Friday, December 3, 2010
Re: Fwd: STEVE MARTIN BORES THE JEWS
Steve's way too cool to believe in a jewish god
On Dec 2, 2:13 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> They should have hired Dennis Miller - he's a lot more interesting
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: STEVE MARTIN BORES THE JEWS
> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 13:54:08 -0500 (EST)
> From: claguerra...@aol.com
> To: Rhomp2...@earthlink.net
>
> 'Y' pay to see boring Martin?
>
> By TIM PERONE
> /Last Updated:/ 9:40 AM, December 2, 2010
> /Posted:/ 1:55 AM, December 2, 2010
> Hosting the Oscars was a breeze -- it's entertaining the audience at the
> 92nd Street Y that's the real challenge.
> An interview with famed funnyman Steve Martin was apparently so boring
> to the sold-out audience at the Upper East Side center Monday night that
> all attendees will be receiving a full refund, a 92nd Street Y
> spokeswoman told The Post.
> All 900 people who sat through the hourlong interview with Martin, which
> focused on art, are entitled to get their $50 back.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: Fwd: Hillary Clinton: Cabinet Post Will Be Last Public Job
Its a pretty good gig to go out on.
She won't challenge BO in 2012. Last one to try that was Ted Kennedy
with Carter. It killed both of them. Hilly ain't dumb.
On Dec 3, 11:42 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Be nice if we could believe this one - bet she hopes to get drafted in 2012.
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Hillary Clinton: Cabinet Post Will Be Last Public Job
> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:47:21 GMT
> From: Newsmax.com <news...@reply.newsmax.com>
>
> Reply-To: news...@reply.newsmax.com
> To: rhomp2...@earthlink.com <rhomp2...@earthlink.com>
>
> Newsmax.com
>
> *Breaking from Newsmax.com*
>
> *Hillary Clinton: Cabinet Post Will Be Last Public Job*
>
> Hillary Rodham Clinton says her work as U.S. secretary of state will be
> her final public position.
>
> She told an interviewer in the Persian Gulf nation of Bahrain that she
> does not plan to run for president. And she appeared to rule out taking
> any other public role, saying that instead she expects to return to
> private life as an advocate for women and children around the globe.
>
> *Editor's Notes:*
>
> *Special:* *The 8-Week Plan to Improve Memory After Age 50*
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?KKCvYij3Y0Y6aD0Tn5MBSJPFDRrztJR1K&https://ww...>
>
> *Stop Arthritis Pain Naturally, Avoid Drugs*
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?KK4vYcjxY-XKat0Tj4M6KEP7GQrztfRAK&http://w3....>
>
> She said she had enjoyed an interesting and rewarding public career and
> will be ready to get back to the advocacy work she did as a young lawyer.
>
> Some had speculated she might succeed Robert Gates after his expected
> retirement next year as secretary of defense.
>
> � Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
> material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
>
> *Additional Links:*
>
> *Parkinson's Is Now Epidemic: Protect Yourself Today*
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K64RXij3w-YvsDTHn5MKHJPFGQlzxJRAK&http://w3....>
>
> *ALERT:* *7 Steps to Safely Get Off Statins*
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?KKCRXcjx.M1vat0Yj4.BSJC7DRrzxJUAK&http://w3....>
>
> Forward to a Friend
> <http://news.newsmax.com/default.aspx?KZ4RXij3YM16ax0Wh9Y6KEPmDXrztJU1K>
>
> This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. You have received this *Newsmax*
> e-mail because you subscribed to it or someone forwarded it to you. To
> opt out, see the links below.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *TO ADVERTISE*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For information on advertising, please contact Newsmax Advertising Sales
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?KKCvXclx.0XHsxdYn9YKK2U7kQlkxJR1K&http://w3....>
> via e-mail.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *TO SUBSCRIBE*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If this e-mail has been forwarded to you and you would like to sign up,
> please click here
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6CvXil3t01Hat0Yn9WKK2U7DQlzxfUAK&http://w3....>.
>
> Remove
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6CRYilxtMYvXD0TGoW6KEUmkXrktfRAK&http://w3.newsmax.com/emails/profile/index.cfm?email_address=rhomp2...@earthlink.com&esp_job_id=1030616>
> your e-mail address from our list or modify
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6CRYilxtMYvXD0TGoW6KEUmkXrktfRAK&http://w3.newsmax.com/emails/profile/index.cfm?email_address=rhomp2...@earthlink.com&esp_job_id=1030616>
> your profile. We respect your right to privacy. View
> <http://news.newsmax.com/?K6CvXil3t01Hat0Yn9WKK2U7DQlzxfUAK&http://www...>
> our policy.
>
> This e-mail was sent by:
> *Newsmax.com*
> 4152 West Blue Heron Blvd., Ste. 1114
> Riviera Beach, FL 33404 USA
>
> 1030616
> B3B9-1- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: Lawyer: Sweden Investigating Assange For Sex Without Condom
I don't need a condom.
On Dec 3, 12:12 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> Lawyer: Sweden Investigating Assange For Sex Without Condomhttp://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/sweden-assange-sex-without-condom/
>
> --
> *I reserve the right to do as I please.*
>
> *"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover
> of law, and with the colors of justice ..."
> - U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982)
>
> "If Americans wish to be free of judicial tyranny, they must at least
> develop basic knowledge of the judicial role in our republican
> government. The present state of affairs is a direct result of our
> collective ignorance."
> - Ron Paul*
>
> *Our courts will never be fair and just again until we force the courts
> to follow their own rules. Do not allow yourself to be ruled by tyrants.
> Learn how to control corrupt judges and crooked lawyers
> <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004> so you can get
> Justice! Learn to litigate: Buy and Study JURISDICTIONARY
> <http://www.jurisdictionary.com?refercode=CG0004>. The best course
> available for Pro Se and Pro Per litigants.*
>
> *I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal
> Government*http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
>
> *Government is only as strong as those who allow themselves to be
> governed are weak.*
>
> *"We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get
> caught exercising them."
> - Terry Mitchell
>
> "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that
> cannot be."
> - Thomas Jefferson***
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Lawyer: Sweden Investigating Assange For Sex Without Condom
Lawyer: Sweden Investigating Assange For Sex Without Condom
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/sweden-assange-sex-without-condom/
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/sweden-assange-sex-without-condom/
--
I reserve the right to do as I please.
"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice ..."
- U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982)
"If Americans wish to be free of judicial tyranny, they must at least develop basic knowledge of the judicial role in our republican government. The present state of affairs is a direct result of our collective ignorance."
- Ron Paul
Our courts will never be fair and just again until we force the courts to follow their own rules. Do not allow yourself to be ruled by tyrants. Learn how to control corrupt judges and crooked lawyers so you can get Justice! Learn to litigate: Buy and Study JURISDICTIONARY. The best course available for Pro Se and Pro Per litigants.
I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
Government is only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak.
"We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get caught exercising them."
- Terry Mitchell
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that cannot be."
- Thomas Jefferson
I reserve the right to do as I please.
"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice ..."
- U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982)
"If Americans wish to be free of judicial tyranny, they must at least develop basic knowledge of the judicial role in our republican government. The present state of affairs is a direct result of our collective ignorance."
- Ron Paul
Our courts will never be fair and just again until we force the courts to follow their own rules. Do not allow yourself to be ruled by tyrants. Learn how to control corrupt judges and crooked lawyers so you can get Justice! Learn to litigate: Buy and Study JURISDICTIONARY. The best course available for Pro Se and Pro Per litigants.
I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
Government is only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak.
"We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get caught exercising them."
- Terry Mitchell
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that cannot be."
- Thomas Jefferson
Re: Fwd: Congratulations on creating your new LinkedIn Group!
I created one too, but its boring shit about metadata
On Dec 3, 11:34 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> LinkedIn
>
> Hi
>
> Congratulations on creating your new LinkedIn group!
>
> *TSAResistance*http://www.linkedin.com/e/-9f4mfw-gh9ajgv6-3a/vgh/3705903/<http://www.linkedin.com/e/-9f4mfw-gh9ajgv6-3a/vgh/3705903/eml-grp-sub/>
>
> Send me an email for each new discussion
> »<http://www.linkedin.com/e/-9f4mfw-gh9ajgv6-3a/snp/3705903/true/grp_em...>
>
> Sincerely,
> LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Feds Involved In Major Checkpoint In Douglas County, Georgia
Feds Involved In Major Checkpoint In Douglas County, Georgia
http://www.ajc.com/news/feds-involved-in-major-643211.html
More civil rights violations conducted by the Feds. How long will it be before we cannot travel anywhere without encountering checkpoints?
--
http://www.ajc.com/news/feds-involved-in-major-643211.html
More civil rights violations conducted by the Feds. How long will it be before we cannot travel anywhere without encountering checkpoints?
--
I reserve the right to do as I please.
"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice ..."
- U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982)
"If Americans wish to be free of judicial tyranny, they must at least develop basic knowledge of the judicial role in our republican government. The present state of affairs is a direct result of our collective ignorance."
- Ron Paul
Our courts will never be fair and just again until we force the courts to follow their own rules. Do not allow yourself to be ruled by tyrants. Learn how to control corrupt judges and crooked lawyers so you can get Justice! Learn to litigate: Buy and Study JURISDICTIONARY. The best course available for Pro Se and Pro Per litigants.
I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
Government is only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak.
"We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get caught exercising them."
- Terry Mitchell
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that cannot be."
- Thomas Jefferson
"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice ..."
- U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982)
"If Americans wish to be free of judicial tyranny, they must at least develop basic knowledge of the judicial role in our republican government. The present state of affairs is a direct result of our collective ignorance."
- Ron Paul
Our courts will never be fair and just again until we force the courts to follow their own rules. Do not allow yourself to be ruled by tyrants. Learn how to control corrupt judges and crooked lawyers so you can get Justice! Learn to litigate: Buy and Study JURISDICTIONARY. The best course available for Pro Se and Pro Per litigants.
I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
Government is only as strong as those who allow themselves to be governed are weak.
"We have plenty of rights in this country, provided you don't get caught exercising them."
- Terry Mitchell
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that cannot be."
- Thomas Jefferson
**JP** Who supplicates for Martyrdom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197
**JP** Different Airline Dinners
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197
Fwd: Hillary Clinton: Cabinet Post Will Be Last Public Job
Be nice if we could believe this one - bet she hopes to get drafted in 2012.
-------- Original Message --------
-------- Original Message --------
| Subject: | Hillary Clinton: Cabinet Post Will Be Last Public Job |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2010 15:47:21 GMT |
| From: | Newsmax.com <newsmax@reply.newsmax.com> |
| Reply-To: | newsmax@reply.newsmax.com |
| To: | rhomp2002@earthlink.com <rhomp2002@earthlink.com> |
 |
|
Fwd: Breaking News Alert: Jobless rate rises to 9.8 %
-------- Original Message --------
| Subject: | Breaking News Alert: Jobless rate rises to 9.8 % |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:00:25 -0500 (EST) |
| From: | Boston.com Newsletters <newsletters@boston.com> |
| Reply-To: | Boston.com Newsletters <newsletters@boston.com> |
| To: | <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> |
The nation's unemployment rate climbed to 9.8 percent in November, a seven-month high, as job growth slowed. To read more, visit http://www.boston.com To automatically unsubscribe to this list: send a blank message to unsub-260611-468@unsub.boston.com To manage all of your Boston.com e-mails: visit the Boston.com Member Center or e-mail feedback@boston.com. Mailing address: Boston.com E-mail Administrator, 135 Morrissey Blvd.,Boston, MA 02125.
Fwd: Congratulations on creating your new LinkedIn Group!
| Hi Congratulations on creating your new LinkedIn group! TSAResistance Send me an email for each new discussion » Sincerely, |
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Fwd: New comment on "Petition and protest against TSA molestation"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: WASHINGTON DC CONNECTIONS <groups-noreply@linkedin.com>
Date: Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:03 PM
Subject: New comment on "Petition and protest against TSA molestation"
To: Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com>
From: WASHINGTON DC CONNECTIONS <groups-noreply@linkedin.com>
Date: Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:03 PM
Subject: New comment on "Petition and protest against TSA molestation"
To: Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com>
LinkedIn Groups | |
You all do realize that as travelers are subjected to intimate pat downs, the threat simply shifts to goods, equipment, luggage handlers, food service, and explosives concealed within the human body? Report back after you've been through the procedures a few dozen times. Meanwhile, could you not disagree civilly rather than with such vulgarly belligerent quasi-public ad hominem attacks? | |
| Like this discussion » Comment » Stop Following Discussion » | |
| | |
|
LinkedIn values your privacy. At no time has LinkedIn made your email address available to any other LinkedIn user without your permission. ©2010, LinkedIn Corporation. |
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Michelle Pelescak, MS/MBA, CNMT, Teresa Hartnett like this
26 comments
Follow Mary
Mary Mihalik • There's a difference between 'feeling' safe and BEING safe. Time and time again we have seen ourselves willingly giving up our civil liberties. From writ habeaus corpus to the new "hold-em up" pose for electronic strip searches (or you can choose the alternative 'freedom' pat down). Guilty before proven innocent?
Duck and cover - you'll protect yourself against nuclear fall out.
If there was truly threats to our safety, more deaths, disruption, and distruction can be done on a train at Penn Station NY or 30th St in Philly or Union Station in DC. Amtrak now allows unloaded firearms on trains - your ammunition can be in your luggage (like someone won't reach up to the overhead rack and re-load? seriously....) Heck, on a plain, you can set off a bomb on an airplane by using your cell phone to detonate a bomb concealed in your checked in luggage in the belly of the plane.
70% of all Americans - as represented by the comments to this post - do NOT object to the strip searches, electronic or otherwise. Not because it is actually making us safer, but simply because it feeds our fears and need to feel safer.
We had the technology in 2001 to stop the terrorists. And, yet, just this week, the hosts of Myth Busters smuggled on a bunch of case cutters, etc.
Duck and cover has a reprise in the new millenia.
The terrorists win. as pointed out, the threat simply shifts.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
~ Ben Franklin
Follow Ben
Ben Sims • I think that it would be far more inconvenient to be the victim of a terrorist attack of any flavor, than to be aggressively screened at the airport. I think I would rather see them use dogs more often though, of course if we do that then people who are afraid of dogs are being "terrorized" It's sad that we can't find a solution that provides real security, yet does not cause people to cry about being violated. These two goals seem in direct opposition. Until we find that solution, I'll stand firmly on the "not wanting to be blown up" side of the body scanner issue.
Follow Sigrid Caroline
Sigrid Caroline Schroder, JD • In a society which babbles about "boundaries" and "privacy rights," the mass acceptance of degrading public search and pat down is rather astounding when better technology for searching the person exists now and the real threat can be slipped onto the plane in a nearly infinite number of ways. Don't you think that all of you deserve a higher standard of technology and consideration? Has anyone asked David Grizzle, Chief Counsel of tthe FAA? We know terrorists aren't Boy Scouts, but there are better ways.
Jeffrey Rosen wrote a fascinating commentary in the Post on the 28th, aside from the real Constitutional issues, he pointed out the following technological argument:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/24/AR2010112404510.html
He wrote:"For example, Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport, the European airport that employs body-scanning machines most extensively, has incorporated crucial privacy and safety protections. Rejecting the "backscatter" machines used in the United States, which produce revealing images of the body and have raised concerns about radiation, the Dutch use scanners known as ProVision ATD, which employ radio waves with far lower frequencies than those used in common hand-held devices. If the software detects contraband or suspicious material under a passenger's clothing, it projects an outline of that area of the body onto a gender-neutral, blob-like human image, instead of generating a virtually naked image of the passenger. The passenger can then be taken aside for secondary screening. TSA Administrator John Pistole acknowledged in recent testimony that these "blob" machines, as opposed to the "naked" machines, are the "next generation" of screening technology. His concern, he said, is that "there are currently a high rate of false positives on that technology, so we're working through that." But courts might hold that, even with false positives, "blob" imaging technology that leads to a secondary pat-down is less invasive and more effective than imposing a choice between "naked" machines and intrusive pat-downs as primary screening for all passengers."
Follow Eric
Eric Davis • For those that are pointing out other means a bomb can get on... something this should put things into perspective.
We cannot eliminate the risk of an attack. There will always be a way around the system. As there is a way around every system. We can only work to prevent an attack as best as we possibly can. Safety is always a limitation on one's freedom. JUST ACCEPT THAT.
I will give you some perfect examples of safety that limit your freedom that you do everyday and you don't cry about it.
1. The seat belt. Yes, it is a law to put it on when you are in a vehicle. But who's right is it to restrain me in one?
1. Child safety seats. It makes total sense to have it, but who's right is it to force me to purchase something so my child can go in a car?
1. Suicide. Yes, you are not allowed to kill yourself. If you are suicidal and are caught before you do it successfully you will be put in a mental hospital. (I think I should have a right to live or die)
4. Risks in pregnancy. I can't specifically remember where the boundary lies, but in some cases the potential mother's life is put to the side for the sake of the unborn child. Even though the unborn are not considered living, essentially until they are born. (you cannot count them as a dependent or include them in upcoming expenses for debt evaluation, etc.
Is there a better way to do these scans? Maybe, but until they figure out a better way I am happy to let them scan me or feel me up to make it more difficult for them to get a knife or bomb through security. If you don't like it don't fly.
Follow Ben
Ben Sims • If you look closely Miss Schroder, I think you might find that those who babble, aren't the same one's who are accepting of these searches. They are very clearly two very different groups, you cant effectively lump them together to prove a point. This is very clearly apples to oranges. We, nationally are very divided on this issue. Either both sides can dial back the propaganda and work on a middle ground solution, or we can continue to have these little disagreements.
Bruce Majors • You know you have convinced me. But since Washington DC is no doubt a particular target I think we should have weekly inspections of your homes for dirty bombs. And strip searches and cavity searches of all of you who work in federal buildings.
And then we must RFID chip you and your children.
Perhaps given the mood of the electorate in fly over America, I could get that into some Congressional candidates platforms. Daily cavity and strip searches and RFID chipping of all federal employees and contractors, at least residing in DC.
Bend over honey. I am putting your chip in very deep.