 امریکی فوج ایک منصوبے کے تحت ایسے کمپیوٹرز کی تیاری پر کام شروع کر رہی ہے جو موجودہ کمپیوٹرز سے ہزار گنا تیز ہوں گے۔ امریکی فوج کے تحقیقاتی ادارے 'ڈیفنس ریسرچ پروجیکٹس ایجنسی' یعنی ڈارپا نے 'ایکسا سکیل' نامی نئے تیز رفتار کمپیوٹرز بنانے کے لیے کئی کپمنیوں کو تحقیقات کے لیے رقم فراہم کر دی ہے۔ موجود سب سے تیز کمپیوٹر کی فی سیکنڈ رفتار ایک 'پیٹا فلاپ' یعنی ایک ہزار کھرب کیلکولیشن فی سکینڈ ہے جب کہ 'ایکسا سکیل' کمپیوٹروں کی رفتار اس سے ہزار گنا زیادہ یعنی دس لاکھ کھرب کیلکولیشن فی سکینڈ ہو گی۔ امریکی فوج کے اس تحقیقاتی منصوبے کو 'یوبِکویٹس ہائی پرفارمنس کمپیوٹنگ پروگرام' یعنی 'یو ایچ پی سی' کے نام سے جانا جاتا ہے۔ امریکی دفاعی ادارے ڈارپا کا کہنا ہے کہ توقع ہے یہ ایکسا سکیل کمپیوٹر سنہ 2018 تک تیار ہو جائیں گے۔ ڈارپا کے مطابق اس منصوبے کا مقصد ایسے کمپیوٹر تیار کرنا ہے جو کہ آج کل کے دفاعی اور سکیورٹی ضروریات سے نمٹ سکیں۔ اس منصوبے کی خاص بات یہ ہے کہ اس میں ایسے کمپیوٹر ہارڈ ویئر تیار کرنے کی کوشش کی جائے گی جو کہ کمپیوٹرز کی اب تک کے ترقیاتی اصولوں سے کہیں بڑھ کر ہے۔ کمپیوٹر ٹیکنالوجی کے موجودہ اصولوں کے مطابق سلیکون کے ایک ٹکڑے پر ٹرانزسٹروں کی تعداد کو ہر دو سال میں دوگنا کیا جا سکتا ہے۔ اس اندازے کو موؤر کے قانون یعنی 'موؤرز لا' کے نام سے جانا جاتا ہے۔ اس منصوبے پر کام کرنے والی کمپنیوں کو یہ چیلنج درپیش ہے کہ وہ ایسے سلیکون چِپ ایجاد کریں جو ٹیکنالوجی کی بڑھتی ہوئی ضروریات سے تیز ترین انداز میں نمٹ سکیں۔ امریکہ میں فوجی تحقیقاتی ادارے ڈارپا کا کہنا ہے کہ اس منصوبے سے کمپیوٹر ٹیکنولوجی کا ایک نیا اور انقلابی دور شروع ہو جائے گا۔ ڈارپا کے مطابق اس کی کوشش یہ ہے کہ یہ نئی ٹیکنالوجی 'کمپیوٹرز کے ا FW: **JP** Birds need your attention this summerFrom: nadia073@gmail.com To: ; Subject: **JP** Birds need your attention this summer Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:14:11 +0100 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JoinPakistan" group. You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members. To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com & on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197 What You will hear when debating a Democrat
       
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. Moonbat Money
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. Doug Ross Needs Help: Name the Mosque-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. Podcast interview w/ Wick Sloane re higher education reform
Posted this morning at Electric Politics, an interview with Wick
Sloane on higher education reform. Wick, a Yale MBA and formerly high muckety-muck at a giant state university is now embedded at Bunker Hill Community College, in Boston, where he teaches expository writing. Wick also blogs at the website Inside Higher Ed. He asks, what to do with the 99% of college students who don't get into the top schools? Shouldn't people who want to go to college be able to get a degree? And must it be a four year degree? Wick's a sensible guy, an inspiration, and a real, albeit low-key, radical. If you like the podcast please feel free to redistribute the link. http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2010/08/scientia_potentia_est.html -- * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ Re: How Could Illegal Immigration Make America Any Worse Than It Already Is?"As a people that have long puffed out their chests for having the most free and richest country in the history of the world, it is hard for Americans to come to grips with the fact that their country is now a toilet (hat tip to Sean Gabb for this phenomenal metaphor). The country they have long viewed as a bastion of liberty and free markets is now nothing more than a bankrupt, run-of-the-mill police state, but many Americans have been slow to recognize this, and they continue to flail away at issues that are completely irrelevant or quixotic. The prime example of this is the fact that many Americans still waste their time trying to get Congressman X or Senator Y elected, as though it really matters whether the man in Washington robbing them to fund war, government eavesdropping, and corporate welfare is from the Donkey syndicate or the Elephant syndicate. There is a very fine line dividing the cautiously optimistic from the hopelessly naïve, and I fear that an overwhelming number of Americans have slipped into the latter category as they wistfully imagine that their government and their economy can be salvaged in the voting booth. "The truth is, no amount of voting and no amount of electioneering can make the American government or the American people any less bankrupt. No amount of voting and no amount of electioneering can roll back a government so militarized and secretive into a government circumscribed by the Constitution. No amount of voting and no amount of electioneering can save the American people from the excruciating economic depression that is coming, thanks to the Federal Reserve's monetary policies. Last, but certainly not least, no amount of voting and no amount of electioneering against so-called "illegal" immigration will save this country from any of its present or impending ills. This country was turned into a toilet by Americans in the voting booth, not by so-called "illegal" immigrants, and it certainly won't be saved by spending more time in the voting booth." -- Mark R. Crovelli How Could Illegal Immigration Make America Any Worse Than It Already Is?How Could Illegal Immigration Make America Any Worse Than It Already Is? by Mark R. Crovelli Way back in the 1950's, one could perhaps be excused for fearing that unhampered "illegal" immigration would lead to a dissolution of the American republic, as throngs of uneducated foreigners with different cultural values overran the existing American population. Indeed, one might have been justified in thinking, as many conservatives in fact did, that the unique "American experiment" depended upon the prevention of an influx of foreigners of the old-world mentality, who did not understand or appreciate individual liberty the way Americans did. At this point in the American experiment's history, however, what grounds are there for fearing that "illegal" immigrants will damage the character of this country? What could "they" possibly do to this country that has not already been done by ourselves and the plundering and lying rats in Washington? In other words, how can it get any worse than it already is? We live under a government that is bankrupting itself and ourselves fighting two wars that have no point whatsoever. Thousands of American boys, the seed corn of this nation, are being slaughtered by sheepherders and poppy farmers thousands of miles away, and we are being bankrupted in order to pay for it, for no reason whatsoever. The ruling class and its foreign puppet masters have already drawn up plans for an even more lunatic and pointless war thousands of miles away. If the American borders were thrown wide open, and millions upon millions of impoverished illiterates from the third world flooded into America, how could America's foreign policy get any worse? What could illegal immigrants do to us that would be worse than sending hundreds of thousands of American men on a futile mission to fight poppy farmers, and die in the deserts and mountains of Asia? We live under a government that claims the right to execute us when we travel abroad, with no trial whatsoever. What could penniless "illegal" immigrants do to us that would be worse than being threatened with assassination by the most powerful government in the history of the world? Do you really fear sandal-clad, strawberry-picking migrant workers from El Salvador more than you fear the CIA? We live under a government that has an "intelligence" apparatus so large and powerful that not even its purported bosses know what the hell it's doing. Over 1,200 government organizations are involved in "intelligence gathering" in this country, by which is meant that hundreds of thousands of people are involved in shameless spying on the people of the world, including Americans, without any oversight whatsoever. What could "illegal" immigrants do to us that would be worse than having everything we say, and every penny we spend, monitored by faceless government bureaucrats empowered to use that information to send us to prison or murder us when we travel abroad? Can the Mexicans who installed your sprinkler system really instill as much fear into your heart as the NSA, IRS and FBI? We live under a government that claims the right to monitor and ban us from consuming or selling certain substances. It also claims the right to throw us in prison for years if we happen to like to consume or sell those substances. Ironically, that same government has a sordid and bloody history of trafficking those very same substances to finance murder and mayhem abroad, but it will destroy your life completely without batting an eye if you act similarly. What could an "illegal" line cook from Chihuahua do to you that would compare with having a bunch of masked thugs break into your house, shoot your dogs, and send you to prison for smoking or selling a plant? A plant, for crying out loud! No Mexican or Nicaraguan immigrant that I've ever heard of has ever locked up an American for years, or shot an American's dogs, just because he happens to have a plant in his house. We live under a government that engineered the largest and most destructive economic bubble in the history of the world. Millions upon millions of Americans (and so-called "illegal" immigrants, I would hasten to add) have lost, and continue to lose, their homes and their life savings, thanks to a system that allows for the ruling caste to tinker with the money supply and ,ipso facto, interest rates. In the big picture, what possible difference could it make if a few million more Mexicans make their way up to this country in order to pour concrete driveways and lay sod? The American economy is already a hopeless and putrid morass, so what difference could a few million refugees from America's "drug war" in Mexico really make? As a people that have long puffed out their chests for having the most free and richest country in the history of the world, it is hard for Americans to come to grips with the fact that their country is now a toilet (hat tip to Sean Gabb for this phenomenal metaphor). The country they have long viewed as a bastion of liberty and free markets is now nothing more than a bankrupt, run-of-the-mill police state, but many Americans have been slow to recognize this, and they continue to flail away at issues that are completely irrelevant or quixotic. The prime example of this is the fact that many Americans still waste their time trying to get Congressman X or Senator Y elected, as though it really matters whether the man in Washington robbing them to fund war, government eavesdropping, and corporate welfare is from the Donkey syndicate or the Elephant syndicate. There is a very fine line dividing the cautiously optimistic from the hopelessly naïve, and I fear that an overwhelming number of Americans have slipped into the latter category as they wistfully imagine that their government and their economy can be salvaged in the voting booth. The truth is, no amount of voting and no amount of electioneering can make the American government or the American people any less bankrupt. No amount of voting and no amount of electioneering can roll back a government so militarized and secretive into a government circumscribed by the Constitution. No amount of voting and no amount of electioneering can save the American people from the excruciating economic depression that is coming, thanks to the Federal Reserve's monetary policies. Last, but certainly not least, no amount of voting and no amount of electioneering against so-called "illegal" immigration will save this country from any of its present or impending ills. This country was turned into a toilet by Americans in the voting booth, not by so-called "illegal" immigrants, and it certainly won't be saved by spending more time in the voting booth. The important thing to do at this point is to psychologically accept the fact this country is a putrefying mockery of everything it once stood for. When one comes to grips with this inexorable fact, it seems almost ridiculous to think of trying to keep other people off this supposedly sacred soil. People the world over would laugh themselves into a frenzy if they heard that the Congolese had become agitated over so-called "illegal" immigration from Gabon. Congo is a horrible economic and political wasteland that is not worth "protecting" from immigrants. So, too, will people laugh themselves sick when they hear that the American dodos are drunk with worry that their country will be overrun with "illegal" immigrants. They should, and will, think to themselves: "What exactly do those spoiled, uneducated, lazy Americans think they are protecting from "illegal" immigration?" What is even more troubling is the fact that most Americans never think about the consequences to themselves that will follow from building giant fences and hiring even more armed thugs in order to keep out the "illegals." They apparently assume that there will never come a time when they themselves will need to move to another country in order to escape from the economic and political nightmare that is erupting all around them. Drunk on the chauvinistic view that America is and always will be "NUMBER 1!," these anti-immigration ostriches use their own hands to help to build the fences that will bar their own escape in the future. The take home message here is that America is already a gigantic economic and political toilet. Whether it is worth your time to keep immigrants from falling into this toilet is up to you. I, for one, welcome the unpropagandized masses from abroad, who work hard and don't try to tell me how much I should love a government that threatens to murder be when I travel. Plus, I value the ability to leave this country as much or more than trying to keep out people who happen to speak Spanish. Put differently, my advice to you, the next time you hear some hyperventilating, flag waving jackass going on and on about how we need to keep the "illegals" out of America, is to congratulate him for his sensitive humanitarian impulse to keep those innocent foreigners from falling into the reeking hell hole we call "America." http://www.lewrockwell.com/crovelli/crovelli49.1.html Beware of Mosque-Building Muslims
"Crusaders of the Hal Lindsey variety remind us that Islam's Holy Koran is replete with instructions to the faithful to kill infidels. It is common to hear Islam portrayed as a shadowy system of government, bent on world domination and terrorism, not a religion at all. If the Koran is full of sociopathic calls to murder, can we not say the same thing of our own Holy Bible? Have you read the Old Testament? Kill the women, kill the children, slaughter the cattle and leave them to rot. Not one shall be left alive. They shall surely be stoned. Suffer not a witch to live. Slit the lamb's throat and spill his blood on the holy alter of God. Excuse that as you will, but you can't deny it's there. As Christians we have to each come to terms with it. "
Beware of Mosque-Building Muslims by Britt Combs Some ideas are so dingy you assume people must be kidding. When lunatics like lawyer, author and Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy bleat that a secret cabal of atheistic "liberals" like the president and his loyal army of Muslim terrorists are working together to realize their common goal – the imposition of "Sharia Law" on the American people, well what else can you assume? This wild nonsense has been escalating for years. Ten years ago we heard that 19 highjackers were merely the vanguard for "hundreds of millions" of crack suicide troops, anxious, even gleeful, to martyr themselves killing Americans. They hate our freedom, our way of life and democracy. They hate semi-naked women and sausage biscuits so passionately they will gladly die to hurt us. President Bush made conciliatory comments even while mobilizing America for a permanent "War of Terror" by calling Islam a religion of peace. But his followers knew he was speaking tongue-in-cheek. He had to say that to keep the damn liberals from freaking out. Bush could say whatever he wanted, but Rush Limbaugh never repeated that hippie talk. Ann Coulter went so far as to suggest we should literally launch a new crusade, specifically to convert Muslims to Christianity at gunpoint. It's only gotten worse since then. One particularly nutty Web site, Jihad Watch, says there are two kinds of Islam: "Terror Jihad," which blows up buildings as on 9/11 and "Stealth Jihad" which disarms its enemies by not blowing things up. The stealth Jihadist pretends to be nice and neighborly. Then, when your back is turned, Presto! he builds a mosque. Next thing you know, it's Sharia Law. How do they think Muslims can enforce their religious code in America? Breed like rats until they are the majority, then get elected to Congress and change the Constitution? Never mind the logistics, friends; they'll put Sharia on us if we don't kill them first. We must nuke the enemy in order to preserve the peace. Today, as plans come together to build "Cordoba House" a sort of Muslim equivalent to the YMCA, complete with a mosque, on the south end of Manhattan, two huge city blocks way from the old World Trade Center, hysterical right-wing media turned that into a "mosque at ground zero." As if there hadn't been mosques in New York city before. Sarah Palin told her numbskulls that the very idea of a mosque in Manhattan is "a provocation" and "a stab in the heart." It's not just in New York. Lunatics in Murfreesboro, Tenn. showed up to protest the construction of mosques, hoping the county government will block building permits. A mosque is just too painful for 9/11 survivors to see, we are told. I imagine the sight of a Christian church might be painful to American Indians. Surely French Huguenots feel a stab in the heart when they see a Roman Catholic church under construction. Crusaders of the Hal Lindsey variety remind us that Islam's Holy Koran is replete with instructions to the faithful to kill infidels. It is common to hear Islam portrayed as a shadowy system of government, bent on world domination and terrorism, not a religion at all. If the Koran is full of sociopathic calls to murder, can we not say the same thing of our own Holy Bible? Have you read the Old Testament? Kill the women, kill the children, slaughter the cattle and leave them to rot. Not one shall be left alive. They shall surely be stoned. Suffer not a witch to live. Slit the lamb's throat and spill his blood on the holy alter of God. Excuse that as you will, but you can't deny it's there. As Christians we have to each come to terms with it. We manage somehow. We don't go from getting saved at the alter call to gunning down infidels next week because it's in the Bible that we should. At least most of us don't; Eric Rudolph did. As believers, we just assume the Lord was in a really bad mood that day and skip ahead to the nice parts, like "love one another, for love is of God…" Why is it so hard to imagine that Muslims generally take their holy book with a grain of salt, just as we do? As I write, many Americans are urging Israel to attack Iran. We send money to radical Israeli politicians, urging them to go for the throat and show no mercy to Palestinians. House Republicans promise to join the attack. Aside from a few half-hearted, vague promises to pull out a few troops far in the future, the president has shown none of his campaign dovishness. We surround Iran on two sides. Whatever rank and file Democrats may believe, Democrats in power are just as hawkish as the Republicans. Meanwhile American school kids are taught the blatant lie that government spending and World War II ended the Depression that freedom caused. Crusaders are thirsty for Muslim blood, Israel is governed by genocidal lunatics, both of America's political parties are completely sold on endless war, the people are convinced that war brings good living and prosperity and the military industry sees dramatic profits on the horizon. And you wonder why on earth Iran would want a nuclear bomb? The Lord once promised, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God." He must have known when he said it that he probably wouldn't have to make good on it. How many peacemakers do you know? Religious tolerance isn't something we do because it's an alleged founding principle; who cares about the traditions and principles of dead men? We practice tolerance because we are decent; we are not dogs. We act like we weren't raised in a shed out back. Recent debate about the religious liberties of American Muslims has not only cast tolerance aside, but unearthed deeper issues from the darkest parts of the human soul. The dispute about Cordoba House – which upper-class politicians and pundits have deceptively (and opportunistically) dubbed the "Ground Zero Mosque" – has simply got to stop. It's no longer funny. After last week's column, one McDowellNews.com reader promised to bomb the mosque. Imagine that. Readers are publicly threatening, promising to commit acts of murder and terror mere "steps away" from Ground Zero. Bill O'Reilly, Sarah Palin, Jay Sekulow, Bill Bennett and hosts of lesser pundits plumbed new depths of depravity, manufacturing a scandal where there was none. They did everything they could to get the unwashed masses' panties in a collective wad about the Cordoba House, and it worked. To America's everlasting shame, the people let themselves be reduced to a ravening mob. In a regrettably rare moment of right-mindedness, the president accurately and correctly framed the situation. He said he has no dispute with people exercising their constitutional religious rights on private property in accordance with local laws and ordinances. Part of that statement is so important it deserves a line of its own, without qualifiers. Private property. There. The most beautiful words in the English language. And the opportunistic and treacherous Republican intelligentsia completely missed it. Republicans and Tea Partiers, I implore you: you cannot, must not, simply cannot demand that government force be brought to bear against the exercise of property rights. We slept and woke up in a bizarro universe, where Democrats (God help us all) are championing property and religious freedom and the Republicans are brazenly and unashamedly demanding that big government use the violence and power at its disposal to prevent the free exercise of religion and the development and use of property. The lies have barraged us in machine gun bursts. Cordoba House is blocks, not "a few steps" as the simple-minded and incurious Sarah Palin said – from the old World Trade Center site. Andrew McCarthy said that Cordoba House is an example of Islamic triumphalism, the tendency to build mosques on sites of great victories. No it is not. It is an example of Islamic exercise of private property rights. Something that until last week Republicans used to claim to favor. O'Reilly admitted the Muslims had rights to the property they own, but said it was "inappropriate" and "insensitive." So now Republicans suddenly believe we should legislate based on "feelings" and being all "sensitive." Do Republicans, of all people, now honestly mean to say that Americans must refrain from any act that hurts others' feelings? Our freedoms end when someone gets their feelings hurt? We discussed this business about hurt feelings last week. I said there were plenty of people who no doubt get their feelings hurt remembering massacres and injustices committed by Christians against Indians; American soldiers against Muslims. I asked if we should stop building Christian churches to spare the Indians' feelings, or stop displaying the U.S. flag to spare the feelings of Filipino Muslims. I got lots of hysterical responses, but not one reader addressed that blatant double standard. No, we must abolish all religious liberty and property rights to spare the "families of 9/11" but we needn't bother about the namby-pamby feelings of our victims; they deserved it. No one addressed that point, because they can't justify it. What can they say? Bryan Fischer, of the American Family Association, an ostensibly Christian organization, said that "permits should not be granted to build even one more mosque in the United States." He said he can literally see into the hearts of each and every mosque, every cleric, every worshipper, and he has seen that they are all animated by one goal; the overthrow of America and, of course, Sharia Law. Fischer has single-handedly judged more than a billion human souls and found them all wanting and damnable. Not long ago, Christians found that sort of presumption to be not only objectionable, but blasphemous. No longer. Today we have a New New Covenant and the Golden Rule no longer applies to us. Sarah Palin was near tears Monday night on Fox News, demanding that the president use his "clout" and "pull" to "encourage" the Muslims to choose another site for their mosque. O'Reilly had similar comments. It didn't dawn on either of them that they might offer to purchase the old Burlington Coat Factory fair and square, just like the Muslims did, and use their property rights to put it to more "appropriate" use. Why didn't that occur to them? Because they want the issue to excite the dumbest voters into a rage that will endure through November. O'Reilly was practically dancing on his chair that 60 percent of Americans oppose the Cordoba House's construction. Obama, O'Reilly said, is on the unpopular side of an issue that will "do him no good at all." I don't often say this, but good for Obama. For once he has taken the right side of an issue without weighing the political consequences. It seems puerile to say this, but a lot of you seem to have forgotten it: Right is right and true is true, even if no one acknowledges it. Justice doesn't need to be popular. If 60 percent of Americans are vehemently opposed to religious liberty and the free exercise of private property rights, then 60 percent of Americans are stupid and wrong. I shudder for my country. We're a hair's breadth from a new national socialist republic of America. It sounds absurd, but what can you say when the majority of Americans are absolutely zealous about depriving the basic human rights of their fellow Americans? You can object; you can say that denying them the right to build mosques on their private property is not the same as rounding them up into camps and gassing them. But how far removed is it? The majority of Germans in the late 1930s had no problem seeing Jews barred from commerce and run out of their homes. They probably wouldn't have approved of the camps and the gassings, but once government learned that the people approved stripping the Jews of their rights, the camps and the killings were a natural progression. All it took was a general contempt among the masses for the Jews' humanity, and government handles the rest. There is a general disregard for the humanity of Muslims in America today. That's an extreme scenario, granted, but I submit that you cannot use the dehumanizing, exclusionary rhetoric these Republicans have been invoking recently, whipping the uncivilized, unschooled and unsophisticated masses into a vengeful frenzy, without inviting bloodshed. Are Democrats any defense against the rising tide of ethnic cleansing? Sensitive to the political winds, Democrats like Sen. Harry Reid are cynically jumping ship, opposing Cordoba House. Of course, he is a man who hates property and religious liberty. It's no surprise if he acts spinelessly. But I tell you this: No man of principle wishes to see government force trump religious and property rights. Not one. The day after his religious and property rights comments sparked a Fox News-proclaimed "firestorm," the president said that he had no comment about the "wisdom" of building a mosque in Manhattan. Republicans quickly proclaimed that a "backtrack," but his clarification was in no way inconsistent with the earlier comment. Do you Tea Partiers see what you're doing? Has it penetrated your concrete skulls that the one time Obama stands up for constitutional liberty you are cussing him and demanding big government move to crush the free exercise of property rights? Does that seem at all ironic to you? You've had your emotions manipulated. You've been played for fools. As we discussed last week, the war enthusiasts, frustrated with their inability to sell Obama on attacking Iran, now hope to present him with a fait accompli by getting Israel to attack. They hope to force Obama to join the bloodbath already in progress. Former U.N. ambassador and infamous vampire John Bolton has publicly invited Israel to let some blood before the weekend. The neoconservatives are pulling all the stops, and they hope to manipulate you into supporting it by getting you worked up over an issue no one in his right mind could possibly give a damn about. If the Republican leaders and their fellow war enthusiasts across the aisle get their way, we could be quite possibly in the midst of World War III by next week. And if you spent the week before the war broke out sweating about some damn fool mosque, my friends, then shame on you. Shame on you. http://www2.mcdowellnews.com/news/2010/aug/10/new-cold-war-beware-mosque-building-muslims-ar-328984/ http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/combs2.1.1.html **JP** FW: Before & After Nose Surgery.
|
