--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Feb 2, 10:47 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> State-Owned Churches are Killing AmericaBy Chuck Baldwin
> February 3, 2011
> NewsWithViews.com
> America was birthed in the spirit of liberty and baptized in the blood of patriots and tyrants. Leading the charge in America's fight for independence was a courageous group of patriot-preachers that came to be known as the "Black Regiment." I have written several columns on this subject. Suffice it to say here that I invite readers to take a look at my Black Regiment web page to learn more about this early American phenomenon. There is little doubt that without these stalwart Christian pastors, this country would not have come into existence. (I extended this call for a modern-day Black Regiment 5 years before Glenn Beck ever mentioned it.)
> See myBlack Regiment page here.
> Plus, to read my column regarding the Black Regiment that was published in The New American magazine in 2009,click here.
> So, what did these colonial preachers have that today's preachers don't? The better question might be: what did these colonial preachers NOT have that today's preachers do? The answer? Two things: 1) an IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation status, and 2) a 50-year misinterpretation of Romans chapter 13.
> The now infamous 501(c)(3) section of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) goes back to 1936 (the seeds of this Venus Fly Trap date back to 1872). But then-Senator Lyndon Johnson was the Dr. Frankenstein who, in 1954, unleashed this monster upon America. His motivation was: he did not like the way pastors and churches were opposing his liberal agenda, and he wanted to use the power of law to silence them. He, therefore, introduced verbiage to the IRC that churches were prohibited from influencing political legislation and supporting political campaigns, or risk losing their tax-exempt status.
> Of course, colonial pastors didn't have to worry about their churches being "incorporated" as State-created (and controlled) entities, or about IRS agents intimidating them regarding what they could or could not say. In early America, preachers were free men; they could say whatever they darned well pleased. Gasp! Beyond that, virtually everyone regarded preachers as being "God's men," not the "servants of men."
> Today, however, the average pastor has become the servant of the State and the church he pastors, more often than not, has become a creature of the State. It is an absolute fact that State-owned churches are killing America!
> Dick Greb of the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship in Westminster, Maryland, wrote: "Many Americans find it disturbing that some of our churches today are little more than milquetoast corporations that fear our federal government more than the great I AM. Moreover, it can even be said that some preachers have the appearance of cringing, 'politically correct' cowards, rather than committed Godly men of fortitude with backbone, such as those we read of in the Bible." (Source: Greb, Dick. "The 501(c)(3) Hallucination: A Bane to Liberty." Reasonable Action Issue #244 Winter 2003.)
> Dear reader, you can take this to the bank: the vast majority of pastors and board members of these 501(c)(3) corporations, when push comes to shove (and it always does), will demonstrate unconditional loyalty to the State. Plus, they will compromise or sacrifice any and every Bible doctrine or principle in order to preserve their tax-exempt status and stay on the smiley side of the IRC. They will also throw anyone under the old proverbial bus who might risk them falling out of favor with the IRS. (I can give painful and personal testimony to that fact!) Greb is right! Many, or most, of today's pastors and church officers fear the federal government far more than they fear God.
> Not only did colonial preachers not have to contend with putting their churches under some State-controlled corporation, they would never have allowed it to happen! Can one imagine John Leland, Jonas Clark, or John Witherspoon being told by any State official what he could or could not say, or what his church could or could not do? What a joke! These men were willing to go to prison or even the grave in order to remain faithful to their spiritual calling and to their political and moral convictions!
> The other thing that colonial preachers did not suffer from was a 50-year indoctrination of a misinterpretation of Romans 13.
> This "Submit-to-the-government-no-matter-what" doctrine (using Romans 13 as the pretext) is a satanically inspired lie designed to turn free men and women into slaves of the state! Students of history know that Adolf Hitler encouraged German pastors and churches to promote this same fallacious philosophy among the German people. Gee! I wonder why? And according to Erwin Lutzer's book, "Hitler's Cross" (must reading, I might add), out of the more than 14,000 evangelical churches and pastors in Germany at the time, only about 800 remained faithful to Scripture and opposed Hitler's brand of state worship. If my math is correct, that's about 5%. And it would not surprise me if 5% is about the percentage of pastors and churches in America today that are opposing this modern-day worship of the state.
> At this point, instead of embellishing upon Romans 13, I am going to insert a commercial. I began a series of messages on Romans 13 last Sunday at Liberty Fellowship in Kalispell, Montana. In fact, by the time you read this, Part 1 of my message on Romans 13 will be available online.
> To view my message, "The Truth About Romans 13, Part 1,"click here.
> I will continue my series on Romans 13 this Sunday, February 6, 2011. I invite readers to watch this address live on the Internet. Viewthis livestreaming broadcast, here.
> "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." So said Edmund Burke. And, unfortunately, the good men that are mostly doing nothing and allowing evil to triumph in our land are the good men (and women) of America's churches who have either been intimidated by the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation status, or who have been put into a sheepish, servile, Satan-induced coma from an overdose of misapplied Romans 13 poison.
> To quote the famous Bible commentator, Matthew Henry, "It is the devil that stirs up his instruments, wicked men [in government or without], to persecute the people of God; tyrants and persecutors are the devil's tools, though they gratify their own sinful malignity, and know not that they are actuated by a diabolical malice." (Source: Matthew Henry's Commentaries on the Bible, notes on Revelation 2:10)
> Yes, the Black Regiment preachers of colonial America helped lead America's fight for freedom and independence. But, they did not have their hands out to the IRS, or their minds and hearts numbed into apathy and indifference by decades of misuse and abuse of Romans chapter 13.
> P.S. My son, Timothy Baldwin, who is a historian, author, and constitutional attorney, is in the process of publishing a new book entitled, "Romans 13, The True Meaning of Submission." I have read it. In the similitude of Tim's first book, "Freedom For A Change," this book is an absolutely brilliant and scholarly presentation of the true meaning of Romans 13. Watch my web site, or Tim's web site, for information regarding this new book's release.
> Myweb site.
> Tim'sweb site.
> And, if you have not yet ordered Tim's book, "Freedom For A Change," I enthusiastically recommend it to you.Order it here.*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order.Use this link.http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin635.htm
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
their countries ... their problems
fund your own charities
On Feb 2, 10:50 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Losing EgyptbyThe Freemanon Wednesday, February 2, 2011 at 12:01am
> Egyptians have taken to the streets to demand the ouster of President Hosni Mubarak, the U.S.-backed leader who came to power after the assassination of Anwar Sadat nearly 30 years ago. We can be sure that sooner or later someone will condemn Barack Obama as the president wholost Egypt.Such mutterings, in my view, would border on delusion. The world is not a chessboard on which the U.S. government can move the world s people around, expecting them to obey. And yet the illusion continues.
> After generations of backing dictators who flout their people s interests, the obvious question is, Why do American political leaders repeatedly follow the same path even though such actions fit Einstein s definition of insanity : doing the same thing over and over expecting different results?
> My answer is that for more than a century, Americans have been inundated with the Religion of Progressivism, which is based on a belief that governments hold the keys to happiness and prosperity, and that Really Wise People with theproper educational and professional credentialsare the Keepers of the Secret. The Progressives of a century ago held that commerce without the guiding hand of the wise State ultimately debases all of life, and that the economy should serve the greater interests of America. This was naturally extended to foreign affairs.
> Today, modern American institutions, from corporations to education to churches, use such beliefs as core organizing principles, and both liberals and conservatives fully have embraced this secular faith. The policy elite sees the United States as a singular organic interest and believes the interests of everyone else on earth need to be brought into line with the American agenda.Bribery and ForceMany Americans seem to think that the arrangement pushed on the rest of the world must be kept together by a combination of bribery and sheer force. American troops are stationed all over the globe and presently are fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, neither of which is going very well. (And no one should be surprised that occupied people fight back.)
> For more than three decades, the United States has used bribery with Egypt. (It is the second largest recipient of U.S. aid, behind Israel.) Such aid has not only propped up Mubarak s government, but it also has relieved it of the need to liberalize the economy because no matter how much wealth it wastes, the United States is there with its big checkbook.
> We shouldn t be surprised that the individuals at the top of Egypt s governing structure are the main beneficiaries of this bribery, while ordinary people are forced to live in poverty. Mubarak sinterventionist economyhas made some moves toward liberalization in recent years, but it has a long way to go to being free and fully market-oriented. The people protesting in the streets understand that U.S. financial aid props up the corruption and oppression.
> No, they don t hate us for our freedoms. They hate a U.S. policy that, in the name of stability, works against freedom. This is where Progressivism has led.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
sorry
On Feb 3, 9:41 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Predator Drone Patrols US Border + Obama s JokePosted byMichael S. Rozeffon February 3, 2011 08:36 AM
> Like a sci-fi movie come true, the U.S. is nowpatrolling its Canadian borderwith the Predator Drone. Texas has also used drones. I foresee the lockdown of larger regions of America some day, just as these simply awful lockdowns are occurring on a daily basis at schools and other places. The transition to endless monitoring with the threat of punishing violence is a real threat to privacy. I see already an utterly dreadful ending coming to privacy, and human beings cannot function properly as human beings without privacy. While the servile press constantly says that the CIA operates the killing drones in Central Asia covertly , Obama jokes about them in this video:Obama Jokes About Killing Jonas Brothers With Predator Drones
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On 02/02/2011 09:56 PM, studio wrote:
> Personally speaking, the American people should do to Wall Street what
> the Egyptians are doing to their dictator.
>
> Now would you disagree with that?
>
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Now would you disagree with that?
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Mubarak will probably suffer a military coup soon and either be hanged
or flee in exile to somewhere.... and it better not be the US.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
From what I can tell, that seems to be a correct assessment.
I notice the neo-cons not saying much about it either.
Unfortunately, because of these kind of tactics, Mubarak will probably
wind up being hanged soon and the US suffer the consequences of the
underhanded support of the regime, while telling the US citizens we
supported the citizens of Egypt the whole time.
What dirty no good rats we have for politicians in both parties now
days.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 | What You Need To Know About Sharia Law |
Sharia For Dummies. There may be some of you out there reading this article who have heard the term "sharia" but don't really know what it is. So we present to you 34 actual points of Sharia law to give you an idea what it would be live to live under it. Then you can [...]
 | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
Let's Tear Apart Newt Gingrich's Gay Marriage Logic!
2/2/11 at 12:50 PM Comment 26Comment 26Comments
In some ways, the debate hosted by George Washington University last
night between Howard Dean and Newt Gingrich was the first of the
presidential campaign season, at least for Gingrich. Based on his
performance, he'll be a formidable debate opponent for his fellow
Republicans and, who knows, maybe President Obama. The former House
Speaker demonstrated his ability to speak easily and at length on what
will be the most prominent issues of the campaign, like the economy,
national security, health-care reform, and immigration. He also
briefly shared his thoughts on gay marriage:
So Gingrich's argument is that:
1. He believes that marriage should be only between a man and a woman.
2. The GWU student believes that marriage should be between anyone who
wants to get married.
3. Both have an equal right to their own beliefs.
4. Gay people can't get married.
Something weird happened there between 3 and 4. The logical solution
would be that gay people can get gay married, Newt Gingrich can get
straight married, and nobody has to force their own personal beliefs
on the other. But Gingrich doesn't come to that conclusion for some
reason. Admittedly, neither does about half the country, and
Gingrich's position is widely accepted, especially among Republican
primary voters, the first group he has to impress.
But here's a prediction: Gay marriage may not be a hugely important
issue in the election, but because President Obama seems destined to
announce his embrace of gay marriage in the not-too-distant future, it
will be an issue. And you just know how Obama is going explain his
change of heart, whenever he's asked about it, in debates and town
halls and TV interviews — with stirring language about upholding core
American ideals like equality, individual freedom, and loving thy
neighbor. Maybe our liberal New Yorker mindset is tainting our
thinking, but it's not hard to imagine Obama's conversion pushing a
populace already rapidly warming to the idea of gay marriage further
in that direction, to the point that a clear, reliable majority of the
country finds the arguments of Gingrich (and the rest of the
Republican field) as hollow and unconvincing as they truly are. At the
very least, Gingrich may want to start thinking about how to deliver
these unconvincing arguments without a sneer.
More:
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/02/lets_tear_apart_newt_gingrichs.html
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Reuters) - President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats in the Senate
blocked a Republican bid on Wednesday to repeal his healthcare
overhaul, a year-old law whose ultimate fate likely rests with the
U.S. Supreme Court.
On a party-line vote of 51-47, the Senate rejected a Republican
measure to rescind the law that aims to provide more than 30 million
uninsured Americans with medical coverage while requiring nearly all
to be insured or pay a fine. Sixty votes were needed to clear a
procedural hurdle against repeal.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid scoffed at Republican efforts,
saying: "They want to replace patients' rights with insurance
companies' power. They want to replace health with sickness. They want
to replace the promise of tomorrow with the pain of yesterday."
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell countered: "The case against
this bill is more compelling every day. Everything we learn tells us
it was a bad idea. That it should be repealed and replaced. The courts
say so. The American people say so."
The Senate voted two days after a federal judge struck down the 2010
law as unconstitutional, a ruling the Obama administration promptly
announced it would appeal.
The Republican-led House of Representatives, in keeping a campaign
vow, voted to repeal the healthcare law last month.
Senate rejection of the repeal effort means the law's fate will likely
be decided by court challenges and eventually the U.S. Supreme Court,
a process that could extend into next year.
A federal judge in Florida on Monday ruled that Congress overstepped
its authority in requiring that nearly all Americans obtain insurance
or pay a fine.
Ramifications of the new law for the health sector have been
widespread, affecting Aetna Inc , WellPoint Inc and other health
insurers as well as drugmakers, device companies and hospitals.
States, struggling to balance their books in the aftermath of the
recent economic downturn, also face higher costs for the Medicaid
health program for the poor.
Democrats say the law benefits people who had been unable to obtain
coverage and ought to be maintained and improved.
HEARING HELD ON LAW'S CONSTITUTIONALITY
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday held the first
congressional hearing on the constitutionality of the law.
Republican Senator Charles Grassley, a one-time participant in
drafting the law who later withdrew from negotiations, said it was
unclear what the Supreme Court may decide.
"What is clear is that if this law is constitutional, Congress can
make Americans buy anything that Congress wants," Grassley said.
Democrats say they believe the Supreme Court will ultimately decide in
favor of the law.
Assistant Senate Democratic leader Dick Durbin said a number of
landmark laws, including the 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1935 Social
Security retirement program, ran into trouble in lower courts before
being upheld by the Supreme Court.
"I believe the same will happen with the Affordable Care Act," Durbin
said of the law being challenged in many courts.
"For those keeping score, 12 federal district court judges have
dismissed challenges to the law, two have found the law to be
constitutional and two have found the opposite," Durbin said.
While the Senate blocked appeal, it approved a measure to rescind a
provision that Democrats and Republicans agreed saddled small
businesses with excessive paperwork.
Republicans vowed to keep pushing to roll back other provisions.
McConnell said: "We think this is just the beginning. This issue is
still ahead of us and we will be going back at it in a variety of
different ways."
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
By Laura Bly, USA TODAY
Punxsutawney Phil, right, is held by Ben Hughes after emerging from
his burrow on Gobblers Knob in Punxsutawney, Pa., to see his shadow
and forecast six more weeks of winter weather Feb. 2, 2010.
CAPTIONBy Gene J. Puskar, AP In the hit 1993 comedy Groundhog Day,
weatherman Bill Murray's worst nightmare is to keep waking up in the
snowy Pennsylvania town of Punxsutawney - home of a pudgy,
prognosticating rodent named Phil.
Murray's disdain notwithstanding, Phil's Feb. 2 forecasts have been
drawing revelers to Punxsutawney for 125 years ... and today was no
exception, despite freezing rain and a wind advisory. Shivering
celebrants watched as Phil emerged from his temporary burrow—a
simulated tree stump at the rural site of Gobbler's Knob - and, to no
one's surprise, failed to see his shadow. The subsequent verdict from
his handlers: The Pittsburgh Steelers are headed to the Super Bowl,
and spring is around the corner.
RELATED: How accurate is the groundhog at predicting weather?
For those of us who haven't made the trek to Punxsutawney, about 80
miles northeast of Pittsburgh, Phil is going high-tech with texts,
Foursquare badges and Facebook updates of his early morning forecast.
Fans could watch streaming video of the big announcement here.
As for snuggling like Murray and co-star Andie MacDowell in that
Punxsutawney B&B? "That was a bit of Hollywood fiction," the tourist
office notes. " There really is a Cherry Street, but there is no bed &
breakfast there. You could stay at the Pantall Hotel, which is where
Bill Murray stayed when he visited in 1992."
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
![[]](http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/u.s.-drone-unmanned-aerial-vehicle.jpg)
Then why would President Bush Jr. be the one who asks for a $700
billion bailout for them?
What is really happening there is a wooing of the 2 major political
parties of big money donations from Wall Street.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
The only thing I can think of is not from an order from Egypt, but by
order of a US government agency.
Which would mean that Obama is out-right lying about any support for
protesters.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Please refrain from sending your Reich wingnut Islamophobic
anti-American hate, lies, and false smear!
This makes you look like a complete moron.
On 2/2/11, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:
> <http://twg2a.wordpress.com/author/twg2a/> The White House Jihadist,
> Obama, Stands by Muslim Brotherhood Endorsement
> <http://twg2a.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/the-white-house-jihadist-obama-stands-by-muslim-brotherhood-endorsement/>
> *twg2a PitBull <http://twg2a.wordpress.com/author/twg2a/>* | February 2,
> 2011 at 12:46 | Categories:
> Communism/Marxism/Racism<http://twg2a.wordpress.com/?category_name=communismmarxismracism>,
> Islam <http://twg2a.wordpress.com/?category_name=islam> | URL:
> http://wp.me/pMJTI-Ky
>
> Obama proved, long ago, his allegiance to his brothers in islam. The United
> States Of America MUST remove this islamist from OUR White House. Before
> it's too late. ********************************************************
> Israel National News by Hillel Fendel For the first time, a U.S. government
> supports granting a government role to an extremist Islamic organization:
> the Muslim Brotherhood [...]
>
> Read more of this
> post<http://twg2a.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/the-white-house-jihadist-obama-stands-by-muslim-brotherhood-endorsement/>
>
> Add a comment to this
> post<http://twg2a.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/the-white-house-jihadist-obama-stands-by-muslim-brotherhood-endorsement/#respond>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/twg2a.wordpress.com/2886/>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/twg2a.wordpress.com/2886/>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/twg2a.wordpress.com/2886/>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/twg2a.wordpress.com/2886/>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/twg2a.wordpress.com/2886/>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/twg2a.wordpress.com/2886/>
> <http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/twg2a.wordpress.com/2886/>
>
> [image: WordPress]
>
> WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/> | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
> Manage
> Subscriptions<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&email=baconlard%40gmail.com>|
> Unsubscribe<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=5d39acfd19218362d540a3fc3dc3315d&email=baconlard%40gmail.com&b=ufJ6RMNmvWO7w9%7ELwC%2BX%7E%7Cy3uIeKv%5BKbffPTsM%2BZp>|
> Reach
> out to your own subscribers with
> WordPress.com.<http://wordpress.com/signup/?ref=email>
>
> *Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:*
> http://subscribe.wordpress.com
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
That's a moderated group.
Surely there are unmoderated Egypt groups...
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
 | Repeal of Obamacare Falls Short 4 Votes in Senate |
Actually, I'm surprised that it failed to pass by only four votes. Looks like a few DemonRats actually paid attention to the midterm elections and decided to amend their original health care votes:
Senate Republicans lose vote on health law
By DAVID ESPO, AP - via Yahoo News
WASHINGTON – A Republican drive to repeal the year-old health care law ended in party-line defeat in the Senate on Wednesday, leaving the Supreme Court to render a final, unpredictable verdict on an issue steeped in political and constitutional controversy. The vote was 47-51. Moments earlier, the Senate agreed to make one relatively minor change in the law, voting to strip out a paperwork requirement for businesses.
President Barack Obama, who has vowed to veto any total repeal of his signature legislative accomplishment, has said he would accept the change. It does not directly affect health care.
Republicans conceded in advance their attempt at total repeal would fall short, but they accomplished an objective of forcing rank and file Democrats to take a position on an issue that reverberated in the 2010 campaign and may play a role in 2012.
[...]
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
| | The White House Jihadist, Obama, Stands by Muslim Brotherhood Endorsementtwg2a PitBull | February 2, 2011 at 12:46 | Categories: Communism/Marxism/Racism, Islam | URL: http://wp.me/pMJTI-Ky |
Obama proved, long ago, his allegiance to his brothers in islam. The United States Of America MUST remove this islamist from OUR White House. Before it's too late. ******************************************************** Israel National News by Hillel Fendel For the first time, a U.S. government supports granting a government role to an extremist Islamic organization: the Muslim Brotherhood [...]
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com
 | MSNBC's Rachel Maddow duped by Satire Site...blames Glenn Beck (Video)Scotty Starnes | February 2, 2011 at 6:30 PM | Tags: Christwire, Glenn Beck, MSNBC, Noel Sheppard, Rachel Maddow, Sarah Palin | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-4kx |
Another pseudo-intellect from the left, MSNBS's Rachel Maddow, was duped by a satirical website called Christwire. Maddow used Christwire's 'information' to attack Sarah Palin. The problem? It was fake.
Watch the smarmy lib-twit at work...
After realizing that she had been duped, Maddow blamed Fox News' Glenn Beck and other conservatives for her getting duped.
Noel Sheppard, over atNewsbusters.orgreports:
As NewsBusters previously reported, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Monday got duped by a satirical website quoting from their spoof article about Sarah Palin advocating an attack on Egypt as if it was a serious commentary.
On Tuesday, proving once again that it takes a lot of rationalizations to be a liberal these days, Maddow blamed her mistake on Fox News's Glenn Beck and other prominent conservatives (video follows with partial transcript and commentary):
| | WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress! |
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com