Saturday, July 10, 2010

**JP** Career Positions in Middle East (13 new jobs)


JobShob.org: 13 new jobs



Executive Secretary, Accountant and Sales Executive - Bahrain

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:05 PM PDT

Executive Secretary/ PA  Accountant  Sales Executives  Send your CV to: intercity@batelco. com.bh / Fax: 00-973-1-7910223

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Secretary Required - Kuwait

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:05 PM PDT

A Company in Kuwait Looking for A SECRETARY (Bilingual an advantage). Send CV to: trading20102010@ live.com

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Interior Designer - Bahrain

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

INTERIOR DESIGNER BS in Interior Design/ Architecture 5 years experience 3D rendering, Photoshop and AutoCAD proficient Ability to design commercial and residential spaces Email: interiordesigner....

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Media Sales for ArabianMagazines - Bahrain

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

Media Sales We offer great work environment, highest remuneration package, and excellent career prospects to the right people.  Bahrain Driving License required. Professionals only email...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Secretary Required - UAE

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

SECRETARY, University degree fluent in English, understands Arabic, required for a company, in Ras Al Khaimah. Email areej.uae@hotmail. com

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Electrical Technician - UAE

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

ELECTRICAL TECHNICIAN REQUIREMENTS  6 years varied experience in oil and gas Working knowledge of English  Diploma or equivalent required  UAE Experience...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


IT-Audit Assistant Manager - Oman

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

IT-Audit Assistant Manager - Job Code AD-05 Bachelors degree or equivalent in Information  Systems, Computer Science or related fields.  Requires at least one of the...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Multiple Job Position for a General Trading and Contracting Company - Kuwait

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

A leading General Trading & Contracting Co. is hiring candidates for following positions: Civil Engineer  Structural Engineer  Administration Assistant  Business Development...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Secretary Required - Kuwait

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

One of the leading business groups in Kuwait is seeking the following personnel: Secretary Qualifications, Skills and Knowledge: Fluent in English Excellent command of computer systems...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Cost Engineer and Mechanical Engineer - Kuwait

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:04 PM PDT

A Leading Project Management Company in Kuwait Currently requires, Dynamic, energetic, result-oriented individuals for the following positions: COST ENGINEER:   Profile: Perform...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Civil Engineer - Saudi Arabia

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:03 PM PDT

Saudi Company Specialized in Water Proofing and Insulation is looking for a : CIVIL ENGINEER Experience of two years in the field of marketing and sales Send their CVs to: Fax No.:...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Audio Visual Network Technicians - Saudi Arabia

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:03 PM PDT

For immediate hire in Hail City with attractive Salary Requirements: Bachelor Degree with excellent Computer Skills Good Command in English  Transferable Iqama is preferred  Email-...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


Senior Sales Executive and Sales Executive - GCC

Posted: 08 Jul 2010 02:03 PM PDT

A huge company needs the following positions: Senior Sales Executive: Male / Female  Minimum 5+ yrs work experience in corporate sales with multinational company. Insurance background will...

(Read Full Post on jobshob.org)


You are subscribed to email updates from JobShob - Jobs in Middle East

Email delivery powered by Google




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com

**JP** News from Afghanistan!!!!

The new general of the invading force in Afghanistan brought with him a new surge in violence with 7 NATO soldiers dead yesterday! The freedom fighters are not letting the invasion forces any minute of respite. It had been another bloody day. 6 US soldiers killed. One Australian solider killed. Several german soldiers injured. Many innocents bombed and killed by the invasion. Thousands came out to protest against the invaders in Mazar Shareef!...The fight is going on, each day the will of the invaders, who have no idea why they are there, is eroding, and its giving clear message to all that wished the massacares of innocents, to have their grip on resources, that Afghanistan is not a place for any invader, and that is a clearer message to the criminal military of india that their dirty games will come back to them and very soon (as india is exploding now with unrest and dissent and that will lead to a total disintegration!)....
 
Saleh
7437 J

Snopes for Dopes









As I've said all along.

B

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From:

Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:18 PM

Subject: [TP101] FW: Snopes for Dopes

 

 

Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an "Internet Propaganda Arm" pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.

For the past few years (http://www.snopescom/ has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research.

The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues.

A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the Internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers - and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg that no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm.

Yet, snopes.com issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things - not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the Internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock?

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line fact 'proceed with caution.' Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus,you can always search a subject and do the research yourself.

I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False. Then they gave their liberal slant! I have suspected some problems with snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder.

I have recently discovered that Snopes.com is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to You tube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not trust Snopes.com, ever for anything that remotely resembles truth! I don't even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore.

A few conservative speakers on MySpace told me about Snopes.com. A few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. Anyway just FYI please don't use Snopes.com anymore for fact checking and make your friends aware of their political leanings as well. Many people still think Snopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual. We need to make sure everyone is aware that that is a hoax in itself.

Thank you,

Alan Strong

Alan Strong CEO/Chairman

Commercial Programming Systems, Inc.

4400 Coldwater Canyon Ave. Suite

200 Studio City, CA. 91604-5039

 





--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Pols Guzzle Oil Money









Pols Guzzle Oil Money

by Samuel P. Jacobs

July 7, 2010 | 10:47pm

BS Top - Jacobs Oil MoneyPatrick Semansky / AP PhotoEven as more tar balls wash up, Congress is on pace to break its record on oil industry contributions. Samuel P. Jacobs on why no one can stop the most uncappable cash spill in politics.

President Obama was so upset about the BP oil spill he announced he was looking for "whose ass to kick." Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) was moved to ask whether companies with bad safety records should be banned altogether. Even oil-industry friendly Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) called for BP executive Tony Hayward to get his yacht down to the Gulf to help clean up oil.

The air in Washington is full of hostility toward the oil industry these days, the result of the Deepwater Horizon explosion nearly 80 days ago—and BP's continuing failure to plug the resulting leak. So you'd think all those politicians might be a bit sheepish about collecting campaign checks from the beleaguered industry right about now.

"It's definitely been challenging at times," says IPAA's Dan Naatz. But, he adds, "We haven't seen anybody walk away from us."

You'd be wrong. At the moment, oil and gas companies are on track to shatter their record of total contributions from the last non-presidential election cycle, in 2006—despite the lingering effects of the economic downturn. Halfway through the election calendar, the industry is on pace to spend more than $27 million—the most ever in a campaign year not involving the White House. With the stakes in Congress so high—from health care to financial regulation—the jump in spending is mirrored in other industries as well. Oil still lags behind 13 other industries in its Washington largesse.

When BP executive Tony Hayward went to Capitol Hill for a grilling last month, a list of the amount of money that members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee accepted from oil and gas companies made its way around the Internet. The ever-apologetic Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) had pocketed $100,470 from industry groups and employees since the beginning of 2009. He was outdone by Rep. Roy Blunt, the Missouri Republican who is in a tough race for Senate back home. Blunt's haul totaled $133,000. Even one of BP's fiercest critics, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), pocketed $6,000 from industry supporters.

The political action committee for the Independent Petroleum Association of America, known as the Wildcatters Fund, has sprinkled donations into the pockets of candidates and officeholders throughout the country. After the oil spill, Barton, Shelby, Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, and Republicans candidates for Congress, including Pennsylvania's Tim Burns, New Mexico's Steve Pearce, and Ohio's Rob Portman, have all accepted donations from IPAA's PAC.

Republicans aren't the only ones fueling up on the industry's largesse. Among the top 10 recipients of oil and gas money this election cycle are Democrats Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, and Rep. Chet Edwards of Texas. According the Center for Responsive Politics' Dave Levinthal, Democrats' share of the industry pie hasn't been this large since 1994.

So how does it feel to be both reviled and courted at the same time?

"It's definitely been challenging at times," says Dan Naatz, IPAA's vice president for federal resources, of the current climate in Washington. But Naatz says his group hasn't lost any supporters over spilled oil. "The people who we have supported in the past have been willing to work with us and talk with us," he says. "We haven't seen anybody walk away from us."

Naatz says his group isn't just preaching to the choir. IPAA staffers have met with staffers in the office of Sen. Robert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey, who has been a vocal critic of offshore drilling. The senator declined to join the meeting, but Naatz says Menendez's staff was receptive to IPAA's take on energy policy. Naatz says he knows the industry needs better regulation but worries that a rush to pass legislation by the August recess or by the November midterms will lead to wrongheaded policy.

Martin Durbin, the American Petroleum Institute's executive vice president of government affairs, says his group knows that officials are particularly sensitive to the bad feelings directed toward the oil industry at the moment.

"There are times when people will rather have a phone call than a meeting," Durbin says.

But he added that with investigations going on throughout Congress, API's number is being called more than ever. "It's not that we've got people blackballing us," Durbin says.

One key to surviving the fallout from BP: distancing the group's members from the guilty party in the Gulf of Mexico. The IPAA represents energy heavyweights like Devon Energy and Anadarko Petroleum, but Naatz's pitch to policymakers is to focus on what he calls the "small businesses" that make up many of the 5,000 companies belonging to his group.

"We get painted with a broad brush as Big Oil," Naatz says.

He makes a populist argument against the Obama administration's moratorium on deepwater offshore drilling; ending offshore exploration hurts not only multinational corporations but people who "shop at the same supermarkets as you do."

But Durbin of the American Petroleum Institute, which counts BP as a member, calls that strategy into question—arguing that no one in the industry benefits from painting British Petroleum in a bad light.

"This is no longer an issue about one company," Durbin says. "The entire industry has to show that it is committed to safety and reliability."

Still, he shares Naatz's tendency to play down the yachting execs, and play up the jobs at stake.

"My concern is people are going to use what is a tragic accident in a way that, in the end, could be very harmful for our energy, security, and economy. The industry's jobs support 9.2 million employees. We understand the things have to change. We can do this safely and reliably. But are we going to turn around and make things even harder on the economy?"

Samuel P. Jacobs is a staff reporter at The Daily Beast. He has also written for The Boston Globe, The New York Observer, and The New Republic Online.

Get a head start with the Morning Scoop email. It's your Cheat Sheet with must reads from across the Web. Get it.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.

 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

How Washington Plans to “Stabilize” Financial Institutions







 


How Washington Plans to "Stabilize" Financial Institutions
Posted by Thomas DiLorenzo on July 8, 2010 02:26 PM

By ordering them to abandon merit in hiring decisions and replace it with skin color and type of sex organ.   This is no surprise, of course, since the defining charactaristic of the American Left, in academe, politics, and elsewhere, is hatred of white heterosexual males ("while male oppressors" in the language of the academic Marxists who dominate higher education).  A second defining characteristic of the American Left, which is on display every week with Paul Krugman's New York Times columns, is radical and belligerent economic ignorance.


July 8, 2010
Racial, Gender Quotas in the Financial Bill?
By Diana Furchtgott-Roth

WASHINGTON - What one finds when reading congressional legislation is invariably surprising. Take the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill, for instance, which was created by merging Senate and House bills. When the Senate returns from recess one of its first actions will be to vote on the bill, which passed the House on June 30.

I was searching the bill for a provision about derivatives. What did I find but Section 342, which declares that race and gender employment ratios, if not quotas, must be observed by private financial institutions that do business with the government. In a major power grab, the new law inserts race and gender quotas into America's financial industry.

In addition to this bill's well-publicized plans to establish over a dozen new financial regulatory offices, Section 342 sets up at least 20 Offices of Minority and Women Inclusion. This has had no coverage by the news media and has large implications.

The Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the 12 Federal Reserve regional banks, the Board of Governors of the Fed, the National Credit Union Administration, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau...all would get their own Office of Minority and Women Inclusion.

Each office would have its own director and staff to develop policies promoting equal employment opportunities and racial, ethnic, and gender diversity of not just the agency's workforce, but also the workforces of its contractors and sub-contractors.

What would be the mission of this new corps of Federal monitors? The Dodd-Frank bill sets it forth succinctly and simply - all too simply. The mission, it says, is to assure "to the maximum extent possible the fair inclusion" of women and minorities, individually and through businesses they own, in the activities of the agencies, including contracting.

How to define "fair" has bedeviled government administrators, university admissions officers, private employers, union shop stewards and all other supervisors since time immemorial - or at least since Congress first undertook to prohibit discrimination in employment.

Sometimes, "fair" has been defined in relation to population numbers, for example, by the U.S. Department of Education in its enforcement of Title IX, passed in 1972 as an amendment to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which pertains to varsity athletic opportunities for male and female undergraduates.

Title IX was intended to protect against sex discrimination, but not to allow the use of quotas. Indeed, it specifically prohibited arbitrary leveling of student numbers by gender.

Yet in 1997 the courts essentially sided with an interpretation of the law promulgated by the Department of Education that left universities with no choice but to adopt a proportionality standard for college sports if they wished to avoid lawsuits. If 55% of the students are female, then 55% of the varsity sports slots have to go to women. Financial institutions might have to meet a similar proportionality standard.

Lest there be any narrow interpretation of Congress's intent, either by agencies or eventually by the courts, the bill specifies that the "fair" employment test shall apply to "financial institutions, investment banking firms, mortgage banking firms, asset management firms, brokers, dealers, financial services entities, underwriters, accountants, investment consultants and providers of legal services." That last would appear to rope in law firms working for financial entities.

Contracts are defined expansively as "all contracts for business and activities of an agency, at all levels, including contracts for the issuance or guarantee of any debt, equity, or security, the sale of assets, the management of the assets of the agency, the making of equity investments by the agency, and the implementation by the agency of programs to address economic recovery."

This latest attempt by Congress to dictate what "fair" employment means is likely to encourage administrators and managers, in government and in the private sector, to hire women and minorities for the sake of appearances, even if some new hires are less qualified than other applicants. The result is likely to be redundant hiring and a wasteful expansion of payroll overhead.

If the director decides that a contractor has not made a good-faith effort to include women and minorities in its workforce, he is required to contact the agency administrator and recommend that the contractor be terminated.

Section 342's provisions are broad and vague, and are certain to increase inefficiency in federal agencies. To comply, federal agencies are likely to find it easier to employ and contract with less-qualified women and minorities, merely in order to avoid regulatory trouble. This would in turn decrease the agencies' efficiency, productivity and output, while increasing their costs.

Setting up these Offices of Minority and Women Inclusion is a troubling indictment of current law. Women and minorities have an ample range of legal avenues already to ensure that businesses engage in nondiscriminatory practices. By creating these new offices, Congress does not believe that existing law is sufficient.

Cabinet-level departments already have individual Offices of Civil Rights and Diversity. In addition, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance are charged with enforcing racial and gender discrimination laws.

With the new financial regulation law, the federal government is moving from outlawing discrimination to setting up a system of quotas. Ultimately, the only way that financial firms doing business with the government would be able to comply with the law is by showing that a certain percentage of their workforce is female or minority.

The new Offices of Women and Minorities represent a major change in employment law by imposing gender and racial quotas on the financial industry. The issue deserves careful debate - rather than a few pages slipped into the financial regulation bill.
Diana Furchtgott-Roth is a contributing editor of RealClearMarkets and an adjunct fellow at the Manhattan Institute.


http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2010/07/08/diversity_in_the_financial_sector_98562.html

__._,_.___
 
 
 
.

__,_._,___


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

4th of July as Celebrated in Pelosiland


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Betty White's 2011 Calendar - The Golden Girl Poses With Shirtless Hunks


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Why Pay 60 Lacs more for Canadian Immigration Investor Programme

 Ad by Connect Marketing Services (202,815 corporate emails)
 
 
 
This email is Broadcast by a marketing company "Connect Marketing Services". If you no longer
 wish to receive promotion emails, please click to unsubscribe. For customer service inquiry please email or call us.
We are not responsible for any commitment made by the advertiser. Connect Marketing Services will be fully responsible for this activity only.
 
©2010 Connect Marketing Services -All rights reserved. Terms and Prices are subject to change.

Tag Heuer Carrera Caliber 1 Replica

Ad by Connect Marketing Services (202,815 corporate emails)
 
 
This email is Broadcast by a marketing company "Connect Marketing Services". If you no longer
 wish to receive promotion emails, please click to unsubscribe. For customer service inquiry please email or call us.
We are not responsible for any commitment made by the advertiser. Connect Marketing Services will be fully responsible for this activity only.
 
©2010 Connect Marketing Services -All rights reserved. Terms and Prices are subject to change.

**JP** Jobs | Catholic Relief Service | Project Officer, Field Officer


 
Dear Members,
 
 
We wish you all the best in your career.
 
Best Regard
AllPaperJobs      
AllPaperJobs is updated daily before 08:00 AM ( working days )  --   Please do not reply to this email.

DAWNThe NewsJangNawa-i-waqtDaily TimesThe NationExpressAusaf
 
AllPaperJobs is best viewed in Google Chrome (browser).    --    ©2010 AllPaperJobs - All rights reserved.