for any of this, which is how it works in the public sector, and especially with public safety agencies.

The whole scene sounded like something from the Three Stooges, except with tragic results. According to the MSNBC report, "The Coast Guard was called to the scene, but the water was too shallow for its boat. A Coast Guard helicopter arrived more than an hour later because it had been on another call and had to refuel."

When asked if he would save a drowning child in such waters, Alameda Fire Chief Ricci Zombeck offered this bureaucratic and maddening answer to an ABC news reporter "Well, if I was off duty I would know what I would do, but I think you're asking me my on-duty response and I would have to stay within our policies and procedures because that's what's required by our department to do."

Obviously, then, we are safer without these departments. A heroic bystander might at least jump in the water and try to save your kid while the professional, well-paid, highly pensioned "hero" is forbidden by policy (and a bureaucratic attitude) to do so.

The firefighters, cops and Coast Guard, with all their personnel and top-of-the-line equipment, were incapable of even trying to save the life of a man who stood neck deep in water for an hour. Something definitely is wrong with this picture. It reminds me of another incident in Philadelphia I wrote about for LewRockwell.com a few years ago:

"In a videotaped 'rescue' along the Schuylkill River last May [police and firefighters] did nothing other than watch for a half-hour or so as a troubled man clung to the side of a bridge, then jumped off and drowned. … [T]hey were joking around as the tragic event transpired. It took a roller-blading passerby and another bystander to attempt a rescue. … And the officials wouldn't touch [the dying man] or try to resuscitate him until the rubber gloves and other safety equipment was on the scene. They left the dirty work for the brave volunteers. This infuriating response didn't merit a rebuke from the police commissioner, who actually praised the assembled cops for their efforts after a public outcry ensued."

Instead of getting punished, Alameda officials will get rewarded – with additional training dollars. But who really believes that even if that money had been available and the policy been different that these first responders would have done the right thing? The local resident was right. The problem is a deep cultural one, something I see to be endemic in the government agencies that always claim to protect and serve us.

Police and fire agencies are bureaucracies and, as such, they end up functioning in a similar manner to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the IRS and any other alphabet soup agency you can name. As writer Thomas Sowell put it, "You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing."

And so normal people stand around wondering how we can end up with such a bad outcome – a needless death – while the bureaucracies, stuck as they are on procedure, tell us they acted appropriately.

It's about time the public starts rethinking our public safety policy and starts wondering whether the creation of big costly bureaucracies, encumbered by ridiculous rules and designed mainly around the convenience and safety of those working in the agencies, is the best way to protect the public's safety.


http://lewrockwell.com/greenhut/greenhut65.1.html