Thursday, July 29, 2010

President Obama: African-Americans are a “mongrel people”



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Scotty Starnes's Blog <no-reply@wordpress.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Subject: [New post] President Obama: African-Americans are a "mongrel people"



President Obama: African-Americans are a "mongrel people"

We all are mongrels...according to Barack Hussein Obama

I'm just glad this wasn't said by a White person...only a half-white President...

President Obama waded into the national race debate in an unlikely setting and with an unusual choice of words: telling daytime talk show hosts that African-Americans are "sort of a mongrel people."

The president appeared on ABC's morning talk show "The View" Thursday, where he talked about the forced resignation of Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod, his experience with race and his roots.

When asked about his background, which includes a black father and white mother, Obama said of African-Americans: "We are sort of a mongrel people."

"I mean we're all kinds of mixed up," Obama said. "That's actually true of white people as well, but we just know more about it."

Nice save Mr. President. Throw in white people to cover your comment. This is what happens when you take away that trusted teleprompter. Our President is calling us all mutts. Wonder if we will hear the screams from the NAACP, Je$$e Jack$on or Al $harpton?

Here's another example of Obama's double talk...

Behar, a vocal liberal, teed up the president to talk about his critics on the right, asking Obama "where's your attack dog?"

But Obama didn't take the bait, responding "we shouldn't be campaigning all the time. There's a time to campaign, and there's a time to govern."

"I'm not perfect. My administration's not perfect," Obama said. "A lot of this criticism I listen to, and it's fair, I try to correct it."

Obama taped the interview Wednesday when he was in New York City for two Democratic National Committee fundraisers.

"We shouldn't be campaigning all the time...There's a time to campaign and there's a time to govern." Then Obama left "The View" to attend two DNC fundraiser with other elitists. That about sums it all up.

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Sherrod is suing scumbag Breitbart

How is Breitbart a "scumbag"??
 


 
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

California -- Arizona


-----
 
Subject: California -- Arizona

California:  Governor of California is jogging with his dog along a nature trail. A Coyote jumps out and attacks dog.

1. Governor starts to intervene, reflects upon the movie

"Bambi" and then realizes he should stop; the coyote is only doing what is natural.

2. He calls animal control. Animal control captures coyote and

spends $200 testing it for diseases and $500 upon relocating it.

3. He calls veterinarian. Vet collects dead dog and spends $200

testing it for diseases.

4. Governor goes to hospital and spends $3,500 getting checked

for diseases from the coyote and on getting bite wound bandaged.

5. Running trail gets shut down for 6 months while wildlife

services conduct a $100,000 survey to make sure the area is clear of dangerous animals.

6. Governor spends $50,000 of state funds implementing a "coyote awareness" program for residents of the area.

7. State legislature spends $2 million investigating how to

better handle rabies and how to possibly eradicate the disease.

8. Governor's security agent is fired for not stopping the

attack and for letting the Governor intervene.

9. Cost: $75,000 to train new security agent.

10. PETA protests the coyote relocation and files suit against

the state.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Arizona:  Governor of Arizona is jogging with her dog along a

nature trail. A Coyote jumps out and attacks dog.

1. Governor shoots coyote and keeps jogging. Governor has spent

$0.50 on a .45 ACP hollow point cartridge.

2. Buzzards eat dead coyote.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And that's only part of why California is broke.


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

WOW !! WOW !! AND WOW AGAIN !!



 
 
 
This was forwarded to me by a "liberal" friend.  It expresses my feelings and looks like those
of the majority of Americans.  As one of six brothers who served during WW II, I still have pride
in our country and its freedom service to the world.  At the same time I have increasing contempt
for our government in general who are willing to sell their souls for power, money, and votes.  Read
this carefully you young ones, especially those who voted this guy into power.
Marv XXXXX

WOW!  WOW! AND WOW AGAIN!!!
95 year old hero!


Letter T o Obama at Whitehouse Sent from 95 year Old Pearl Harbor Survivor !! Fantastic!!

WW II Battleship sailor tells Obama to shape up or ship out !

 
This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii
for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now. He dictated this letter  to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the president.

 
Dear President Obama,      
         
     My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year.  People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert.
 
I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate.  Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor , allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country.
 
One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man.
 
So here goes.
 
I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish.
 
I can't figure out what country you are the president of.
You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like:
             " We're no longer a Christian nation"
             " America is arrogant" - (Your wife even
                 announced to the world," America is mean-
                 spirited. " Please tell her to try preaching
                 that nonsense to 23 generations of our
                 war dead buried all over the globe who
                 died for no other reason than to free a
                 whole lot of strangers from tyranny and
                 hopelessness.)
I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you.  To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.
 
After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."
 
Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British?  Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War?  I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.
 
I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination.  You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.
 
Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man.
 
Shape up and start acting like an American.  If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue .  You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.
 
And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts , who was putting up a fight?  You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.
 
One more thing.  I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son.  Do your job.  When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him.  But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out.  The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.
 
You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president.  
You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy.  That's not our greatest threat.  Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now.
And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle...
 
Sincerely,
Harold B. Estes
 Snopes confirms as true:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/haroldestes.asp

When a 95 year old hero of the "the Greatest Generation" stands up and speaks out like this, I think we owe it to him to send his words to as many Americans as we can. Please pass it on.



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: Sherrod is suing scumbag Breitbart


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Republicans block campaign spending disclosure bill

Stu-Stu-Studio....
 
I'm not surprised that you would support such anti-free speech legislation.   The "Disclose Act" that you reference passed last month by the House, damages the ability of small groups to oppose far left, Anti-American extremist groups like the militant Homosexual Lobby who have been known to target donators who oppose their hate and Anti-American agenda. Of course, Harry Reid and Chuckie Schumer had no problem giving exemptions to Labor Unions and large groups like MoveOn.org,
 
Among the harmful provisions of the Disclose Act is a requirement to display donor's names on groups such as local Tea Party groups, or anyone raising more than $1200.00. 
 
Far left extremists and the socialists in Washington attempted to use this bill to keep themselves safe from opposition while allowing Labor and thug groups like the SEIU exemptions. 
 
Why were you not up in arms, demanding that all groups should have to be part and parcel to such biased, partisan legislation?
 

 
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:57 PM, studio <tlack@hotmail.com> wrote:
So what are they so afraid of?
Answer: they don't want the public to know who finances their
propaganda.

---
By Mark Arsenault, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- Republicans today blocked legislation drafted to require
more disclosure in campaign spending by corporations and unions,
voting as a bloc to stop the bill's advancement in the U.S. Senate.

The bill has been a high priority for President Obama, who called for
its passage as a counterweight to an expected flood of corporate
spending in the fall campaign.

On a straight party-line vote after a hot debate, an effort to defeat
a Republican filibuster fell two votes short of the 60 required to
move the bill forward. All 40 Republicans voted against it.

Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, bemoaned the lack of
bipartisanship that had carried campaign bills in the past. "It's like
skins and shirts," he said of the two parties.

But Republicans portrayed the bill as a partisan power grab, designed
by Democrats to stifle political speech and tilt campaign advantages
toward unions that favor Democratic incumbents.

"This is a transparent effort to rig the fall elections," said Senate
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican from Kentucky.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2010/07/republicans_blo.html
---

BTW: as an aside, Mitch McConnell will probably lose in Kentucky next
election.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

ACLU Approved

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

ACLU Sues Every City with Illegal Immigration-Related Measures









http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2010/07/aclu-sues-every-city-with-illegal.html

 

July 28, 2010

ACLU Sues Every City with Illegal Immigration-Related Measures

With today's decision of federal Judge Susan Bolton to disallow the portions of the Arizona immigration bill  (SB1070) that would allow illegal migrants to be put in ICE custody, at least one city, Freemont, Nebraska, has rescinded their own bill mimicking Arizona's. The ACLU and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) were threatening lawsuits, and so Fremont caved. Mark Krikorian, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies says the ACLU hopes Fremont will start a trend.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvaf5j_-xME3DJ19sB1GjA3Bdpflg81DxtKTfCrp92cHv9nev-cbZIFIbwiHvVsI7VDMWuRjruyUJ1t5kwoTIllkBw2Vx8wcz3ST278FHSPYiyQ8DxtDopZ5DdKnOemPoT1OiTvWBugbc/s320/ACLU_Enemy_ofthe_State_25.jpg

But I'm not aware of any city that has passed an immigration-related measure and that hasn't been sued by the ACLU, said Krikorian. "Their goal is intimidation. They are going to sue you until you cry 'uncle.'"

And so it goes with the communists at the ACLU. It is time to separate basic human rights from civil rights. If you are in the country illegally, there should be no right to civil rights. Human Rights, yes. Civil Rights no.

Arizona governor Jan Brewer says this is far from over. She is filing for an expedited appeal to the 9th Circus Liberal Court of Appeals in San Francisco. That's a complete time waster but necessary, as she can't get to the U.S. Supreme Court without the Marxists on the 9th Circuit rendering their decision first. The decisions coming out of the 9th are routinely overturned by the Supremes.  Let's hope SCOTUS  will agree to hear the case after the 9th Circus embarrasses themselves as usual, and thumbs their noses at the Rule of Law.  From Governor Brewer:

"I will battle all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary, for the right to protect the citizens of Arizona. Meanwhile, I also know we still have work to do in confronting the fear-mongers, those dealing in hate and lies and economic boycotts that seek to do Arizona harm.

"We have already made some progress in waking up Washington.  But the question still remains:  will Washington do its job, and put an end to the daily operations of smugglers in our nation, or will the delays and sidesteps continue?  I believe that the defenders of the rule of law will ultimately succeed with us in our demand for action."

I support the ACLU when defending constitutional rights, but they routinely oppress the rights of others by simply suing, intimidating and waiting for the cry 'uncle.' How many winnable law suits have been dropped because of ACLU threat tactics? Being illegal in America is not a civil right.

 

"One of the prettiest sounds on earth" is the Muslim call to prayer at sunset.

Barack Hussein Obama as quoted by Nicholas D. Kristof in the New York Times - March 6, 2007

 


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Quick Draw McObama (Video)








WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

The Eco-Nuts Strike back...and the Taxpayers are footing the bill:EPA Puts ‘Environmental Justice’ Front and Center in Its Rulemaking Process







The Eco-Nuts Strike back...and the Taxpayers are footing the bill:EPA Puts 'Environmental Justice' Front and Center in Its Rulemaking Process

"Environmental Justice?" Sounds like a title to a teenage comic book read by a bunch of pimply faced nerds who spend way too much time in their parent's basement watching "Avatar." Or it could just be a bunch of liberal-progressive Democrats. The description is interchangeable.

Yes, the Environmental Protection Agency is promoting "Environmental Justice" and wants its employees to "advance" it to low-income and minority communities. I guess those of us who are in the "other" category will be left out. More class warfare from the Obama administration.

CNS News reports:

 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released a 55-page "guidance" to help its employees "advance environmental justice" for low-income and minority communities.
 
"Achieving environmental justice is an Agency priority and should be factored into every decision," the document says.

The move comes 16 years after President William Clinton signed an executive order directing every federal agency to "make achieving environmental justice part of its mission." And Barack Obama campaigned on a promise to make "environmental justice policies a priority within the EPA."

'Fair treatment and meaningful involvement'
 
The EPA says its new guidelines will help its rule-writers identify potential environmental justice concerns, and it instructs them to analyze the impact of their rules on low-income and minority populations.
 
The EPA defines environmental justice as the "fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, particularly minority, low-income, and indigenous populations, and tribes, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies."
 
The guide states that from now on -- in the process of developing rules, policy statements, risk assessments, and other regulatory actions -- EPA managers and staffers must first ask themselves, "Does this action involve a topic that is likely to be of particular interest to or have particular impact upon minority, low-income, or indigenous populations, or tribes?"
 
If the answer is yes, the rule-writers must reach out to the affected minority and/or low-income communities. One section of the guide explains how EPA rule-writers may have to make "special efforts" to connect with people who may be uneducated or non-English-speaking.
 
"It will likely be necessary to tailor outreach materials to be concise, understandable, and readily accessible to the communities you are trying to reach," the guide says.

"Historically, the low-income and minority communities that carry the greatest environmental burdens haven't had a voice in our policy development or rulemaking," said EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson in announcing the release of the guide.
 
"This plan is part of my ongoing commitment to give all communities a seat at the decision-making table. Making environmental justice a consideration in our rulemaking changes both the perception and practice of how we work with overburdened communities, and opens this conversation up to new voices."

This is how Democrats works. Notice everyone is assigned to a group? Why does this only apply to groups of people and not to everyone in society? This is identity politics, something the Democrats are pros at.

This is also another attempt to 'spread the wealth.' Injecting 'environmental justice' into the equation will not come free. The taxpayers will have to pay for it in one way or another. Adding the word justice behind it will trick a few weak-minded followers. The rest of us know what the game is.

Notice this comes out when folks are talking about race in politics? Just another program to drive the wedge deeper and keep each side fighting and pointing fingers. Pay attention to whats going on.

By the way...isn't Lisa Jackson the same Lisa Jackson who claims CO2 is a dangerous pollutant? I wonder if it is only a 'danger' to low-income and minority communities?

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Pimp Your Mosque!









Pimp Your Mosque!

Posted By Oleg Atbashian On July 28, 2010

Holy Shiite! Pious pilgrimage just got more exciting at Imam Reza's shrine in Iran, where for a reasonable fee (see price list below) a mullah can join any eager pilgrim in holy matrimony of "temporary marriage" with his choice of a lovely, fully hijabed, and properly veiled prostitute for a period between 5 hours to 10 days. Pedophiles welcome: girls as young as 12 years of age are standing by. Not to worry, the mullahs got them covered: all "temps" under 14 must show a written consent from their fathers or male guardians (no doubt on advice from the recently fired, now freelancing ACORN specialists).

We are not making this up.

According to a document [1] obtained by Planet-Iran.com, the mullahs are doing it not for the money (what's a 5% pimp cut for a holy shrine?), but out of the noble desire "to elevate the spiritual atmosphere, create proper psychological conditions and tranquility of mind" of "those brothers who are on pilgrimage to the shrine." Verily, what true believer can maintain tranquility of mind and not succumb to sexual yearning while away from his other wives for nearly a week? No pious man should have to suffer such inhumanity.

Here's how it works. The mullah performs a ceremony that sanctions the "morality" of the relationship for a period specified in the "prenuptial agreement" (not more than 10 days, minimum charge 5 hrs) — in direct proportion to the size of the "bridegroom's" wallet. When the "godliness" of their prepaid romance expires, the "honeymooners" descend from the moral high ground to get an easy, Sharia-compliant divorce.

No citing of irreconcilable differences is required — but if it had been, I imagine the most common case would sound something like "I'm a deeply religious person, and she is a whore." As Allah and his prophet Mohammed would have it, a man can have many wives, so no laws are broken and the decorum is intact.

Everyone is happy: the mullahs count their money, the enlightened "pilgrim" goes home with a renewed sense of moral self-righteousness, and the recurrent bachelorette is back on the bridal market. In her case it's the reception room of the Center for Temporary Marriage (just next door to the shrine), where she sits on the couch reading Modern Bride and waiting, with a fainting heart, for the door to swing open and a tall, dark, handsome bridegroom to rush in, lift her in his arms, and carry her to the altar, and they would have a family and live happily ever after for as long as a whole week, or maybe even for the entire maximum allowed period of ten days.

But don't take my word for it. Here's the full document, translated into English by Planet-Iran.com:

In the name of Allah who is most gracious and merciful

Temporary Marriage (Marriage is among the traditions of the Prophet Mohammad)

In order to elevate the spiritual atmosphere, create proper psychological conditions and tranquility of mind, the Province of the Quds'eh-Razavi of Khorassan has created centers for temporary marriage (just next door to the shrine) for those brothers who are on pilgrimage to the shrine of our eighth Imam, Imam Reza, and who are far away from their spouses.

To that end, we call on all our sisters who are virgins, who are between the ages of 12 and 35 to cooperate with us. Each of our sisters who signs up will be bound by a two-year contract with the province of the Quds'eh-Razavi of Khorassan and will be required to spend at least 25 days of each month temporarily married to those brothers who are on pilgrimage. The period of the contract will be considered as a part of the employment experience of the applicant. The period of each temporary marriage can be anywhere between 5 hours to 10 days. The prices are as follows:

· 5 hour temporary marriage — 50,000 Tomans ($50 US)

· One day temporary marriage — 75,000 Tomans ($75 US)

· Two day temporary marriage — 100,000 Tomans ($100 US)

· Three day temporary marriage — 150,000 Tomans ($150 US)

· Between 4 and 10 day temporary marriage — 300,000 Tomans ($300 US)

Our sisters who are virgins will receive a bonus of 100,000 Tomans ($100 US) for the removal of their hymen.

After the expiration of the two-year contract, should our sisters still be under 35 years of age and should they be so inclined, they can be added to the waiting list of those who are seeking long-term temporary marriage. The employed sisters are obligated to donate 5% of their earnings to the Shrine of Imam Reza. We ask that all the sisters who are interested in applying, to furnish two full-length photographs (fully hijabed and properly veiled), their academic diplomas, proof of their virginity and a certificate of good physical and psychological health which they can obtain through the health and human services of the township of their residence. Please forward all compiled material and send to the below address by the 31st of the month of Ordibehesht, 1389 (May 21st, 2010).

Attention: For sisters who are below 14 years of age, a written consent from their fathers or male guardian is required.

Address: Mash'had, Shrine of Imam Reza, Shaheed Navab-Safavi, Kossar passage, Bureau of Temporary Marriages

or call Haji Mahmood Momtaz: 98/511/222-5790

And you thought speech codes only existed on your local public radio. The mullahs have been perfecting the magic of word games too, and with great efficiency. For instance, the above document can be used as proof that there is no prostitution in Iran.

Obviously, it is not sex tourism as long as they call it "visiting holy shrines." It is not sexual exploitation as long as the clients are called "brothers" and the whores are called "sisters." It is not a brothel as long as you call it a "Bureau." It is not prostitution as long as it is called "temporary marriage," the hustler is a mullah, and the pimp cut is an "obligatory donation."

See? No prostitution whatsoever. Just like there are no homosexuals in Iran. Sanctimonious language works every time whenever an irrational culture keeps people blind to reality, compelling them to judge others by what they say and not by what they do.

The mullahs are very peculiar about maintaining a highly moral society. And the society plays along, by exhibiting a highly moral behavior. And what happens in the Shrine of the Eighth Imam, stays in the Shrine of the Eighth Imam.

You may still be smirking about the new definition of "temporary employment agency." Or yucking that the meaning of "brothers" and "sisters" will never be the same again. And it may be a while before you stop associating the word "honeymoon" with the crescent on top of a mosque.

But don't be in a hurry to act superior. It seems ridiculous only because you're not accustomed to it. There are similarly ridiculous absurdities with which you grew up in your own culture without giving them much thought, or gave up fighting them.

For example, haven't you yourself swallowed and digested — at least partially — similarly sanctimonious speech codes of the American mainstream media? The political correctness as practiced by educators, entertainers, and politicians, who believe that a change of words can somehow change the objective reality?

The details may be different on the surface, but the core belief is the same — the game of banning, promoting, and inventing words puts them in control of your mind. At least in this respect, East and West appear to be sharing the same values.

Generally speaking, the Islamic culture is rather restrictive. But with a pious decorum and all the correct words, anything goes — from pedophilia to wholesale slaughter. Just don't forget to call it love, peace, friendship, tolerance, or sensitivity. And keep repeating "in the name of Allah who is most gracious and merciful" — bismillah al rahman al rahim — as often as you can.

The sanctimonious disguise can go a long way — even as far as New York, where you can build a mosque next to the ruins of Ground Zero and call it "a friendship center." As an added bonus, you get the moral right to malign the protesting Americans as "bigots" — and do so with a full backing on part of New York's "useful intellectuals" — a small but powerful sect with an extremely sanctimonious culture of their own.

Technically, the Muslim clerics behind the Ground Zero mosque are not the same as the Iranian mullahs, but their religionist tactics and belief in Sharia are identical. And although the New York sect is of a secular variety, it is also just as pious and self-delusional. Just as it is with the mullahs, anything is permissible here — from pedophilia [2] to theft [3] to wholesale slaughter [4] — as long as one claims good intentions and uses a politically correct language, like love, peace, friendship, tolerance, sensitivity, or economic equality and justice. Based on emotion rather than reason, the sect's irrational culture keeps its adepts blind to reality and compels them to judge others by their words rather than by their deeds.

And that is why the New York sect has no objections to Sharia, as long as its proponents use all the right words. The two sects seem to understand each other so well because on a deeper level they both speak the same language. That makes them natural allies. At least for the time being.


Article printed from Pajamas Media: http://pajamasmedia.com

URL to article: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/pimp-your-mosque/

URLs in this post:

[1] document: http://planet-iran.com/index.php/news/19414

[2] pedophilia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski

[3] theft: http://michellemalkin.com/2009/01/07/the-generational-theft-act-of-2009/

[4] wholesale slaughter: http://www.therealcuba.com/MurderedbyChe.htm

Copyright © 2010 Pajamas Media. All rights reserved.

 


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Joys of Muslim Women, Sometihng for America's Women To Look Forward To









 

 

 


  

 Joys of Muslim Women, Something for America's Women To Look Forward To


20 years from now, I will be in Heaven --bye 

This was written by a woman born in Egypt as a Muslim.  This is not hearsay, and it will scare the life out of you.
Make sure you read the paragraph (in red) towards the end.

Joys of Muslim Women
By Nonie Darwish

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9.
The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce.
To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.
Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry.  The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.

The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the West World ( America ) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her.  It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.

By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.
Ripping the West in Two.
Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law.

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza  before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on  Israel .  He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza .

When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing.. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual.  Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.

Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.

It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.

(In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the  U.S.   To elect the President by themselves! Rest assured they will do so... You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA ... Dearborn Mich. Is one... And there are others...)

I think everyone in the U.S. Should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful.. Some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam.. The peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While America is getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on America ..

This is your chance to make a difference...! Pass it on to your email list or at least those you think will listen..

Some of those I'm sending it to WILL NOT! 
Put your head back under the covers so you can't see the boogie man!

 

 

 


 


 

 

 


 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Arizonans Seeing Fewer Lowriders, Taco Stands on Streets


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: ] Racism Charges Against TP: Tactical Maneuver

Let them bow or bend over. I know where a good supply of railroad ties are stored.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:
better if they had an open mouth or a tongue stuck out

then we could do to them what they do to the country


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:
I prefer either of these.


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:

The Nation of Islam now makes dark brown toilet paper from recycled grocery bags


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:
A bit OT but I loved the subject line.  I thought this was about blacks complainig about amost all Toilet Paper being white in color.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:
pro-regressives derive their basic worldview from Herbert Marcuse, whos philosophy comes from Marx and Heidegger, both of whom helped create the doctrine adopted by the Nazis called polylogism.

They believe that there is no objective truth and hence no rationality or actual debate.  Everyone's beliefs are parochial and perspectival, part of a  Volk mind:  Aryan science vs Jewish schience, bourgeous economics, "it's a black thing."

They also harken back to Rousseau, who painted savages in the state of nature as more authentic than civilized people.  Thus blacks and other relatively impoverished or disadvatged groups are viewed as "wiser," like the Latinas, when actually they are usually culturally and educationally backwards, including many of their media and political elite members.


On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:32 AM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
What a despicable tactic to use.   If you can't tell the truth and win, then you don't deserve to win at all.   This is becoming all to often the MO of the "progressives" these days and there should be a major push back against them because of this.

Bruce Majors wrote:


 
 Racism Charges Against TP: Tactical Maneuver
 The National Center  for Public Policy Research
For Immediate Release: July 29, 2010
Contact: David Almasi at (202) 543-4110 x11 or cell (703) 568-4727
     or
dalmasi@nationalcenter.org
Judy Kent at (703) 759-7476 or jkent@nationalcenter.org

Left Admits: Racism Charges Against Tea Parties a Tactic, Not a Truth

Washington, D.C. - Members of the Project 21 black leadership group are condemning the left's false use of the accusation "racist" as a political tactic, saying they recognize the strategy from the teaching of left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky.

Former U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Chairman Mary Frances Berry, a long-time prominent liberal activist, has admitted in an interview with Politico that the left is trying to smear the tea party movement as "racist" for strategic reasons, not out of genuine concern that the movement is itself racist.

Berry called the tactic an "effective strategy" and chose not to denounce it.

"As an active participant in the tea party movement, I know the movement's motivation is about Obama's policies and not his race," said Deneen Borelli, a Project 21 full-time fellow who has spoken at many tea party rallies and is scheduled to speak at the "Uni-Tea" rally in Philadelphia on July 31.  "Race card politics is the last-ditch effort to shift the debate away from President Obama's harmful policies such as the government's takeover of health care and his failure to create jobs -- both of which are having an impact on his popularity.  This diversion may also help Obama to try to jam through cap-and-trade legislation through Congress.  It's a grand distraction from policies and may unfortunately increase racial tensions."

Berry, now the Geraldine R. Segal Professor of American Social Thought and History at the University of Pennsylvania, was asked, "will branding the tea party 'racist' work?" 

Berry replied:

Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats.  There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans.  But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November.  Having one's opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.

"This is exactly the kind of thing that has irked me all of my adult life, to put it mildly," said Project 21 member R. Dozier Gray.  "This willful and purposeful use of the race card for nothing more than political gain is toxic to race relations, and Mary Frances Berry must know that.  But she evidently does not care.  Based on her comment, political posturing takes primacy over whatever real issues regarding race that she might pretend are her calling cards.  I have seen this all before.  I find it shameful."

Project 21 member Bob Parks added: "What's most disturbing about this very public quote?  Not only is Mary Frances Berry making this comment without fear of admonishment, and that progressives have apparently embraced and are employing these very shameful, race-baiting tactics -- but Berry is likely teaching this 'social thought' hate to children."

Left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky, whose tactics have been studied and followed by Barack Obama and his followers, taught his activists to "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."  The Tea Party movement has unnerved the left and energized supporters of smaller government, causing the left to target it, as per Alinsky's method, with bogus racism charges.

The Politico interview with Berry is available at
http://www.politico.com/arena/bio/mary_frances_berry.html.


Project 21, a nonprofit and nonpartisan organization sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research, has been a leading voice of the African-American community since 1992.
__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
    .

    __,_._,___

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
     
    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.