--- On Sat, 7/17/10, sadia elter |
On Jul 14, 8:36 pm, Biff <jacobsenj...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Interesting delusional wingnut logic. I see keith on the oil soaked
> coast that you calculate the CEO of BP is not criminal for defacing a
> major feature of the Earth, but some schmuck is for defacing some
> dirty old wall. One gets a criminal record and a fine, the other gets
> a condo in St, John.
>
> Now you may right that the CEO faces no criminal charges for a variety
> of reasons, the primary being that he and the many responsible get to
> hide behind various forms of immunity for a protected class.
>
> My hat off to Euwe or an award of masochism for tangling with those
> whose attitudes are primarily responsible for the mess the US finds
> itself in. I'm sure fear, smear, hate, and a whole lot of making shit
> up are alive and well in this echo chamber.
>
> On Jul 13, 9:58 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > He'll most likely be out on appeal.
>
> > What is it that you believe the President of BP has done to be criminally
> > charged?
>
> > I went over this morning and looked at Euwetopia, (or I guess better
> > said, "Cosmotopia" these days)
>
> > It's amazing how that group of Moonbats attack logic. They defy common
> > sense. It will be a sobering wake up call for them in November.....
>
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 18 year old gets 8 years for spray painting a building
>
> > >http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/80870255/
>
> > > I wonder how many years BP CEO will receive for DESTROYING the GULF of
> > > Mexico and causing the death to millions of sea animals
>
> > > ...or will we just apologize for letting our coast get so close to
> > > their wells?
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > moonbat[2].jpg
> > 139KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Jul 18, 12:45 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> The question was YOUR definition of racism. That is what is needed.
> All too often what the dictionary has as a definition and what you in
> your most un-infinite wisdom decide a word means are poles apart. What
> is YOUR definition of racism. Then there is a starting place.
>
> euwe wrote:
> > Own a dictionary, dick?
>
> > On Jul 18, 12:29 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> You are the one with the word games. I asked a simple question.
> >> Define your terms. That is supposedly the first and most important of
> >> a discussion. You are doing everything you can to evade that by
> >> throwing up any and all other comments you can. What I might think of
> >> the guy in the article has nothing to do with this until you define
> >> what YOU mean by racism. Anything else is just dust to cover up.
>
> >> euwe wrote:
>
> >>> As I said, racists like to play word games like the guy in the article
> >>> - the neo nazi, a group that dick doesn't think has anything to do
> >>> with racism.
>
> >>> On Jul 17, 1:45 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> I would join you if I knew what you consider racism. You apparently
> >>>> are not interested in telling us what you consider racism to be, so I
> >>>> cannot join you in having that story speak to me as it does to you.
> >>>> Sorry. Maybe if you define your terms I can join you in your seeing
> >>>> racism. Until then, nada. In the meantime, showing stories and
> >>>> calling them racism tells me nothing at all. Define your terms or
> >>>> forget about it.
>
> >>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>> Look, you didn't see any racism in that story - that speaks loud
> >>>>> enough for me.
>
> >>>>> On Jul 17, 12:39 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Stick to the subject. How do you define racism. Define it and I
> >>>>>> will tell you whether I support racism or not. All else is garbage.
>
> >>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>>>> And that means what with this discussion?
> >>>>>>> --------
> >>>>>>> was there anything in that article related to racism? Did you see
> >>>>>>> anything there to comment on, either positive or negative? Would you
> >>>>>>> think that was a Republican, or a liberal?
>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 17, 11:22 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> And that means what with this discussion? This discussion was to do
> >>>>>>>> with whether I condemned racism and my expectation of your defining what
> >>>>>>>> you consider racism so I could respond. You are doing everything you
> >>>>>>>> can to keep from defining racism so I will not respond to your
> >>>>>>>> question. Throwing up a bunch of other stories does not change the
> >>>>>>>> basic issue of your not defining what you want me to respond to. Do
> >>>>>>>> that and we have something to discuss. Until then, you are saying
> >>>>>>>> nothing that is of the slightest interest for me to respond to.
>
> >>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 10:14 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> And you know this how. I think if they do so and you are friends, then
> >>>>>>>>>> that would reflect on you as well as on them. so I guess that would
> >>>>>>>>>> make you a racist by definition.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> but when they're alone with friends, they talk frankly about their
> >>>>>>>>>>> hate for minorities.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 8:24 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> people who are racist play word games rather than admit their racism
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 12:39 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anointed One,
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You are absolutely right. I know from prior dealings that euwe will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> just pick and pick until he has some little point that he thinks he can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> make a big deal out of and then will talk exclusively about that while
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ignoring all the major points that you make. I am saying that if you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> do not define what YOU mean by racism, then the possibilities of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> complete misunderstanding and misquoting are legion and homey just got
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tired of playing that game with euwe. It has been his MO and I think
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it sucks major.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about."
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I find that just the opposite is true. When someone asks you to define
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the terms it is meant to clarify point by point to avoid being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstood. Just think what would happen to Washington if Congress
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had to "define their terms", No unread obamacare, no, "we'll find out
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it happens again" wallstreet reform, Hell no Obama.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weasels and liars don't like "define the terms"..... honest men love
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 4:10 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about. I think you know what I mean. Does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racism, defined in any way at all, bother you? Enough to do something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about it?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 7:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Define racism. After all we have been told that speaking of black
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> holes in the sky is racist, black holes in an office is racist,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niggardly is racist, etc. Define your terms.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does racism bother you?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:34 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are. Makes no difference to me. Seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be a big point with the leftists though. They are the ones always
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a point about it. The rest of us have long ago agreed with MLK
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his rainbow ideal of life. I don't know what the leftists want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except to divide the nation up into little groups based on race, sex,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> color, age, national origin, etc and then try to make up special
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitlements for all of them so they can claim they care!! And then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the election forget all the above until the next election. At
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least that sure seems to be their MO. And then claim anyone who does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not support them is racist/sexist/ageist/whatever-ist. You are just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following your latest talking points from the 8:30 AM call.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you anti-racist, dick?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you could even write this garbage tells us just how racist
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are. You think that blaming the other guy as if he would do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what you would do in any circumstance is a good tactic. What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is is a real cry for help from your guts to put you out of your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misery. Let's just hope that the public is smart enough to do just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this November.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarcastic American! wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, July 15, 2010
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How 2 b a racist without being one
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was more confused than a libertarian who didn t know the definition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Laissez Faire economics due to his Franco phobia.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all know racism is wrong. Even the Conservatives know this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So how do you get around this? Conservatives know that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International Jewish Bankers created all their problems. But hey! Say
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in public and you are then branded as an anti-Semitic monster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those damn skinheads, Klansmen and Nazis make you blush because they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> express what in is in the
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Jul 18, 12:29 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> You are the one with the word games. I asked a simple question.
> Define your terms. That is supposedly the first and most important of
> a discussion. You are doing everything you can to evade that by
> throwing up any and all other comments you can. What I might think of
> the guy in the article has nothing to do with this until you define
> what YOU mean by racism. Anything else is just dust to cover up.
>
> euwe wrote:
> > As I said, racists like to play word games like the guy in the article
> > - the neo nazi, a group that dick doesn't think has anything to do
> > with racism.
>
> > On Jul 17, 1:45 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> I would join you if I knew what you consider racism. You apparently
> >> are not interested in telling us what you consider racism to be, so I
> >> cannot join you in having that story speak to me as it does to you.
> >> Sorry. Maybe if you define your terms I can join you in your seeing
> >> racism. Until then, nada. In the meantime, showing stories and
> >> calling them racism tells me nothing at all. Define your terms or
> >> forget about it.
>
> >> euwe wrote:
>
> >>> Look, you didn't see any racism in that story - that speaks loud
> >>> enough for me.
>
> >>> On Jul 17, 12:39 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> Stick to the subject. How do you define racism. Define it and I
> >>>> will tell you whether I support racism or not. All else is garbage.
>
> >>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>> And that means what with this discussion?
> >>>>> --------
> >>>>> was there anything in that article related to racism? Did you see
> >>>>> anything there to comment on, either positive or negative? Would you
> >>>>> think that was a Republican, or a liberal?
>
> >>>>> On Jul 17, 11:22 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> And that means what with this discussion? This discussion was to do
> >>>>>> with whether I condemned racism and my expectation of your defining what
> >>>>>> you consider racism so I could respond. You are doing everything you
> >>>>>> can to keep from defining racism so I will not respond to your
> >>>>>> question. Throwing up a bunch of other stories does not change the
> >>>>>> basic issue of your not defining what you want me to respond to. Do
> >>>>>> that and we have something to discuss. Until then, you are saying
> >>>>>> nothing that is of the slightest interest for me to respond to.
>
> >>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 17, 10:14 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> And you know this how. I think if they do so and you are friends, then
> >>>>>>>> that would reflect on you as well as on them. so I guess that would
> >>>>>>>> make you a racist by definition.
>
> >>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> but when they're alone with friends, they talk frankly about their
> >>>>>>>>> hate for minorities.
>
> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 8:24 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> people who are racist play word games rather than admit their racism
>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 12:39 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Anointed One,
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You are absolutely right. I know from prior dealings that euwe will
> >>>>>>>>>>> just pick and pick until he has some little point that he thinks he can
> >>>>>>>>>>> make a big deal out of and then will talk exclusively about that while
> >>>>>>>>>>> ignoring all the major points that you make. I am saying that if you
> >>>>>>>>>>> do not define what YOU mean by racism, then the possibilities of
> >>>>>>>>>>> complete misunderstanding and misquoting are legion and homey just got
> >>>>>>>>>>> tired of playing that game with euwe. It has been his MO and I think
> >>>>>>>>>>> it sucks major.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have
> >>>>>>>>>>>> no
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about."
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I find that just the opposite is true. When someone asks you to define
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the terms it is meant to clarify point by point to avoid being
> >>>>>>>>>>>> misunderstood. Just think what would happen to Washington if Congress
> >>>>>>>>>>>> had to "define their terms", No unread obamacare, no, "we'll find out
> >>>>>>>>>>>> if it happens again" wallstreet reform, Hell no Obama.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Weasels and liars don't like "define the terms"..... honest men love
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 4:10 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have no
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about. I think you know what I mean. Does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> racism, defined in any way at all, bother you? Enough to do something
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> about it?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 7:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Define racism. After all we have been told that speaking of black
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> holes in the sky is racist, black holes in an office is racist,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> niggardly is racist, etc. Define your terms.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does racism bother you?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:34 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are. Makes no difference to me. Seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be a big point with the leftists though. They are the ones always
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a point about it. The rest of us have long ago agreed with MLK
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his rainbow ideal of life. I don't know what the leftists want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> except to divide the nation up into little groups based on race, sex,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> color, age, national origin, etc and then try to make up special
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitlements for all of them so they can claim they care!! And then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the election forget all the above until the next election. At
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least that sure seems to be their MO. And then claim anyone who does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not support them is racist/sexist/ageist/whatever-ist. You are just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following your latest talking points from the 8:30 AM call.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you anti-racist, dick?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you could even write this garbage tells us just how racist
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are. You think that blaming the other guy as if he would do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what you would do in any circumstance is a good tactic. What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is is a real cry for help from your guts to put you out of your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misery. Let's just hope that the public is smart enough to do just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this November.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarcastic American! wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, July 15, 2010
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How 2 b a racist without being one
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was more confused than a libertarian who didn t know the definition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Laissez Faire economics due to his Franco phobia.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all know racism is wrong. Even the Conservatives know this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So how do you get around this? Conservatives know that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International Jewish Bankers created all their problems. But hey! Say
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in public and you are then branded as an anti-Semitic monster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those damn skinheads, Klansmen and Nazis make you blush because they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> express what in is in the deepest recessions of your mind. Plus your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pop lost his arm during WW2 fighting those Gerry s. You don t want to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be associated with that crowd. So what s a true American to do? Easy!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be a passive/aggressive bigot and get away with it! Just fallow my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easy plan.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being passive/aggressive is easy to do if you are an Anglo-Saxon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the many traits you have in your DNA is Sarcasm. Look how it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works for Glenn Beck! He gets paid the big bucks having a spasm of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mocking sarcasm. How about being stoic? You know: Clint Eastwood!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever see his early movies? Like all wasp, he internalizes his emotions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and represses it. That s a real man! Just think Dick Cheney? That man
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is dying of heart
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Were they or were they not hosting and aiding in the spread of unpaid
copyrighted material ??
If they were then the action was correct and has nothing to do with
free speech.
Example: 90 year old great grand mother has house taken by authorities
when it is learned that it was purchased by grandsons drug money.....
Grandma had no idea where the money came from... So what !!!
Let the buyer (or poster in this case) beware. One of the many
reasons Google requires moderators.
On Jul 18, 6:44 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-authorities-shut-down-wordpress-host-with...
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Congratulations on the Blog. It is the epitome of race baiting and the
sustaining of said same. Only when Negroes, Latinos, Whites or any
other sub group of Humanity see themselves as "Americans" without the
tag can racism end. Congratulations on sustaining and promoting
divisiveness.
On Jul 18, 6:49 am, glc3 <gcuse03cha...@aol.com> wrote:
> Why I'm ignoring Rush Limbaugh and why you should too.Many Have asked
> why I have not blogged about Rush Limbaugh's recent statements about
> the late George Steinbrenner making many African American's
> millionaires. Read my answer to that question by using this link:
>
> http://aareports.com/2010/07/why-im-ignoring-rush-limbaugh-and-why.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
If so, it is true and if this is your "deal breaker" then you are
indeed flawed.
On Jul 18, 6:49 am, glc3 <gcuse03cha...@aol.com> wrote:
> Why I'm ignoring Rush Limbaugh and why you should too.Many Have asked
> why I have not blogged about Rush Limbaugh's recent statements about
> the late George Steinbrenner making many African American's
> millionaires. Read my answer to that question by using this link:
>
> http://aareports.com/2010/07/why-im-ignoring-rush-limbaugh-and-why.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
http://aareports.com/2010/07/why-im-ignoring-rush-limbaugh-and-why.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
|
Global Warming Scam : 2010 is Not the Hottest Year
Warmers and Democrats are once again getting overheated by their own propaganda; claiming 2010 is the hottest year on record. The current Cap-n-Trade promotional reads something like this (from The Hill blogs):
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reported Thursday that the January-June period was the warmest worldwide on record, based on average land and ocean temperatures.
The NOAA data, which is based on records dating to 1880, ….
From NOAA's webpage:
NOAA: June, April to June, and Year-to-Date Global Temperatures are Warmest on Record
The monthly analysis from NOAA's National Climatic Data Center, which is based on records going back to 1880, is part of the suite of climate services NOAA provides government, business and community leaders so they can make informed decisions.
If you'd like to see a graph, click here.
According to Marc Morano at Climate Depot, the 10th of a degree difference they're talking about is the result of cherry-picking data.
Besides – this is summer, and what they're talking about is weather, not climate change.
But aside from the normally expected counter-analysis to warmist claims from those who are actually scientifically competent, there is a particular phrase in the new promo that immediately catches my attention – on record.
What record?
Even the most recent fake British inquiry into the behavior of scientists at East Anglia had to admit that their data was "misleading." Now one needs merely to take notice of the copy-paste arguments of rank and file warmers. NOAA has routinely presented results corresponding to those of East Anglia.
One of the most important facts discovered in relation to Climategate was that East Anglia's Phil Jones went to great effort to falsify temperature records throughout the world, asking its caretakers to replace their data with his fake data and for permission to present his fake data as original data from them. The United States, NOAA included, was not on the very short list of countries that said no. (And while we're at it, NASA – i.e. the godfather of the global warming hoax James Hansen at Columbia – is also not on that list.)
The Climategate conspirators have all gone back to work as if nothing happened. Warmers are once again using their products as talking points for government take-overs. Are they really expecting the rest of us to believe any of it? (Keywords: "hockey stick", "trick", "hide the decline")
.
Smile often, love well, be happy.
Let's put all the seniors in jail, and the criminals in a nursing home.
This way the seniors would have access to showers, hobbies, and walks, they'd receive unlimited free prescriptions, dental and medical treatment , wheel chairs etc. and they'd receive money instead of paying it out.
They would have constant video monitoring, so they could be helped instantly ,if they fell, or needed assistance. Bedding would be washed twice a week, and all clothing would be ironed and returned to them.
A guard would check on them every 20 minutes, and bring their meals and snacks to their cell. They would have family visits in a suite built for that purpose.
They would have access to a library, weight room,spiritual counseling, pool, and education.
Simple clothing , shoes, slippers, P.J.'s and legal aid would be free, on request.
Private, secure rooms for all, with an exercise outdoor yard ,with gardens.
Each senior could have a P.C. a T.V. radio, and daily phone calls.
There would be a board of directors , to hear complaints, and the guards would have a code of conduct, that would be strictly adhered to.
The "criminals" would get cold food, be left all alone, and unsupervised. Lights off at 8pm, and showers once a week.
Live in a tiny room , and pay $3000.00 per month and have no hope of ever getting out.
Justice for all.
This should make us think of what kind of world we've created for ourselves.
|
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
I didn't make that claim Dick, so it's up to someone else to prove
that.
If you believe he's right all the time, good for you, enjoy the
delusion.
All I said was that they were hacks and make-up stories, misinform and
appeal to the lowest common denominator in order to make big bucks.
Prove me wrong why don't you, because they prove me right everyday
they talk.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
On Jul 17, 1:45 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I would join you if I knew what you consider racism. You apparently
> are not interested in telling us what you consider racism to be, so I
> cannot join you in having that story speak to me as it does to you.
> Sorry. Maybe if you define your terms I can join you in your seeing
> racism. Until then, nada. In the meantime, showing stories and
> calling them racism tells me nothing at all. Define your terms or
> forget about it.
>
> euwe wrote:
> > Look, you didn't see any racism in that story - that speaks loud
> > enough for me.
>
> > On Jul 17, 12:39 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> Stick to the subject. How do you define racism. Define it and I
> >> will tell you whether I support racism or not. All else is garbage.
>
> >> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>> And that means what with this discussion?
> >>> --------
> >>> was there anything in that article related to racism? Did you see
> >>> anything there to comment on, either positive or negative? Would you
> >>> think that was a Republican, or a liberal?
>
> >>> On Jul 17, 11:22 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> And that means what with this discussion? This discussion was to do
> >>>> with whether I condemned racism and my expectation of your defining what
> >>>> you consider racism so I could respond. You are doing everything you
> >>>> can to keep from defining racism so I will not respond to your
> >>>> question. Throwing up a bunch of other stories does not change the
> >>>> basic issue of your not defining what you want me to respond to. Do
> >>>> that and we have something to discuss. Until then, you are saying
> >>>> nothing that is of the slightest interest for me to respond to.
>
> >>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38290873/ns/us_news-life/
>
> >>>>> On Jul 17, 10:14 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> And you know this how. I think if they do so and you are friends, then
> >>>>>> that would reflect on you as well as on them. so I guess that would
> >>>>>> make you a racist by definition.
>
> >>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> but when they're alone with friends, they talk frankly about their
> >>>>>>> hate for minorities.
>
> >>>>>>> On Jul 17, 8:24 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> people who are racist play word games rather than admit their racism
>
> >>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 12:39 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> Anointed One,
>
> >>>>>>>>> You are absolutely right. I know from prior dealings that euwe will
> >>>>>>>>> just pick and pick until he has some little point that he thinks he can
> >>>>>>>>> make a big deal out of and then will talk exclusively about that while
> >>>>>>>>> ignoring all the major points that you make. I am saying that if you
> >>>>>>>>> do not define what YOU mean by racism, then the possibilities of
> >>>>>>>>> complete misunderstanding and misquoting are legion and homey just got
> >>>>>>>>> tired of playing that game with euwe. It has been his MO and I think
> >>>>>>>>> it sucks major.
>
> >>>>>>>>> THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> "Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have
> >>>>>>>>>> no
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about."
>
> >>>>>>>>>> I find that just the opposite is true. When someone asks you to define
> >>>>>>>>>> the terms it is meant to clarify point by point to avoid being
> >>>>>>>>>> misunderstood. Just think what would happen to Washington if Congress
> >>>>>>>>>> had to "define their terms", No unread obamacare, no, "we'll find out
> >>>>>>>>>> if it happens again" wallstreet reform, Hell no Obama.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Weasels and liars don't like "define the terms"..... honest men love
> >>>>>>>>>> to.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 4:10 pm, euwe <machgie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Usually, when someone asks someone to define their terms, they have no
> >>>>>>>>>>> idea what you are talking about. I think you know what I mean. Does
> >>>>>>>>>>> racism, defined in any way at all, bother you? Enough to do something
> >>>>>>>>>>> about it?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 7:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Define racism. After all we have been told that speaking of black
> >>>>>>>>>>>> holes in the sky is racist, black holes in an office is racist,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> niggardly is racist, etc. Define your terms.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -------
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> does racism bother you?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:34 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't care what race people are. Makes no difference to me. Seems
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be a big point with the leftists though. They are the ones always
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> making a point about it. The rest of us have long ago agreed with MLK
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his rainbow ideal of life. I don't know what the leftists want
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> except to divide the nation up into little groups based on race, sex,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> color, age, national origin, etc and then try to make up special
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> entitlements for all of them so they can claim they care!! And then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after the election forget all the above until the next election. At
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> least that sure seems to be their MO. And then claim anyone who does
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not support them is racist/sexist/ageist/whatever-ist. You are just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> following your latest talking points from the 8:30 AM call.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> euwe wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you anti-racist, dick?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 16, 6:16 am, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that you could even write this garbage tells us just how racist
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are. You think that blaming the other guy as if he would do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what you would do in any circumstance is a good tactic. What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is is a real cry for help from your guts to put you out of your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misery. Let's just hope that the public is smart enough to do just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this November.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sarcastic American! wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, July 15, 2010
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How 2 b a racist without being one
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was more confused than a libertarian who didn t know the definition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Laissez Faire economics due to his Franco phobia.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all know racism is wrong. Even the Conservatives know this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So how do you get around this? Conservatives know that the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> International Jewish Bankers created all their problems. But hey! Say
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that in public and you are then branded as an anti-Semitic monster.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those damn skinheads, Klansmen and Nazis make you blush because they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> express what in is in the deepest recessions of your mind. Plus your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pop lost his arm during WW2 fighting those Gerry s. You don t want to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be associated with that crowd. So what s a true American to do? Easy!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be a passive/aggressive bigot and get away with it! Just fallow my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easy plan.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being passive/aggressive is easy to do if you are an Anglo-Saxon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the many traits you have in your DNA is Sarcasm. Look how it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works for Glenn Beck! He gets paid the big bucks having a spasm of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mocking sarcasm. How about being stoic? You know: Clint Eastwood!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ever see his early movies? Like all wasp, he internalizes his emotions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and represses it. That s a real man! Just think Dick Cheney? That man
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is dying of heart failure and do you see cry like a whiny Jew? Being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laconic is part of the Aryan experience. You transmit messages to your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fellow honkies by telepathic energy. White people can read each
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other s minds by a simple nod. You know who is causing the problems in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your nation? You want your country back! You don t want your country
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> black! You love the oil companies because your fellow Aryans controls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all of it. Jews and gays control Hollywood. Do you miss Walt Disney?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He knew how to deal with those Jewish controlled unions!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You must use codes words and phrases. Here are some samples.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. America is a Christian country! This code for the USA is a White
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nation. Nobody can accuse you of being a racist by claiming the main
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion is Christian. Why even blacks are Protestants Christians!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, we all know the only true Christians are white!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. The Liberal news media/Liberal Hollywood. Accusing an industry of a
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
JobShob.org: 17 new jobs | |
| Administrative Assistant - UAE Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:14 AM PDT ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Completion of secondary education, followed by short training courses in WP/Computer operation. Three years experience in clerical capacity including at least 2... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Executive Manager - Saudi Arabia Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:14 AM PDT A leading Refractory Services Company in Saudi Arabia requires qualified candidates to fill the following immediate vacancies: EXECUTIVE MANAGER Qualifications: B. Tech in... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Multiple Job Positions for a Polyclinic - Qatar Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:13 AM PDT The following faculties are needed for a new polyclinic in Qatar: General Medicine E.N.T Pediatrics Orthopedics Dermatology Dental Radio... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Sales Manager for Industrial Equipment - Saudi Arabia Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:13 AM PDT Sales Manager for Industrial Equipment Commercial and industrial company specialized in sales of oil and gas, energy and machine-building equipment, is looking for qualified candidates with... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Multiple Job Positions for A Multi Disciplinary Contracting Company - Saudi Arabia Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:13 AM PDT A Saudi Multidisciplinary Contracting Company is Seeking Experienced Managerial & Professional staff: Business Development Manager Master or Bachelor Degree in Engineering with minimum... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Sr. Designer / Branding Specialist and Sr. Copywriter (English) - Saudi Arabia Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT Sr. Designer / Branding Specialist As our Sr. Designer, you must be able to take on a senior role managing a team of two. Minimum 7 years of experience, a killer portfolio, strategic firepower... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| English Language Instructors for Kind Abdul Aziz University - Saudi Arabia Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT The English Language Institute at King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, is now accepting applications for the positions of female and male English Language Instructors at both the women and men... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Accountant required for a Trading Company - Oman Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT Urgently Required For A Trading Co. in Oman ACCOUNTANT Male, Filipino preferred, with 3-4 years experience in the same / similar field. Forward CV to... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Senior Accountant - Saudi Arabia Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT Our client an Electromechanical Company requires following candidates for their project in Saudi Arabia. SENIOR ACCOUNTANT Ideal candidates must have Saudi Experience and knowledge of... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT HR CONSULTANTS Required for a recruiting division. Ideal candidate should be graduated, with 3-4 years experience. Should be result oriented and can work independently. Salary:... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Commercial Account Executive - Oman Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT An international Insurance Broker in the Sultanate of Oman is looking to recruit a Commercial Account Executive. The successful candidate will be insurance qualified with a minimum... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Administration and HR Manager - UAE Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT We are a multinational third party inspection and certification company & currently require the following personnel: ADMINISTRATION & HR MANAGER Capable of handling development of... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Personal Loans Sales Executives - UAE Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:12 AM PDT Our client, a leading multinational bank, is growing their sales channels. Personal Loans Sales Executives (Male/Female) They are looking to hire candidates with: Previous personal loans sales... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:11 AM PDT Receptionist 25-35 Male & Female Diploma ( English, Computer 3-5 years or Business) Hotel background only. Send CV, photos, profile and video link to: Hr@alqudra.ae (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:11 AM PDT Gym Supervisor 25-35 Male & Female Physical education bachelor & sports courses 3-5 years. 3 Send CV, photos, profile and video link to: Hr@alqudra.ae (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:11 AM PDT A renowned Multinational Construction & Engineering company, QATAR is looking for MEP Estimator to join their team immediately. Candidate should be Mechanical Engineer with 5 years... (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| Sales and Marketing Executive and Sales and Marketing Assistant Manager Posted: 17 Jul 2010 05:11 AM PDT A leading Outdoor Advertising Company requires: Sales & Marketing Executive Sales & Marketing Assistant Manager Resumes to be sent to: recruitment.alsg@yahoo.com (Read Full Post on jobshob.org)
|
| You are subscribed to email updates from JobShob - Jobs in Middle East | Email delivery powered by Google |
